All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Jeffery" <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Enable async shutdown support
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 14:06:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701140641.92EE91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701135015.81937-6-djeffery@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Runtime PM usage counter and PM state leak on device_add error path.
- [High] Concurrent lockless bitfield mutations cause Data Race and PM state corruption.
--

commit 10ebc4309581b7d74ed1d3564b5f1af2a5cf5785
Author: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>

scsi: Enable async shutdown support

Like scsi's async suspend support, allow scsi devices to be shut down
asynchronously to reduce system shutdown time.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> index dfc3559e7e04f..8fd317aef37b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> @@ -1386,6 +1386,7 @@ static int scsi_target_add(struct scsi_target *starget)
>  	pm_runtime_set_active(&starget->dev);
>  	pm_runtime_enable(&starget->dev);
>  	device_enable_async_suspend(&starget->dev);
> +	dev_set_async_shutdown(&starget->dev);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does adding dev_set_async_shutdown() here
exacerbate a data race with system suspend?

In scsi_target_add(), device_add() is called earlier, exposing the device
to the PM core. If a system-wide suspend happens concurrently,
device_prepare() may lock the device and set the is_prepared bitfield.

Since device_enable_async_suspend() and dev_set_async_shutdown() locklessly
mutate bitfields in dev->power in the same memory word, couldn't the
resulting read-modify-write instructions overwrite and clear the is_prepared
flag set by the PM core?

>  	return 0;
>  }

[ ... ]

> @@ -1412,6 +1413,7 @@ int scsi_sysfs_add_sdev(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>  	transport_configure_device(&starget->dev);
>  
>  	device_enable_async_suspend(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
> +	dev_set_async_shutdown(&sdev->sdev_gendev);

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could the error path for
device_add(&sdev->sdev_gendev) leak the PM usage counter and runtime state?

When scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() is called, it increments the PM usage count via
scsi_autopm_get_device(sdev) and enables runtime PM. If the subsequent
device_add(&sdev->sdev_gendev) fails, the function returns the error directly
without dropping the usage counter or disabling runtime PM:

scsi_sysfs_add_sdev() {
    ...
    scsi_autopm_get_device(sdev);
    ...
    error = device_add(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
    if (error) {
        sdev_printk(...);
        return error;
    }
}

Would this prevent the device and its parent target from ever entering
runtime suspend, causing unbounded power drain?

>  	scsi_autopm_get_target(starget);
>  	pm_runtime_set_active(&sdev->sdev_gendev);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701135015.81937-1-djeffery@redhat.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 13:50 [PATCH v18 0/5] shut down devices asynchronously David Jeffery
2026-07-01 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] driver core: separate function to shutdown one device David Jeffery
2026-07-01 13:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] driver core: do not always lock parent in shutdown David Jeffery
2026-07-01 14:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 13:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] driver core: async device shutdown infrastructure David Jeffery
2026-07-01 14:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 13:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI: Enable async shutdown support David Jeffery
2026-07-01 14:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 13:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: " David Jeffery
2026-07-01 14:06   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-16 15:22 [PATCH v17 0/5] shut down devices asynchronously David Jeffery
2026-06-16 15:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Enable async shutdown support David Jeffery
2026-06-16 15:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 19:31 [PATCH v16 0/5] shut down devices asynchronously David Jeffery
2026-05-18 19:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Enable async shutdown support David Jeffery
2026-04-29 17:50 [PATCH v15 0/5] shut down devices asynchronously David Jeffery
2026-04-29 17:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Enable async shutdown support David Jeffery
2026-04-20 15:26 [PATCH v14 0/5] shut down devices asynchronously David Jeffery
2026-04-20 15:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: Enable async shutdown support David Jeffery
2026-04-21  7:46   ` John Garry
2026-04-21 15:21   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-07 15:35 [PATCH v13 0/5] shut down devices asynchronously David Jeffery
2026-04-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: enable async shutdown support David Jeffery
2026-04-07 16:34   ` John Garry
2026-04-08 14:16     ` David Jeffery
2026-04-08 15:53       ` John Garry
2026-04-08 19:35         ` David Jeffery
2026-04-09 12:17           ` John Garry
2026-04-09 20:36             ` David Jeffery
2026-03-19 14:11 [PATCH v12 0/5] shut down devices asynchronously David Jeffery
2026-03-19 14:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: enable async shutdown support David Jeffery
2026-03-20  2:20   ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-03-11 17:12 [PATCH 1/5] driver core: do not always lock parent in shutdown David Jeffery
2026-03-11 17:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: enable async shutdown support David Jeffery

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701140641.92EE91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.