All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Use PHY API for PHY power sequences
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 13:05:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701130558.1954E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701122024.19557-7-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Double unregister of the PHY platform device on error paths.
- [High] HDMI audio codec platform device is leaked due to a copy-paste error.
- [High] Ignoring the return value of phy_power_on() causes an unbalanced phy_power_off() call if power-on fails.
--

commit 6e6e078245707d85aa500b0a872e31948a456e4f
Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Use PHY API for PHY power sequences
    
The PHY driver has gained support for .power_on() and .power_off()
callbacks: use the API provided phy_power_on(), phy_power_off()
functions instead of writing into PHY registers from this driver.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> index 97bce8966a1f3..3b5348ab487de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> @@ -1425,21 +1427,37 @@ static void mtk_dp_power_enable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
>  			   SW_RST_B_PHYD, SW_RST_B_PHYD);
>  	mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE,
>  			   DP_PWR_STATE_BANDGAP_TPLL, DP_PWR_STATE_MASK);
> -	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL,
> -		     RG_DPAUX_RX_VALID_DEGLITCH_EN | RG_XTP_GLB_CKDET_EN |
> -		     RG_DPAUX_RX_EN);
> -	mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034, 0, DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN);
> +
> +	if (mtk_dp->phy_dev) {
> +		mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL,
> +			     RG_DPAUX_RX_VALID_DEGLITCH_EN | RG_XTP_GLB_CKDET_EN |
> +			     RG_DPAUX_RX_EN);
> +		mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034, 0, DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN);
> +	} else {
> +		ret = phy_power_on(mtk_dp->phy);
> +		if (ret)
> +			dev_warn(mtk_dp->dev, "Could not power on PHY!\n");

[Severity: High]
Does ignoring the return value of phy_power_on() cause an unbalanced
phy_power_off() call if power-on fails?

If phy_power_on() fails, the error is swallowed and only a warning is printed.
The function returns normally, leaving the PHY core's internal power_count at 0.

> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void mtk_dp_power_disable(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_PWR_STATE, 0);
>  
> -	mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034,
> +	if (unlikely(mtk_dp->phy_dev)) {
> +		mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_0034,
>  			   DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN, DA_CKM_CKTX0_EN_FORCE_EN);
>  
> -	/* Disable RX */
> -	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL, 0);
> +		/* Disable RX */
> +		mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, DP_PHY_AUX_RX_CTL, 0);
> +	} else {
> +		ret = phy_power_off(mtk_dp->phy);

[Severity: High]
Can this unbalanced teardown lead to refcount underflows?

This function unconditionally calls phy_power_off() even if the initial
power-on failed. This decrements power_count to -1 and attempts to disable
regulators and release PM runtime references that were never actually acquired.

> +		if (ret)
> +			dev_warn(mtk_dp->dev, "Could not power off PHY!\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	mtk_dp_write(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_TOP_MEM_PD,
>  		     0x550 | FUSE_SEL | MEM_ISO_EN);
>  }

[ ... ]

The following issues were introduced earlier in this patch series in commit
"drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Fix hdmi codec and phy driver unregistration":

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dp.c
> @@ -2680,18 +2687,29 @@ static int mtk_dp_register_audio_driver(struct device *dev)
>  		.data = mtk_dp,
>  		.no_capture_mute = 1,
>  	};
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	mtk_dp->audio_pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev,
>  							   HDMI_CODEC_DRV_NAME,
>  							   PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
>  							   &codec_data,
>  							   sizeof(codec_data));
> -	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(mtk_dp->audio_pdev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(mtk_dp->audio_pdev))
> +		return PTR_ERR(mtk_dp->audio_pdev);
> +
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs, mtk_dp->phy_dev);

[Severity: High]
Does this devm action incorrectly register mtk_dp->phy_dev for cleanup instead
of the newly created mtk_dp->audio_pdev?

Since this function is called before mtk_dp_register_phy(), mtk_dp->phy_dev is
NULL. When the driver is unbound, devres executes mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs(NULL),
and the actual audio_pdev is permanently leaked.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->audio_pdev);
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> +				     "Failed to add codec unregister devm action");
> +	}
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int mtk_dp_register_phy(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = mtk_dp->dev;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	mtk_dp->phy_dev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "mediatek-dp-phy",
>  							PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> @@ -2701,6 +2719,13 @@ static int mtk_dp_register_phy(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
>  		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(mtk_dp->phy_dev),
>  				     "Failed to create device mediatek-dp-phy\n");
>  
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs, mtk_dp->phy_dev);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->phy_dev);

[Severity: High]
Does this error path cause a double unregister of the PHY platform device?

If devm_add_action_or_reset() fails, it automatically executes the cleanup
action (mtk_dp_unregister_pdevs), which calls
platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->phy_dev). The error handler then manually
calls platform_device_unregister(mtk_dp->phy_dev) a second time.

Alternatively, if devm_add_action_or_reset() succeeds but devm_phy_get() fails
later in the function, the error handler manually unregisters the device. The
probe then fails, and devres cleans up by executing the registered action,
unregistering the device a second time.

> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> +				     "Failed to add phy unregister devm action");
> +	}
> +
>  	mtk_dp_get_calibration_data(mtk_dp);
>  
>  	mtk_dp->phy = devm_phy_get(&mtk_dp->phy_dev->dev, "dp");

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701122024.19557-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 12:20 [PATCH 00/11] drm: MediaTek DisplayPort cleanups and MT8196 eDP AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dp: Deprecate nvmem efuse data AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/11] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dp: Add compatible for MT8196 eDP AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Fix hdmi codec and phy driver unregistration AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Clarify SMC eDP/DP video unmute commands AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Rework register offsets for proper PHY usage AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 12:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Use PHY API for PHY power sequences AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:05   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for PHY from devicetree AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Move max link rate to SoC specific data AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for HotPlug Detection in DP AUX AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 13:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Add support for eDP1.5 IPs and MT8196 SoC AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 14:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 12:20 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/mediatek: mtk_dp: Clarify XTAL freq and Debounce registers AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2026-07-01 14:09   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701130558.1954E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.