From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pengpeng Hou" <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: cadence: add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 12:36:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260704123629.383BA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260704122835.14277-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Probe function silently masks initialization failures by returning 0 in its error path.
- [High] Driver data type mismatch leads to out-of-bounds memory access and kernel panic on shutdown and suspend.
--
commit 614cbd9081a5fd803fcc9fe1b172469d540e733c
Author: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
PCI: cadence: add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()
The driver has an OF match table wired to .of_match_table, but does
not export the table with MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE().
Add the missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ...) entry so module alias
information is generated for OF based module autoloading.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c
> index b067a3296dd37..a1ea24fc3b63f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id cdns_plat_pcie_of_match[] = {
> },
> {},
> };
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cdns_plat_pcie_of_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver cdns_plat_pcie_driver = {
> .driver = {
[Severity: High]
This isn't a regression introduced by this patch, but I noticed a pre-existing
regression with error handling in the probe function in this file.
In drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c:cdns_plat_pcie_probe():
ret = cdns_pcie_ep_setup(ep);
if (ret)
goto err_init;
...
err_init:
err_get_sync:
pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
cdns_pcie_disable_phy(cdns_plat_pcie->pcie);
phy_count = cdns_plat_pcie->pcie->phy_count;
while (phy_count--)
device_link_del(cdns_plat_pcie->pcie->link[phy_count]);
return 0;
Should this error path return the actual error code instead of returning 0?
Returning 0 unconditionally masks the probe failure. Does this cause the
driver core to register the device as successfully probed even when PHY or
host/endpoint setup fails, potentially leading to undefined behavior later?
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing regression, but there appears to be a driver data
type mismatch that could lead to out-of-bounds memory access during shutdown
and suspend.
In drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-plat.c:cdns_plat_pcie_probe(),
the driver data is set to a struct cdns_plat_pcie pointer:
cdns_plat_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cdns_plat_pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
...
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cdns_plat_pcie);
However, in cdns_plat_pcie_shutdown(), it is retrieved and cast as a
struct cdns_pcie pointer:
static void cdns_plat_pcie_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct cdns_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
...
cdns_pcie_disable_phy(pcie);
}
The same incorrect cast happens in drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
during suspend and resume operations:
static int cdns_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct cdns_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
cdns_pcie_disable_phy(pcie);
return 0;
}
static int cdns_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct cdns_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
int ret;
ret = cdns_pcie_enable_phy(pcie);
...
}
Since struct cdns_plat_pcie is an 8-byte wrapper containing the actual struct
cdns_pcie pointer, does casting it directly to struct cdns_pcie cause
cdns_pcie_disable_phy() and cdns_pcie_enable_phy() to read out-of-bounds
memory when accessing fields like pcie->phy_count and pcie->phy?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260704122835.14277-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-04 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-04 12:28 [PATCH] PCI: cadence: add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() Pengpeng Hou
2026-07-04 12:36 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-07 6:12 ` Aksh Garg
2026-07-09 12:36 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260704123629.383BA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.