From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,jackmanb@google.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-page_alloc-relax-gfp-warn-in-nolock-allocs.patch added to mm-new branch
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:31:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260705073131.A591F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm/page_alloc: relax GFP WARN in nolock allocs
has been added to the -mm mm-new branch. Its filename is
mm-page_alloc-relax-gfp-warn-in-nolock-allocs.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-page_alloc-relax-gfp-warn-in-nolock-allocs.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-new branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Note, mm-new is a provisional staging ground for work-in-progress
patches, and acceptance into mm-new is a notification for others take
notice and to finish up reviews. Please do not hesitate to respond to
review feedback and post updated versions to replace or incrementally
fixup patches in mm-new.
The mm-new branch of mm.git is not included in linux-next
If a few days of testing in mm-new is successful, the patch will me moved
into mm.git's mm-unstable branch, which is included in linux-next
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: mm/page_alloc: relax GFP WARN in nolock allocs
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 12:31:46 +0000
This WARN forbids setting other flags than __GFP_ACCOUNT but we
unconditionally set the ones in gfp_nolock so they are certainly fine for
the caller to set.
There are other GFP flags that are almost certainly fine to set here;
Willy noted GFP_HIGHMEM, GFP_DMA, GFP_MOVABLE and GFP_HARDWALL. But,
nolock allocation is rather special, so be conservative to try and ensure
we have a chance to think carefully before nontrivial new usecases arise.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260703-alloc-trylock-v5-6-c87b714e19d3@google.com
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ajS96fWbG4dzP3u3@casper.infradead.org/
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Harry Yoo (Oracle) <harry@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-relax-gfp-warn-in-nolock-allocs
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5355,7 +5355,8 @@ struct page *__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof
return NULL;
if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NOLOCK) {
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(gfp & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
+ /* Certain other flags could be supported later if needed. */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(gfp & ~(__GFP_ACCOUNT | gfp_nolock));
if (!alloc_nolock_allowed())
return NULL;
gfp |= gfp_nolock;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jackmanb@google.com are
mm-page_alloc-drop-flag-conversion-optimisation.patch
mm-secretmem-disable-under-highmem.patch
mm-page_alloc-rename-alloc_trylock-alloc_nolock.patch
mm-page_alloc-some-renames-to-clarify-alloc_flags-scopes.patch
mm-name-some-args-in-a-function-declaration.patch
mm-split-out-internal-page_alloch.patch
mm-page_alloc-unify-__alloc_frozen_pages_noprof.patch
mm-page_alloc-relax-gfp-warn-in-nolock-allocs.patch
mm-move-some-stuff-to-mm-page_alloch.patch
perf-x86-intel-use-higher-level-allocator-api.patch
kvm-vmx-use-higher-level-allocator-api.patch
x86-virt-use-higher-level-allocator-api.patch
sgi-xp-use-higher-level-allocator-api.patch
net-funeth-switch-to-higher-level-allocator-api.patch
mm-remove-__alloc_pages_node.patch
mm-move-__alloc_pages-to-mm-page_alloch.patch
mm-replace-__gfp_no_codetag-with-alloc_no_codetag.patch
mm-page_alloc-drop-alloc_flags-arg-from-alloc_flags_cma.patch
mm-factor-out-can_spin_trylock.patch
reply other threads:[~2026-07-05 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260705073131.A591F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.