From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: pse-pd: guard against freed PI data on regulator disable
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2026 17:31:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260628153129.2995903-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615180048.828053-1-github@szelinsky.de>
Hi Simon,
Gentle ping on this one... I think I'm just waiting on your read before
I send v2, and I'd like to get it unblocked :-)
v2 would take pcdev->lock around the kfree() + pcdev->pi = NULL in
pse_release_pis() so the NULL is authoritative, and add the same
!pcdev->pi guard to pse_pi_is_enabled() and pse_pi_enable().
Two things I'd value your view on before I send the next version:
- Is the contained fix (lock around the free) ok, or would you prefer
the regulator unregister reordered ahead of pse_release_pis()?
- I couldn't find a concrete consumer hitting a regulator op on
another CPU during unbind, so I'd describe it as a narrow window
rather than a proven race. Does that sound right to you?
Happy to just send v2 with the lock fix if that works for you.
Thanks,
Carlo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-28 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-24 22:33 [PATCH net 0/2] net: pse-pd: fix use-after-free of PI array on controller teardown Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-24 22:33 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: pse-pd: disable IRQ before freeing PI data in unregister Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-27 12:55 ` Simon Horman
2026-05-30 10:50 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-06-01 16:25 ` Simon Horman
2026-06-15 17:59 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-24 22:33 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: pse-pd: guard against freed PI data on regulator disable Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-27 12:24 ` Simon Horman
2026-06-15 18:00 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-06-28 15:31 ` Carlo Szelinsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260628153129.2995903-1-github@szelinsky.de \
--to=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.