From: wei.fang@oss.nxp.com
To: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, wei.fang@nxp.com,
chleroy@kernel.org
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 03/14] net: enetc: convert ndo_set_rx_mode() to ndo_set_rx_mode_async()
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 10:57:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702025714.456233-4-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702025714.456233-1-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com>
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
The current ndo_set_rx_mode() is called under netif_addr_lock spinlock
with BHs disabled, which prevents drivers from sleeping. To work around
this limitation, the enetc driver uses a dedicated workqueue to defer
MAC address list updates to a sleepable context.
Since commit 3554b4345d85 ("net: introduce ndo_set_rx_mode_async and
netdev_rx_mode_work") introduced the ndo_set_rx_mode_async() callback,
drivers can now handle address list updates directly in a sleepable
context.
Therefore, convert the enetc driver to use ndo_set_rx_mode_async() and
remove the dedicated workqueue and the deferred work item accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h | 2 -
.../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c | 178 ++++++------------
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
index 04a5dd5ea6c7..06a9f1ee0970 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
@@ -324,8 +324,6 @@ struct enetc_si {
const struct enetc_drvdata *drvdata;
const struct enetc_si_ops *ops;
- struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
- struct work_struct rx_mode_task;
struct dentry *debugfs_root;
struct enetc_msg_swbd msg; /* Only valid for VSI */
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
index 48a74db90ed5..a02b01753ff2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
@@ -101,24 +101,23 @@ static void enetc4_pf_clear_maft_entries(struct enetc_pf *pf)
}
static int enetc4_pf_add_maft_entries(struct enetc_pf *pf,
- struct enetc_mac_addr *mac,
- int mac_cnt)
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *uc)
{
struct maft_entry_data maft = {};
+ struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
u16 si_bit = BIT(0);
- int i, err;
+ int err;
maft.cfge.si_bitmap = cpu_to_le16(si_bit);
- for (i = 0; i < mac_cnt; i++) {
- ether_addr_copy(maft.keye.mac_addr, mac[i].addr);
- err = ntmp_maft_add_entry(&pf->si->ntmp_user, i, &maft);
- if (unlikely(err)) {
- pf->num_mfe = i;
+ netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(ha, uc) {
+ ether_addr_copy(maft.keye.mac_addr, ha->addr);
+ err = ntmp_maft_add_entry(&pf->si->ntmp_user, pf->num_mfe,
+ &maft);
+ if (unlikely(err))
goto clear_maft_entries;
- }
- }
- pf->num_mfe = mac_cnt;
+ pf->num_mfe++;
+ }
return 0;
@@ -128,23 +127,29 @@ static int enetc4_pf_add_maft_entries(struct enetc_pf *pf,
return err;
}
-static int enetc4_pf_set_uc_exact_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf)
+static void enetc4_pf_set_uc_hash_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf,
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *uc)
{
- int max_num_mfe = pf->caps.mac_filter_num;
- struct enetc_mac_filter mac_filter = {};
- struct net_device *ndev = pf->si->ndev;
- struct enetc_mac_addr *mac_tbl;
- struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ struct enetc_mac_filter *mac_filter = &pf->mac_filter[UC];
struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
- int i = 0, err;
- int mac_cnt;
u64 hash;
- netif_addr_lock_bh(ndev);
+ enetc_reset_mac_addr_filter(mac_filter);
+ netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(ha, uc)
+ enetc_add_mac_addr_ht_filter(mac_filter, ha->addr);
+
+ bitmap_to_arr64(&hash, mac_filter->mac_hash_table,
+ ENETC_MADDR_HASH_TBL_SZ);
+ enetc_set_si_uc_hash_filter(pf->si, 0, hash);
+}
+
