From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Ching-Te Ku" <ku920601@realtek.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
0day robot <lkp@intel.com>, "Ping-Ke Shih" <pkshih@realtek.com>
Subject: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:7957:51: warning: overlapping comparisons always evaluate to true
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 22:00:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202607032153.rVIyuBbI-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ping-Ke-Shih/wifi-rtw89-coex-Add-Init-info-version-10/20260703-195949
head: 3838fb6a6e17533236a69064edbe55af1024858b
commit: 868edae4d5e556502d903a8c6bea0b9d3f5558a9 wifi: rtw89: coex: Add WiFi/Bluetooth adapter binding info
date: 8 hours ago
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260703/202607032153.rVIyuBbI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ca7933e47d3a3451d81e72ac174dcb5aa28b59d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260703/202607032153.rVIyuBbI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202607032153.rVIyuBbI-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:7957:51: warning: overlapping comparisons always evaluate to true [-Wtautological-overlap-compare]
7957 | if (wl->role_info.link_mode != BTC_WLINK_2G_MCC ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~
7958 | wl->role_info.link_mode != BTC_WLINK_25G_MCC ||
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
vim +7957 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
7909
7910 #define _bind_is_btonly 0x7
7911 static void _set_coex_binding(struct rtw89_btc *btc)
7912 {
7913 struct rtw89_btc_cx *cx = &btc->cx;
7914 struct rtw89_btc_extsoc_info *bt2 = &cx->bt_ext;
7915 struct rtw89_btc_bt_info *bt0 = &cx->bt0;
7916 struct rtw89_btc_bt_info *bt1 = &cx->bt1;
7917 struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &cx->wl;
7918 struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &btc->dm;
7919 u8 path_hwb[BTC_RF_NUM] = {RTW89_PHY_0, RTW89_PHY_1};
7920 u8 wl_rf_band[RTW89_BAND_NUM] = {};
7921 u8 i, j, val = 0;
7922
7923 /*
7924 * sit_xmap(Space-Interaction) = ant_xmap | xtk_xmap
7925 * 1: WL-BT space-interference, always 1 if BTG/BTA/SPDT = 1
7926 * if dedicated-ant, it may be 1 if BT-Tx is bigger than WL-Rx(xtk_xmap)
7927 *
7928 * ant_xmap(ANT-Division-Multiplexing)
7929 * ==> dedicated-ant->0, BTG/BTA/SPDT->1
7930 *
7931 * xtk_xmap(Cross-talk map)-> calculate WL/BT interference by SIR
7932 * ==> 1: interference, 0: no-interference
7933 *
7934 * fdm_map(Frequency-Division-Multiplexing): WL/BT RF_Band overlap-map
7935 * 2bit-map: bit[1]:5GHz/6GHz, bit[0]:2.4GHz
7936 */
7937 for (i = 0; i < RTW89_PHY_NUM; i++) {
7938 if (wl->rf_band_map[i] & BIT(RTW89_BAND_2G))
7939 wl_rf_band[i] |= BIT(RTW89_BAND_2G);
7940
7941 if (wl->rf_band_map[i] & (BIT(RTW89_BAND_5G) | BIT(RTW89_BAND_6G)))
7942 wl_rf_band[i] |= BIT(RTW89_BAND_5G);
7943
7944 dm->fit_xmap[i][BTC_BT_1ST] = wl_rf_band[i] & bt0->rf_band_map;
7945 dm->fit_xmap[i][BTC_BT_2ND] = wl_rf_band[i] & bt1->rf_band_map;
7946 dm->fit_xmap[i][BTC_BT_EXT] = wl_rf_band[i] & bt2->rf_band_map;
7947 }
7948
7949 /*
7950 * if MR_WTYPE_MLD2L1R_NONMLD, FW will change 2+0/0+2/1+1
7951 * Therefore, BTC_MLO_RF_xxx is not real-time state.
7952 * if link mode change by _ntfy_generic(BTC_GNTFY_MRCX_INFO)
7953 * the HW-BAND is decided by wl->mlo_info.mrcx_act_hwb_map
7954 * In this case, BTC_RF_S0->HWB0, BTC_RF_S1->HWB1
7955 */
7956 if (wl->mlo_info.wtype == RTW89_MR_WTYPE_MLD2L1R_NONMLD) {
> 7957 if (wl->role_info.link_mode != BTC_WLINK_2G_MCC ||
7958 wl->role_info.link_mode != BTC_WLINK_25G_MCC ||
7959 wl->role_info.link_mode != BTC_WLINK_25G_DBCC) {/* mode chg */
7960 if (wl->mlo_info.mrcx_act_hwb_map == BIT(RTW89_PHY_1))
7961 path_hwb[BTC_RF_S0] = RTW89_PHY_1;/* S0/1->HWB1 */
7962 else
7963 path_hwb[BTC_RF_S1] = RTW89_PHY_0;/* S0/1->HWB0 */
7964 }
7965 } else {
7966 if (wl->mlo_info.rf_combination == BTC_MLO_RF_2_PLUS_0)
7967 path_hwb[BTC_RF_S1] = RTW89_PHY_0; /* 2+0 RF-S0/1->HWB0 */
7968 else if (wl->mlo_info.rf_combination == BTC_MLO_RF_0_PLUS_2)
7969 path_hwb[BTC_RF_S0] = RTW89_PHY_1; /* 2+0 RF-S0/1->HWB1 */
7970 }
7971
7972 /*
7973 * tdd_map = sit_xmap * fdm_map, 1: WL-RF-Sx vs. BTx take TDD-Action
7974 * fdd_map =(!sit_xmap) * fdm_map, 1: WL-RF-Sx vs.BTx take FDD-Action
7975 * co-rx map = ant_xmap * fdm_map 1:WL/BT co-rx (for halbb-btg-ctrl)
7976 * sit_xmap,ant_xmap = 0 or 1, so tdd/fdd use multiplication (*)
7977 */
7978
7979 for (i = 0; i < BTC_RF_NUM; i++)
7980 for (j = 0; j < BTC_ALL_BT_EZL; j++) {
7981 dm->tdd_map[i][j] = dm->sit_xmap[i][j] *
7982 dm->fit_xmap[path_hwb[i]][j];
7983 dm->fdd_map[i][j] = !dm->sit_xmap[i][j] *
7984 dm->fit_xmap[path_hwb[i]][j];
7985 dm->corx_map[i][j] = dm->ant_xmap[i][j] *
7986 dm->fit_xmap[path_hwb[i]][j];
7987 }
7988
7989 /* TDD-Binding */
7990 _set_bind_info(btc, BTC_MECH_TDD);
7991
7992 /* FDD-Binding */
7993 _set_bind_info(btc, BTC_MECH_FDD);
7994
7995 dm->out_of_band = !dm->tdd_bind.rf_band && !dm->fdd_bind.rf_band;
7996 dm->fdd_en = !!dm->fdd_bind.rf_band;
7997 dm->tdd_en = !!dm->tdd_bind.rf_band;
7998
7999 /* set BT on/off state for GNT_WL Combined-MUX control */
8000 if (bt0->enable.now)
8001 val |= BIT(0);
8002
8003 if (bt1->enable.now)
8004 val |= BIT(1);
8005
8006 if (bt2->func_type)
8007 val |= BIT(2);
8008
8009 dm->ost_info.bt_enable_state = dm->bt_only ? _bind_is_btonly : val;
8010 }
8011
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 20:00 kernel test robot [this message]
2026-07-06 3:18 ` drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c:7957:51: warning: overlapping comparisons always evaluate to true Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202607032153.rVIyuBbI-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ku920601@realtek.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.