From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Cc: "Pielech, Adrian" <adrian.pielech@intel.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [TEST] Weird RSS state on ice
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 19:06:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625190625.0f5ffe01@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS4PPF7551E65529A34C04A73F4287C2B4EE5EC2@DS4PPF7551E6552.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:11:14 +0000 Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote:
> The patchset didn't help?
>
> [PATCH iwl-next v5 2/2] ice: implement symmetric RSS hash configuration
Not sure, it's not in tree, and lore doesn't want to point me at it
either. What I don't get is how we get into the bad state in the first
place.
Looking at other tests today I spotted that rss flow label test is also
behaving oddly. Most of the time the first case fails and the second
passes:
test "rss-flow-label-py"
group "selftests-drivers-net-hw"
result "fail"
link "https://netdev-ci-results.intel.com/ice-results/net-next-hw-2026-06-26--00-00/ice-E810-XXV4/rss_flow_label.py/stdout"
results
0
test "rss-flow-label-test-rss-flow-label"
result "fail"
1
test "rss-flow-label-test-rss-flow-label-6only"
result "pass"
But every now and then they skip:
ok 1 rss_flow_label.test_rss_flow_label # SKIP Device doesn't support Flow Label for UDP6
ok 2 rss_flow_label.test_rss_flow_label_6only # SKIP Device doesn't support Flow Label for UDP6
test "rss-flow-label-py"
group "selftests-drivers-net-hw"
result "skip"
link "https://netdev-ci-results.intel.com/ice-results/net-next-hw-2026-06-25--16-00/ice-E810-XXV4/rss_flow_label.py/stdout"
results
0
test "rss-flow-label-test-rss-flow-label"
result "skip"
1
test "rss-flow-label-test-rss-flow-label-6only"
result "skip"
The devlink info is identical so it must be that the device
is in unclean state sometimes?? Do y'all power cycle these
machines between runs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 15:30 [TEST] Weird RSS state on ice Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-24 15:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-25 7:11 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-06-25 7:11 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-06-26 2:06 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-26 5:51 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-06-26 5:51 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260625190625.0f5ffe01@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.pielech@intel.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.