From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>,
elver@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com, morbo@google.com,
justinstitt@google.com
Subject: Re: objtool: undefined stack state in folio_zero_user()
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 22:24:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630202427.GH49529@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630174157.GE48970@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 07:41:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Also, there is always a 'free' register to store RSP, it is called: RSP
> :-)
>
> Now, clearly I don't actually know much of LLVM internals, but this is
> all quite insane.
I had Gemini talk me though trying to do this, and while I got the
modified llvm to build, I could not actually get it to 'work'. It builds
a kernel fine, but it still does the same stupid.
The idea was to explicitly allow rematerialization of RSP 'loads'. But
like said, it isn't actually helping.
FWIW...
---
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
index 86a5a631ce73..ebec3a7563ca 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
@@ -816,6 +816,13 @@ bool X86InstrInfo::isReMaterializableImpl(
case X86::PTILEZEROV:
return true;
+ case X86::MOV64rr: {
+ const MachineOperand &SrcOp = MI.getOperand(1);
+ if (SrcOp.isReg() && SrcOp.getReg() == X86::RSP)
+ return true;
+ break;
+ }
+
case X86::MOV8rm:
case X86::MOV8rm_NOREX:
case X86::MOV16rm:
@@ -964,6 +971,15 @@ void X86InstrInfo::reMaterialize(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
Register DestReg, unsigned SubIdx,
const MachineInstr &Orig,
LaneBitmask UsedLanes) const {
+ const DebugLoc &DL = Orig.getDebugLoc();
+ if (Orig.getOpcode() == X86::MOV64rr &&
+ Orig.getOperand(1).isReg() &&
+ Orig.getOperand(1).getReg() == X86::RSP) {
+ BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(X86::MOV64rr), DestReg)
+ .addReg(X86::RSP);
+ return;
+ }
+
bool ClobbersEFLAGS = Orig.modifiesRegister(X86::EFLAGS, &TRI);
if (ClobbersEFLAGS && MBB.computeRegisterLiveness(&TRI, X86::EFLAGS, I) !=
MachineBasicBlock::LQR_Dead) {
@@ -984,7 +1000,6 @@ void X86InstrInfo::reMaterialize(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
llvm_unreachable("Unexpected instruction!");
}
- const DebugLoc &DL = Orig.getDebugLoc();
BuildMI(MBB, I, DL, get(X86::MOV32ri))
.add(Orig.getOperand(0))
.addImm(Value);
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp
index c84e0f441a45..913c28740eef 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/BitVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/LiveRegMatrix.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
@@ -1167,6 +1168,32 @@ bool X86RegisterInfo::getRegAllocationHints(Register VirtReg,
if (!VRM)
return BaseImplRetVal;
+ if (MachineInstr *DefMI = MRI->getVRegDef(VirtReg)) {
+ if (DefMI->getOpcode() == X86::MOV64rr &&
+ DefMI->getOperand(1).isReg() &&
+ DefMI->getOperand(1).getReg() == X86::RSP) {
+ bool IsKMSANTrackingBlock = false;
+ const MachineBasicBlock *MBB = DefMI->getParent();
+
+ for (const MachineInstr &MI : *MBB) {
+ if (MI.isCall() && MI.getOperand(0).isSymbol()) {
+ StringRef SymName(MI.getOperand(0).getSymbolName());
+ if (SymName == "__msan_chain_origin") {
+ IsKMSANTrackingBlock = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (IsKMSANTrackingBlock) {
+ if (llvm::is_contained(Order, X86::RSP)) {
+ Hints.insert(Hints.begin(), X86::RSP);
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
if (ID != X86::TILERegClassID) {
if (DisableRegAllocNDDHints || !ST.hasNDD() ||
!TRI.isGeneralPurposeRegisterClass(&RC))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <35822cf3c35fc6621621f858e94a2b0ce19abf88.camel@yandex.ru>
2026-06-30 10:44 ` objtool: undefined stack state in folio_zero_user() Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 12:31 ` Dmitry Antipov
2026-06-30 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 14:14 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-06-30 17:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-30 20:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-30 18:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-01 15:18 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-07-01 16:23 ` Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630202427.GH49529@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.