From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 context switching
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:43:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702164310.03AAC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702160248.1377250-24-maz@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Cross-VM Information Leak via unswitched SYS_NVHCR_EL2 physical register
--
commit ce2ffdc8cef6935283480a976d01a70bb788a885
Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 context switching
This commit adds context switching for the NVHCR_EL2 register to manage
the HCR_EL2 state of an EL1 guest. The switch is conditional on the guest
using NV3.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/sysreg-sr.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,10 @@ static inline void __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>
> if (ctxt_has_sctlr2(ctxt))
> ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SCTLR2_EL1) = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR2);
> +
> + /* Retrieve L2's HCR_EL2, and save it for future use */
> + if (is_nested_nv3_ctxt(ctxt_to_vcpu(ctxt)))
> + ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, NVHCR_EL2) = read_sysreg_s(SYS_NVHCR_EL2);
[Severity: High]
Could this leak information between VMs when the host hardware supports NV3
but the guest doesn't have it enabled?
If the host hardware implements FEAT_NV3 and runs an L2 guest with physical
HCR_EL2.NV=1, the hardware will redirect EL1 accesses of HCR_EL2 to the
physical SYS_NVHCR_EL2 register.
Since is_nested_nv3_ctxt() evaluates to false when the guest lacks the
virtual NV3 capability, __sysreg_save_el1_state() skips saving this register.
Does this allow an untrusted L2 guest to read the SYS_NVHCR_EL2 state left
behind by a previously running VM, bypassing software isolation?
> }
>
[ ... ]
> @@ -285,6 +289,13 @@ static inline void __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt,
>
> if (ctxt_has_sctlr2(ctxt))
> write_sysreg_el1(ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, SCTLR2_EL1), SYS_SCTLR2);
> +
> + /*
> + * Publish the L2 view of HCR_EL2 to the HW if L1 is using NV3.
> + * Otherwise, the data is already in place in the L1's own VNCR.
> + */
> + if (is_nested_nv3_ctxt(ctxt_to_vcpu(ctxt)))
> + write_sysreg_s(ctxt_sys_reg(ctxt, NVHCR_EL2), SYS_NVHCR_EL2);
[Severity: High]
Similar to the save path above in __sysreg_save_el1_state(), should this
context switch be based on the host's hardware capability rather than the
guest's software configuration?
If the physical register isn't explicitly overwritten in
__sysreg_restore_el1_state() because is_nested_nv3_ctxt() is false, the
L2 guest could potentially read the stale configuration state of a
completely different VM.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702160248.1377250-1-maz@kernel.org?part=23
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 16:02 [PATCH 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_NV2p1 and FEAT_NV3 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/28] arm64: sysreg: Emit RESx/UNKN values for Mapping definitions Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 17:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/28] arm64: Update ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1 description to 2026-03 JSON release Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/28] KVM: arm64: Merge guest's HCRX_EL2 using NV_HCRX_GUEST_EXCLUDE Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/28] KVM: arm64: Drop __HCRX_EL2_* masks Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/28] KVM: arm64: Plumb HCRX_EL2.SRMASKEn in HCRX_EL2 sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/28] KVM: arm64: Classify CPTR_EL2 as a SR_LOC_SPECIAL register Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/28] KVM: arm64: Don't evaluate HCR_EL2.NV on ERET fast path Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 17:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/28] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NV2P1 capability Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/28] KVM: arm64: Relax CPTR_EL2 handling when FEAT_NV2p1 is present Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 10/28] KVM: arm64: Relax CNTHCTL_EL2 " Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 17:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 11/28] KVM: arm64: Expose FEAT_NV2p1 to NV guests Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 12/28] arm64: Add FEAT_NV2p1 detection Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 13/28] arm64: sysreg: Add NVHCR_EL2 description as a mirror of HCR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 14/28] arm64: sysreg: Add HCRX_EL2 bits related to FEAT_NV3 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 15/28] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NV3 capability Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 16/28] KVM: arm64: Split NV-specific exit fixups from the non-NV handling Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 17/28] KVM: arm64: Add NV3 control bits to HCRX_EL2 sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 18/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_has_nv{2,3}() predicates Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 19/28] KVM: arm64: Make HCR_EL2 a non-VNCR register Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 20/28] KVM: arm64: Add sanitisation for NVHCR_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 21/28] KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 handling to the sysreg array Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 22/28] KVM: arm64: Add routing for NVHCR_EL2 trap Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 18:14 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 context switching Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-02 20:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 24/28] KVM: arm64: Engage NV3 ERET trap elision Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 25/28] KVM: arm64: Engage NV3 TLBI " Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 21:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 26/28] KVM: arm64: Add FEAT_NV3 detection Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 20:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 27/28] KVM: arm64: Expose FEAT_NV3 to guests Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 20:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-02 16:02 ` [PATCH 28/28] arm64: Add override for ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.NV_frac Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702164310.03AAC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.