All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ziy@nvidia.com,yang@os.amperecomputing.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,ryan.roberts@arm.com,npache@redhat.com,ljs@kernel.org,liam@infradead.org,lance.yang@linux.dev,dev.jain@arm.com,david@kernel.org,baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,baohua@kernel.org,riel@surriel.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-huge_memory-set-pg_has_hwpoisoned-only-after-new-folio-head-is-established.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 10:59:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701175915.1FAF41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm/huge_memory: set PG_has_hwpoisoned only after new folio head is established
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     mm-huge_memory-set-pg_has_hwpoisoned-only-after-new-folio-head-is-established.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-huge_memory-set-pg_has_hwpoisoned-only-after-new-folio-head-is-established.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: mm/huge_memory: set PG_has_hwpoisoned only after new folio head is established
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 13:42:34 -0400

__split_folio_to_order() copies the hwpoison state onto each new sub-folio
while splitting a folio to a non-zero order.  It does so via

	if (handle_hwpoison && page_range_has_hwpoisoned(new_head, new_nr_pages))
		folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(new_folio);

*before* clear_compound_head(new_head)/prep_compound_page(new_head, ...)
turns @new_head from a tail page into a proper folio head.

PG_has_hwpoisoned is a FOLIO_SECOND_PAGE flag, so
folio_set_has_hwpoisoned() resolves to folio_flags(folio, 1).  With the
new compound_info-based page-flags layout, folio_flags() asserts the page
is not a tail:

	VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(page->compound_info & 1, page);
	VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(n > 0 && !test_bit(PG_head, &page->flags.f), page);

At the current call site @new_head still has the tail marker
(compound_info bit 0 set, PG_head clear), so on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM kernels
this hits:

  kernel BUG at include/linux/page-flags.h:354
  folio_flags+0x82
  folio_set_has_hwpoisoned
  __split_folio_to_order
  __split_unmapped_folio
  __folio_split
  truncate_inode_partial_folio  (shmem hole-punch / MADV_REMOVE)

Reproduced by syzkaller: hwpoison-inject a few subpages of a large shmem
folio, then MADV_REMOVE (fallocate punch hole) on the same range, which
splits the partial folio to a non-zero order.

memory_failure() tries to split the poisoned folio to order 0 first, but
that split is best-effort; when it fails the folio is left large with
PG_has_hwpoisoned set, the case fa5a06170036 added this hwpoison copying
for.

Move the folio_set_has_hwpoisoned() call to after
clear_compound_head()/prep_compound_page(), where @new_folio is a real
order-new_order head folio (handle_hwpoison implies new_order != 0, so a
second page always exists).  The flag still lands on the same struct page
(page[1] of the new folio); only the ordering relative to compound-head
setup changes, satisfying the FOLIO_SECOND_PAGE precondition.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260701174235.3173401-1-riel@surriel.com
Fixes: fa5a06170036 ("mm/huge_memory: preserve PG_has_hwpoisoned if a folio is split to >0 order")
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/huge_memory.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-huge_memory-set-pg_has_hwpoisoned-only-after-new-folio-head-is-established
+++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3587,10 +3587,6 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struc
 				 (1L << PG_dropbehind) |
 				 LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK));
 
-		if (handle_hwpoison &&
-		    page_range_has_hwpoisoned(new_head, new_nr_pages))
-			folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(new_folio);
-
 		new_folio->mapping = folio->mapping;
 		new_folio->index = folio->index + i;
 
@@ -3612,6 +3608,14 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struc
 			folio_set_large_rmappable(new_folio);
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * PG_has_hwpoisoned is on the 2nd page, so set it after
+		 * the compound head is prepped.
+		 */
+		if (handle_hwpoison &&
+		    page_range_has_hwpoisoned(new_head, new_nr_pages))
+			folio_set_has_hwpoisoned(new_folio);
+
 		if (folio_test_young(folio))
 			folio_set_young(new_folio);
 		if (folio_test_idle(folio))
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from riel@surriel.com are

mm-huge_memory-set-pg_has_hwpoisoned-only-after-new-folio-head-is-established.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701175915.1FAF41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.