From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: syzbot <syzbot@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Exempt in-kernel PIC from "disappearing" interrupt warning
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 21:20:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625212001.3B6561F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86078441-92eb-4461-b823-7d3539ac5859@mail.kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] The `!pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)` check inadvertently suppresses the warning for APIC bugs in the default full-irqchip mode, contradicting the commit's intent.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A malicious guest can still trigger the `WARN_ON_ONCE` in `kvm_check_and_inject_events` when KVM is configured with a split irqchip and Xen emulation is enabled.
--
commit a01ce83aaf4bff44e757aa3ac163f97e316b3056
Author: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
KVM: x86: Exempt in-kernel PIC from "disappearing" interrupt warning
This commit addresses a time-of-check to time-of-use race condition in the
in-kernel PIC that triggers a kernel warning when an interrupt disappears
between check and fetch. It modifies kvm_check_and_inject_events() to exempt
the in-kernel PIC from this warning. The intent is to preserve the warning
for other interrupt sources like the APIC.
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=0b59ccd5-8820-460d-84d3-94df6307bd6a
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -10857,7 +10857,9 @@ static int kvm_check_and_inject_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (r) {
> int irq = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
>
> - if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(irq == -1)) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(irq == -1 && !pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm));
[Severity: Medium]
Does this inadvertently suppress the warning for APIC bugs in the default
full-irqchip mode?
Since pic_in_kernel() evaluates to true when the in-kernel PIC is present,
checking !pic_in_kernel() disables the warning entirely for all interrupt
sources in that configuration. This appears to contradict the commit message
intent of preserving the warning for other sources like the APIC.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can a malicious guest still trigger this
warning when KVM is configured with a split irqchip and Xen emulation is
enabled?
If a guest concurrently toggles its evtchn_upcall_pending flag in memory
while the host executes the event injection loop, it seems this path is
directly reachable. Because pic_in_kernel() is false for a split irqchip,
the warning could still fire and potentially lead to a host panic if
panic_on_warn is enabled.
> +
> + if (irq != -1) {
> kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, irq, false);
> kvm_x86_call(inject_irq)(vcpu, false);
> WARN_ON(kvm_x86_call(interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) < 0);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/86078441-92eb-4461-b823-7d3539ac5859@mail.kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 21:10 [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Exempt in-kernel PIC from "disappearing" interrupt warning syzbot
2026-06-25 21:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-25 22:34 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2026-06-25 22:38 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260625212001.3B6561F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzbot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.