All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	 Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 01/14] rtnetlink: Lock sock_net(skb->sk) in rtnl_newlink().
Date: Wed,  1 Jul 2026 21:41:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701214334.266991-2-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701214334.266991-1-kuniyu@google.com>

There are a few cases where rtnl_net_lock() is not properly
held in rtnl_newlink().

When either of IFLA_NET_NS_PID / IFLA_NET_NS_FD / IFLA_TARGET_NETNSID
is specified but IFLA_LINK_NETNSID is not, sock_net(skb->sk) is used
as link_net in rtnl_newlink_link_net().

In addition, the do_setlink() path uses sock_net(skb->sk) and one
from the three netns attributes while rtnl_link_get_net_capable()
returns only one of four.

Let's add sock_net(skb->sk) to rtnl_nets in rtnl_newlink().

Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
No fixes tag is needed since there is no real bug nor assertion.
---
 net/core/rtnetlink.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 12aa3aa1688b..f39c93e80e20 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -282,10 +282,11 @@ static int rtnl_net_cmp_locks(const struct net *net_a, const struct net *net_b)
 #endif
 
 struct rtnl_nets {
-	/* ->newlink() needs to freeze 3 netns at most;
-	 * 2 for the new device, 1 for its peer.
+	/* ->newlink() needs to freeze 4 netns at most;
+	 * 2 for the new device, 1 for its peer, 1 for
+	 * an existing device (do_setlink() path).
 	 */
-	struct net *net[3];
+	struct net *net[4];
 	unsigned char len;
 };
 
@@ -4155,6 +4156,8 @@ static int rtnl_newlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		}
 	}
 
+	rtnl_nets_add(&rtnl_nets, get_net(sock_net(skb->sk)));
+
 	rtnl_nets_lock(&rtnl_nets);
 	ret = __rtnl_newlink(skb, nlh, ops, tgt_net, link_net, peer_net, tbs, data, extack);
 	rtnl_nets_unlock(&rtnl_nets);
-- 
2.55.0.rc0.799.gd6f94ed593-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 21:41 [PATCH v1 net-next 00/14] net: Support per-netns device unregistration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 02/14] rtnetlink: Call unregister_netdevice_many() only once in rtnl_link_unregister() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 03/14] rtnetlink: Add per-netns rtnl_work Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 04/14] net: Wrap default_device_exit_net() with __rtnl_net_lock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 05/14] net: Hold __rtnl_net_lock() in netdev_wait_allrefs_any() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 06/14] net: Add per-netns netdev unregistration infra Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 07/14] net: Call unregister_netdevice_many() per netns Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 08/14] veth: Support per-netns device unregistration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 09/14] bareudp: Protect bareudp_list with mutex Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 10/14] bareudp: Support per-netns netdev unregistration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 11/14] ipvlan: Convert ipvl_port.count to refcount_t Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 12/14] ipvlan: Synchronise ipvlan_init() and ipvlan_uninit() for the same lower dev Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 13/14] ipvlan: Protect ipvl_port.ipvlans with mutex Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-01 21:41 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 14/14] ipvlan: Support per-netns netdev unregistration Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-02  7:45 ` [syzbot ci] Re: net: Support per-netns device unregistration syzbot ci
2026-07-02 21:59   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701214334.266991-2-kuniyu@google.com \
    --to=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.