+static int enetc4_pf_set_uc_exact_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf,
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *uc)
+{
+ int mac_cnt = netdev_hw_addr_list_count(uc);
+ struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
- mac_cnt = netdev_uc_count(ndev);
if (!mac_cnt) {
- netif_addr_unlock_bh(ndev);
/* clear both MAC hash and exact filters */
enetc_set_si_uc_hash_filter(si, 0, 0);
enetc4_pf_clear_maft_entries(pf);
@@ -152,79 +157,42 @@ static int enetc4_pf_set_uc_exact_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf)
return 0;
}
- if (mac_cnt > max_num_mfe) {
- err = -ENOSPC;
- goto unlock_netif_addr;
- }
-
- mac_tbl = kzalloc_objs(*mac_tbl, mac_cnt, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!mac_tbl) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto unlock_netif_addr;
- }
-
- netdev_for_each_uc_addr(ha, ndev) {
- enetc_add_mac_addr_ht_filter(&mac_filter, ha->addr);
- ether_addr_copy(mac_tbl[i++].addr, ha->addr);
- }
-
- netif_addr_unlock_bh(ndev);
+ if (mac_cnt > pf->caps.mac_filter_num)
+ return -ENOSPC;
/* Set temporary unicast hash filters in case of Rx loss when
* updating MAC address filter table
*/
- bitmap_to_arr64(&hash, mac_filter.mac_hash_table,
- ENETC_MADDR_HASH_TBL_SZ);
- enetc_set_si_uc_hash_filter(si, 0, hash);
+ enetc4_pf_set_uc_hash_filter(pf, uc);
enetc4_pf_clear_maft_entries(pf);
- if (!enetc4_pf_add_maft_entries(pf, mac_tbl, i))
+ if (!enetc4_pf_add_maft_entries(pf, uc)) {
+ enetc_reset_mac_addr_filter(&pf->mac_filter[UC]);
enetc_set_si_uc_hash_filter(si, 0, 0);
-
- kfree(mac_tbl);
+ }
return 0;
-
-unlock_netif_addr:
- netif_addr_unlock_bh(ndev);
-
- return err;
}
-static void enetc4_pf_set_mac_hash_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf, int type)
+static void enetc4_pf_set_mc_hash_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf,
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *mc)
{
- struct net_device *ndev = pf->si->ndev;
- struct enetc_mac_filter *mac_filter;
- struct enetc_si *si = pf->si;
+ struct enetc_mac_filter *mac_filter = &pf->mac_filter[MC];
struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
u64 hash;
- netif_addr_lock_bh(ndev);
- if (type & ENETC_MAC_FILTER_TYPE_UC) {
- mac_filter = &pf->mac_filter[UC];
- enetc_reset_mac_addr_filter(mac_filter);
- netdev_for_each_uc_addr(ha, ndev)
- enetc_add_mac_addr_ht_filter(mac_filter, ha->addr);
-
- bitmap_to_arr64(&hash, mac_filter->mac_hash_table,
- ENETC_MADDR_HASH_TBL_SZ);
- enetc_set_si_uc_hash_filter(si, 0, hash);
- }
+ enetc_reset_mac_addr_filter(mac_filter);
+ netdev_hw_addr_list_for_each(ha, mc)
+ enetc_add_mac_addr_ht_filter(mac_filter, ha->addr);
- if (type & ENETC_MAC_FILTER_TYPE_MC) {
- mac_filter = &pf->mac_filter[MC];
- enetc_reset_mac_addr_filter(mac_filter);
- netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, ndev)
- enetc_add_mac_addr_ht_filter(mac_filter, ha->addr);
-
- bitmap_to_arr64(&hash, mac_filter->mac_hash_table,
- ENETC_MADDR_HASH_TBL_SZ);
- enetc_set_si_mc_hash_filter(si, 0, hash);
- }
- netif_addr_unlock_bh(ndev);
+ bitmap_to_arr64(&hash, mac_filter->mac_hash_table,
+ ENETC_MADDR_HASH_TBL_SZ);
+ enetc_set_si_mc_hash_filter(pf->si, 0, hash);
}
-static void enetc4_pf_set_mac_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf, int type)
+static void enetc4_pf_set_mac_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf, int type,
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *uc,
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *mc)
{
/* Currently, the MAC address filter table (MAFT) only has 4 entries,
* and multiple multicast addresses for filtering will be configured
@@ -232,15 +200,16 @@ static void enetc4_pf_set_mac_filter(struct enetc_pf *pf, int type)
* unicast filtering. If the number of unicast addresses exceeds the
* table capacity, the MAC hash filter will be used.
