From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jie Gan" <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 02:07:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701020757.B90331F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v4-3-aefab449a470@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Switching the Trace NOC from an AMBA device to a platform device exposes a double clock disable bug during driver unbind due to mixing devm-managed clocks with manual PM runtime callbacks.
--
commit dec424aa5c224444a6c7946ea25210a9094f968f
Author: Jie Gan <jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue
This commit switches the traceNoC node from an AMBA device to a platform
device to fix an issue where the device is stuck in deferred probe due to
missing CID registers.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/kaanapali.dtsi
[ ... ]
> @@ -5004,7 +5004,7 @@ tpdm_pcie_rscc_out: endpoint {
> };
>
> tn@111b8000 {
> - compatible = "qcom,coresight-tnoc", "arm,primecell";
> + compatible = "qcom,coresight-agtnoc";
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does migrating this node to
the platform driver expose a double clock disable issue during unbind?
When the driver binds via the platform device, if a user unbinds the driver
via sysfs while the device is runtime suspended, it seems to trigger an
unbalanced clk_disable_unprepare() call.
Looking at tnoc_platform_remove() in drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tnoc.c:
static void tnoc_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct trace_noc_drvdata *drvdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
coresight_unregister(drvdata->csdev);
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
if (drvdata->atid > 0)
coresight_trace_id_put_system_id(drvdata->atid);
}
Since tnoc_platform_remove() calls pm_runtime_disable() without first
waking the device (e.g. via pm_runtime_get_sync()), the device remains
suspended and its clock remains disabled by tnoc_runtime_suspend().
When the driver finishes unbinding, the devres framework executes the
cleanup action for devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(), which calls
clk_disable_unprepare() a second time.
Could this lead to a clock subsystem underflow?
> reg = <0x0 0x111b8000 0x0 0x4200>;
>
> clocks = <&aoss_qmp>;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701-fix-tracenoc-probe-issue-v4-0-aefab449a470@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 1:53 [PATCH v4 0/5] Fix traceNoC probe issue on multiple QCOM platforms Jie Gan
2026-07-01 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: coresight-tnoc: Add standalone qcom,coresight-agtnoc compatible Jie Gan
2026-07-01 6:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-01 7:16 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-01 7:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-01 7:31 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-01 11:02 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-07-01 12:54 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-01 13:09 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-07-01 13:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-02 0:51 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-01 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] coresight: tnoc: add AG tnoc standalone compatible to the platform driver Jie Gan
2026-07-01 2:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 6:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-01 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: fix traceNoC probe issue Jie Gan
2026-07-01 2:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Jie Gan
2026-07-01 2:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 1:53 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: use Aggregator TNOC compatible Jie Gan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260701020757.B90331F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.