All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 23:23:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629152406.52582-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629152406.52582-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

Introduce global percpu data, inspired by the commit
6316f78306c1 ("Merge branch 'support-global-data'"). It enables the
definition of global percpu variables in BPF, similar to the
include/linux/percpu-defs.h::DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro.

For example, in BPF, it is able to define a global percpu variable like:

int data SEC(".percpu");

With this patch, tools like retsnoop [1] and bpfsnoop [2] can simplify
their BPF code for handling LBRs. The code can be updated from

static struct perf_branch_entry lbrs[1][MAX_LBR_ENTRIES] SEC(".data.lbrs");

to

static struct perf_branch_entry lbrs[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES] SEC(".percpu.lbrs");

This eliminates the need to retrieve the CPU ID using the
bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper.

Additionally, by reusing global percpu data map, sharing information
between tail callers and callees or freplace callers and callees becomes
simpler compared to reusing percpu_array maps.

Links:
[1] https://github.com/anakryiko/retsnoop
[2] https://github.com/bpfsnoop/bpfsnoop

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c   | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/const_fold.c |  1 -
 kernel/bpf/fixups.c     | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c   | 15 +++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index 248b4818178c..c4e9430941e5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -259,6 +259,37 @@ static void *percpu_array_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	return this_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask]);
 }
 
+static int percpu_array_map_direct_value_addr(const struct bpf_map *map, u64 *imm, u32 off)
+{
+	struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
+
+	if (map->max_entries != 1)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	if (off >= map->value_size)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn())
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	*imm = (u64)(__force unsigned long) array->pptrs[0];
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int percpu_array_map_direct_value_meta(const struct bpf_map *map, u64 imm, u32 *off)
+{
+	struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
+	u64 base = (u64)(__force unsigned long) array->pptrs[0];
+
+	if (map->max_entries != 1)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	if (imm < base || imm >= base + array->elem_size)
+		return -ENOENT;
+	if (!bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn())
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	*off = imm - base;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* emit BPF instructions equivalent to C code of percpu_array_map_lookup_elem() */
 static int percpu_array_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
 {
@@ -551,9 +582,10 @@ static int array_map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map,
 			       const struct btf_type *key_type,
 			       const struct btf_type *value_type)
 {
-	/* One exception for keyless BTF: .bss/.data/.rodata map */
+	/* One exception for keyless BTF: .bss/.data/.rodata/.percpu map */
 	if (btf_type_is_void(key_type)) {
-		if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY ||
+		if ((map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY &&
+		     map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) ||
 		    map->max_entries != 1)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -832,6 +864,8 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops percpu_array_map_ops = {
 	.map_get_next_key = bpf_array_get_next_key,
 	.map_lookup_elem = percpu_array_map_lookup_elem,
 	.map_gen_lookup = percpu_array_map_gen_lookup,
+	.map_direct_value_addr = percpu_array_map_direct_value_addr,
+	.map_direct_value_meta = percpu_array_map_direct_value_meta,
 	.map_update_elem = array_map_update_elem,
 	.map_delete_elem = array_map_delete_elem,
 	.map_lookup_percpu_elem = percpu_array_map_lookup_percpu_elem,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c b/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c
index b2a19acadb91..5787246bef30 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/const_fold.c
@@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ static void const_reg_xfer(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct const_arg_info *
 		u64 val = 0;
 
 		if (!bpf_map_is_rdonly(map) || !map->ops->map_direct_value_addr ||
-		    map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_INSN_ARRAY ||
 		    off < 0 || off + size > map->value_size ||
 		    bpf_map_direct_read(map, off, size, &val, is_ldsx)) {
 			*dst = unknown;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
index 3cf2cc6e3ab6..4f84d087ca69 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
@@ -1819,6 +1819,38 @@ int bpf_do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			goto next_insn;
 		}
 
+		if (env->prog->jit_requested &&
+		    bpf_jit_supports_percpu_insn() &&
+		    insn->code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW) &&
+		    (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_VALUE ||
+		     insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_IDX_VALUE)) {
+			struct bpf_map *map;
+
+			aux = &env->insn_aux_data[i + delta];
+			map = env->used_maps[aux->map_index];
+			if (map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY)
+				goto next_insn;
+
+			/*
+			 * Reuse the original ld_imm64 insn, and add one
+			 * mov64_percpu_reg insn.
+			 */
+
+			insn_buf[0] = insn[1];
+			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(insn->dst_reg, insn->dst_reg);
+			cnt = 2;
+
+			i++;
+			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
+			if (!new_prog)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+
+			delta    += cnt - 1;
+			env->prog = prog = new_prog;
+			insn      = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
+			goto next_insn;
+		}
+
 		if (insn->code != (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL))
 			goto next_insn;
 		if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 49a331c27b43..dbf76fa9d43d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5594,6 +5594,8 @@ int bpf_map_direct_read(struct bpf_map *map, int off, int size, u64 *val,
 	u64 addr;
 	int err;
 
+	if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_INSN_ARRAY || map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	err = map->ops->map_direct_value_addr(map, &addr, off);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
@@ -6149,6 +6151,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct b
 			if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off) &&
 			    bpf_map_is_rdonly(map) &&
 			    map->ops->map_direct_value_addr &&
+			    map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY &&
 			    map->map_type != BPF_MAP_TYPE_INSN_ARRAY) {
 				int map_off = off + reg->var_off.value;
 				u64 val = 0;
@@ -8117,6 +8120,12 @@ static int check_arg_const_str(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
+	if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
+		verbose(env, "%s points to percpu_array map which cannot be used as const string\n",
+			reg_arg_name(env, argno));
+		return -EACCES;
+	}
+
 	if (!bpf_map_is_rdonly(map)) {
 		verbose(env, "%s does not point to a readonly map'\n", reg_arg_name(env, argno));
 		return -EACCES;
@@ -18203,6 +18212,12 @@ static int check_and_resolve_insns(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 					return -EINVAL;
 				}
 
+				if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY &&
+				    !env->prog->jit_requested) {
+					verbose(env, "JIT is required to use global percpu data\n");
+					return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+				}
+
 				err = map->ops->map_direct_value_addr(map, &addr, off);
 				if (err) {
 					verbose(env, "invalid access to map value pointer, value_size=%u off=%u\n",
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 15:23 [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/9] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:23 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-06-29 15:50   ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data sashiko-bot
2026-06-30  5:50     ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-01 19:31   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-07-02  6:15     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/9] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/9] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30  5:54     ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-01 19:31       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-07-02  6:23         ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-01 19:32   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-07-02  6:16     ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 5/9] bpftool: Generate skeleton " Leon Hwang
2026-07-01 16:49   ` Quentin Monnet
2026-07-01 19:32     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-07-02  6:24       ` Leon Hwang
2026-07-02 10:14         ` Quentin Monnet
2026-07-02 14:08           ` Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify " Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 7/9] selftests/bpf: Test direct reading/writing read-only percpu_array map Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 8/9] selftests/bpf: Test verifier log for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-29 15:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 9/9] selftests/bpf: Verify bpf_iter " Leon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260629152406.52582-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.