*/
- if (type & ENETC_MAC_FILTER_TYPE_UC && enetc4_pf_set_uc_exact_filter(pf)) {
+ if (type & ENETC_MAC_FILTER_TYPE_UC &&
+ enetc4_pf_set_uc_exact_filter(pf, uc)) {
/* Fall back to the MAC hash filter */
- enetc4_pf_set_mac_hash_filter(pf, ENETC_MAC_FILTER_TYPE_UC);
+ enetc4_pf_set_uc_hash_filter(pf, uc);
/* Clear the old MAC exact filter */
enetc4_pf_clear_maft_entries(pf);
}
if (type & ENETC_MAC_FILTER_TYPE_MC)
- enetc4_pf_set_mac_hash_filter(pf, ENETC_MAC_FILTER_TYPE_MC);
+ enetc4_pf_set_mc_hash_filter(pf, mc);
}
static const struct enetc_pf_ops enetc4_pf_ops = {
@@ -467,17 +436,17 @@ static void enetc4_pf_free(struct enetc_pf *pf)
enetc4_free_ntmp_user(pf->si);
}
-static void enetc4_psi_do_set_rx_mode(struct work_struct *work)
+static int enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *ndev,
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *uc,
+ struct netdev_hw_addr_list *mc)
{
- struct enetc_si *si = container_of(work, struct enetc_si, rx_mode_task);
- struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
- struct net_device *ndev = si->ndev;
+ struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ struct enetc_pf *pf = enetc_si_priv(priv->si);
+ struct enetc_si *si = priv->si;
bool uc_promisc = false;
bool mc_promisc = false;
int type = 0;
- rtnl_lock();
-
if (ndev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) {
uc_promisc = true;
mc_promisc = true;
@@ -500,17 +469,9 @@ static void enetc4_psi_do_set_rx_mode(struct work_struct *work)
enetc_set_si_mc_hash_filter(si, 0, 0);
/* Set new MAC filter */
- enetc4_pf_set_mac_filter(pf, type);
-
- rtnl_unlock();
-}
+ enetc4_pf_set_mac_filter(pf, type, uc, mc);
-static void enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *ndev)
-{
- struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
- struct enetc_si *si = priv->si;
-
- queue_work(si->workqueue, &si->rx_mode_task);
+ return 0;
}
static int enetc4_pf_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
@@ -540,7 +501,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops enetc4_ndev_ops = {
.ndo_start_xmit = enetc_xmit,
.ndo_get_stats = enetc_get_stats,
.ndo_set_mac_address = enetc_pf_set_mac_addr,
- .ndo_set_rx_mode = enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode,
+ .ndo_set_rx_mode_async = enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode,
.ndo_set_features = enetc4_pf_set_features,
.ndo_vlan_rx_add_vid = enetc_vlan_rx_add_vid,
.ndo_vlan_rx_kill_vid = enetc_vlan_rx_del_vid,
@@ -983,19 +944,6 @@ static void enetc4_link_deinit(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
enetc_mdiobus_destroy(pf);
}
-static int enetc4_psi_wq_task_init(struct enetc_si *si)
-{
- char wq_name[24];
-
- INIT_WORK(&si->rx_mode_task, enetc4_psi_do_set_rx_mode);
- snprintf(wq_name, sizeof(wq_name), "enetc-%s", pci_name(si->pdev));
- si->workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue(wq_name);
- if (!si->workqueue)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int enetc4_pf_netdev_create(struct enetc_si *si)
{
struct device *dev = &si->pdev->dev;
@@ -1036,12 +984,6 @@ static int enetc4_pf_netdev_create(struct enetc_si *si)
if (err)
goto err_link_init;
- err = enetc4_psi_wq_task_init(si);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to init workqueue\n");
- goto err_wq_init;
- }
-
err = register_netdev(ndev);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to register netdev\n");
@@ -1051,8 +993,6 @@ static int enetc4_pf_netdev_create(struct enetc_si *si)
return 0;
err_reg_netdev:
- destroy_workqueue(si->workqueue);
-err_wq_init:
enetc4_link_deinit(priv);
err_link_init:
enetc_free_msix(priv);
@@ -1070,8 +1010,6 @@ static void enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(struct enetc_si *si)
struct net_device *ndev = si->ndev;
unregister_netdev(ndev);
- cancel_work(&si->rx_mode_task);
- destroy_workqueue(si->workqueue);
enetc4_link_deinit(priv);
enetc_free_msix(priv);
free_netdev(ndev);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 2:57 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/14] net: enetc: cleanups and improvements wei.fang
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/14] net: enetc: extract common helpers for MAC promiscuous mode setting wei.fang
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/14] net: enetc: extract common helpers for MAC hash filter configuration wei.fang
2026-07-03 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 7:02 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-07-02 2:57 ` wei.fang [this message]
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/14] net: enetc: improve MAFT entry management with bitmap tracking wei.fang
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/14] net: enetc: use PCI device name for debugfs directory wei.fang
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/14] net: enetc: simplify enetc4_set_port_speed() wei.fang
2026-07-02 17:32 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-07-03 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/14] net: enetc: differentiate phylink capabilities for pseudo-MAC and standalone MAC wei.fang
2026-07-02 17:30 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-07-03 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/14] net: enetc: remove invalid code from enetc4_pl_mac_link_up() wei.fang
2026-07-02 17:35 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/14] net: enetc: remove enetc4_set_default_si_vlan_promisc() wei.fang
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/14] net: enetc: refactor SI VLAN promiscuous mode configuration wei.fang
2026-07-03 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/14] net: enetc: move enetc_set_si_vlan_promisc() to enetc_pf_common.c wei.fang
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 12/14] net: enetc: remove redundant num_vsi field from enetc_port_caps wei.fang
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 13/14] net: enetc: use alloc_etherdev_mqs() to create netdev for VF driver wei.fang
2026-07-03 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 2:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 14/14] net: enetc: use kzalloc_flex() for enetc_psfp_gate allocation wei.fang
2026-07-03 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702025714.456233-4-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com \
--to=wei.fang@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.