From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF68331ED7 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 19:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783107913; cv=none; b=LGkYqVxujL1anz8RZc2QyiGSi9XXuwDJ1p37g9dldjCI9h01M2Db1IZG4YdTu4AEf1OnPsopQgx5Xzk/cGGBFdeSmMwZ/mD9KIapNp2x8RU+UdeB425YWg6AFcAJLrEfL9qnn1JDY7TcqYLa8njJAkpA5+iiKFXFfqC28ygBj8w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783107913; c=relaxed/simple; bh=THaxPbCVZTkRX3OPEzwjI3+kzUugZ8ls7MX5Ls7Tigc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=ujzwxEUhcft0ajfIrG8UmvqmIl0LOxePYWG/dC577HuYlI+PHaWrKhpBv08YZ1ChEbBo4e1pAflDAqKWbYgwmvlWNsQPNSQ97vOdVEZHNaAz+TEevc0p4PlwZPm2sc5i2zFIbKJ8xPk3KUpc8l0G6hUGmnSp4zhx17RKG7SzBRg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HfipuKoq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HfipuKoq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73EA61F000E9; Fri, 3 Jul 2026 19:45:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783107912; bh=xKTF6vDNUBQAI9jFuD7VQkJvNOUNn1t8G/tpgnpCDhQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=HfipuKoqA9YbTNTFO5CPy2Y4hov7rjwC1UoEu3ip3PLY4OVaz8/MocBxkxf6Ex5MB ulQf0ZXbHchbTPLaLuhb4kc0W4BsTDHWs5DJ2r27N3saK0sQemoeoHJ1fsdhCSs30L sfEFUWvv6QDLnh9AOnVTlmVTVxiFda76c8Fss4vPfaRrV68xiAWAJ6dL5i/czdkdoZ jKQ0CFVp0O6cl9KRIMYv6WDxVwMI7z1qRzkQ9hv3XzrJ7YC86C+sTMCRPIJi/1yU4v cnecisgkzaIt1MPB8p3PbvrVbsylFXGhjeZKAgPq+eBxpEP21RjPdrIjUabD6tucx/ A703xqyo6MPeA== From: SJ Park To: Mike Rapoport Cc: SJ Park , Lorenzo Stoakes , Andrew Morton , Usama Arif , david@kernel.org, chrisl@kernel.org, kasong@tencent.com, ziy@nvidia.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, Baoquan He , willy@infradead.org, youngjun.park@lge.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, alex@ghiti.fr, kas@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, npache@redhat.com, "Liam R. Howlett" , ryan.roberts@arm.com, Vlastimil Babka , lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nphamcs@gmail.com, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: preparatory patches for PMD level swap entries Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 12:45:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20260703194502.102044-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:08:03 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > +cc Mike re: CI. > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 04:46:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 09:04:33 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 12:50:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 09:34:37 -0700 Usama Arif wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This is the preparatory part of the PMD page table swapin work. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > This comes reasonably reviewed, so I'll queue it in mm-new. > > > > > > > > > > Why? > > > > > > > > > > - Human review coverage and AI review make me believe this isn't the > > > > > final version at all, but I do believe this is something we want in > > > > > 7.2, and getting it under test early will help to push it along. > > > > > > > > > > - Getting it in there early means that others will base their work on > > > > > material which will probably be upstreamed this cycle, so this gives > > > > > them a more accurate base against which to work. > > > > > > > > > > Sashiko did find a lot to talk about, some of it pre-existing so can > > > > > people who work on this code please take a look at > > > > > > > > > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630164143.1595669-1-usama.arif@linux.dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hm, my understanding was that mm-new is where we take everything submitted for > > > > early testing? > > > > > > > > Did something change? > > > > > > mm-new has always been a few day front-end to mm-unstable. To protect > > > linux-next from brand new material. It serves no other purpose. > > > > Well it only serves a purpose if it gives us better testing. > > > > We have a CI running tests now though, Mike - is that predicated on material > > being in mm-new or does it just grab the email? > > CI grabs patches from patchwork and tries to apply them to one of the three > bases: mm-unstable, mm-new or the latest Linus' commit merged into mm.git. > > If patches apply, the other bases are not checked. > > This patches applied cleanly to mm-unstable and successfully passed (at > least once :) ) > https://github.com/linux-mm/linux-mm/actions/runs/28544575927/ Awesome! I found the CI script (mm-ci) on the GitHub organization. Is the repo open to contributions? If so, between GitHub PR and patches to linux-mm@ what is more preferred? Seems it is not running DAMON specific tests, and I want to add DAMON kunit test to the test set as a first step (DAMO selftest is bit flaky on some systems), if people don't mind. I or someone else may also want to add more tests like Cc list checking [1] in future. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/20260703190421.100480-1-sj@kernel.org Thanks, SJ [...]