All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:55:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630105543.1C08B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630104132.1598851-3-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] Out-of-bounds read in `do_post_copy_validation` due to redundant and unsynchronized size fields (`num_queues` and `config_sz`) during fragmented migration stream writes.
- [Low] Use of the architecture-dependent type `size_t` in a binary structure intended for serialization.
- [Low] Severe mismatch between kernel-doc comments and actual structure fields in `vfio_ap_migration_data` and `vfio_ap_config`.
--

commit b64c84539884d50cda90f18a69a0a94397d84158
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>

s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration

This commit introduces the foundational data structures needed to facilitate
state transitions during vfio device migration for the s390 vfio-ap driver.
It adds structures for migration data, queue information, and AP configuration.

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..239168c4b7fff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_migration.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@

[ ... ]

> +/**
> + * vfio_ap_migration_data - the data needed to migrate a guest with pass-through
> + *			    access to AP devices
> + *
> + * @mig_state:		the current migration state
> + * @resuming_migf:	the object used to resume the target guest
> + * @saving_migf:	the object used to save the state of the source guest
> + */
> +struct vfio_ap_migration_data {
> +	enum vfio_device_mig_state	mig_state;
> +
> +	struct {
> +		struct file *filp;
> +		struct vfio_ap_config	*ap_config;
> +		size_t			config_sz;
> +	} resuming_mig_state;
> +
> +	struct file			*stop_copy_mig_file;
> +};

[Severity: Low]
Are the kernel-doc fields for vfio_ap_migration_data out of sync with the
implementation? The comments document resuming_migf and saving_migf, but the
actual fields are resuming_mig_state and stop_copy_mig_file.

[ ... ]

> +/**
> + * vfio_ap_config - the guest's AP configuration
> + *
> + * @num_queues:	the number of queues passed through to the guest
> + * @reserved: padding to ensure proper alignment of qinfo array
> + * @qinfo:	an array of vfio_ap_queue_info objects, each specifying the
> + *		queue information for a queue passed through to the guest
> + */
> +struct vfio_ap_config {
> +	u32				num_queues;
> +	u8				reserved[4];
> +	size_t				config_sz;

[Severity: Low]
Does the kernel-doc block for vfio_ap_config need an update to include the
config_sz field?

[Severity: Low]
Could the use of size_t here cause consistency issues? Since size_t has
variable width depending on the architecture, using it in a binary structure
intended for serialization over file descriptors or the network is generally
avoided in favor of fixed-width types.

[Severity: Critical]
Could having both num_queues and config_sz in this struct lead to an
out-of-bounds read later during migration?

If a fragmented migration stream write manipulates config_sz to be a smaller
value than expected, the validation checks in reallocate_ap_config() could be
bypassed:

reallocate_ap_config() {
    cur_cfg_sz = ap_config->config_sz;
    num_queues = ap_config->num_queues;
    if (cur_cfg_sz >= sizeof(struct vfio_ap_config)) {
        ...
    } else {
        new_cfg_sz = cur_cfg_sz + len;
    }
}

This could cause an out-of-bounds read in do_post_copy_validation() when
looping num_queues times over the qinfo array:

queues_available_on_target_system() {
    for (int i = 0; i < source_config->num_queues; i++) {
        apqn = source_config->qinfo[i].apqn;
...
}

Is it possible to synchronize these fields or derive the size directly from
num_queues to prevent a mismatch?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630104132.1598851-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 10:41 [PATCH v3 00/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration support Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] s390/vfio-ap: Provide function to get the number of queues assigned to mdev Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] s390/vfio-ap: Data structures for facilitating vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 10:55   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] s390/vfio-ap: Initialize/release vfio device migration data Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] s390/vfio-ap: Reset migration state in VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl handler Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] s390-vfio-ap: Callback to get/set vfio device mig state during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition guest migration state from STOP to STOP_COPY Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to save the vfio device migration state Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RESUMING Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add method to set a new guest AP configuration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] s390/vfio-ap: File ops called to resume the vfio device migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state to STOP Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] s390/vfio-ap: Transition device migration state from STOP to RUNNING and vice versa Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] s390/vfio-ap: Callback to get the size of data to be migrated during guest migration Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add 'migratable' feature to sysfs 'features' attribute Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] s390/vfio-ap: Add live guest migration chapter to vfio-ap.rst Anthony Krowiak
2026-06-30 11:54   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260630105543.1C08B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.