All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,sashiko-bot@kernel.org,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,giometti@enneenne.com,calvin@wbinvd.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + pps-dont-try-to-wait-for-negative-timeouts-in-pps_fetch.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2026 13:20:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260705202027.ED1441F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: pps: don't try to wait for negative timeouts in PPS_FETCH
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     pps-dont-try-to-wait-for-negative-timeouts-in-pps_fetch.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/pps-dont-try-to-wait-for-negative-timeouts-in-pps_fetch.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
Subject: pps: don't try to wait for negative timeouts in PPS_FETCH
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 11:52:09 -0700

If userspace passes a negative timeout to PPS_FETCH, it triggers a kernel
splat from schedule_timeout():

    schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value fffffffffff0bfb4
    CPU: 17 UID: 0 PID: 4720 Comm: a.out Not tainted 7.1.0-rc5-x86-kvm-00150-g331d97e36b37 #1 PREEMPT_RT
    Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-20240910_120124-localhost 04/01/2014
    Call Trace:
     <TASK>
     dump_stack_lvl+0x4b/0x70
     schedule_timeout+0xb7/0xe0
     pps_cdev_pps_fetch.isra.0+0x93/0x150
     pps_cdev_ioctl+0x70/0x310
     __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xc0
     do_syscall_64+0xb6/0xfc0
     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

Here is a trivial reproducer that works with the PPS_CLIENT_KTIMER test
device enabled in the kernel:

    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <fcntl.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <sys/ioctl.h>
    #include <linux/pps.h>
    #include <err.h>

    int main() {
        struct pps_fdata fdata;
        int fd;

        fd = open("/dev/pps0", O_RDWR);
        if (fd == -1)
            err(1, "Failed to open /dev/pps0");

        fdata.timeout.sec = -1;
        fdata.timeout.nsec = 0;

        if (ioctl(fd, PPS_FETCH, &fdata))
            err(2, "PPS_FETCH failed");

        close(fd);
        return 0;
    }

Sashiko imagines this to be some sort of security problem, which is
obviously really silly.  But I think it is still worth fixing, so buggy
userspace code can't trigger the splat.

Silence the splat by using timespec64_to_jiffies(), which hard limits the
timeout to LONG_MAX jiffies.  To be safe, explicitly preserve the
-ETIMEDOUT return value userspace sees today if it passes a negative
timeout.

If you really squint, this is still a slight behavior change in that there
are "denormalized" combinations of tv_sec and tv_nsec which used to work
but will now return -ETIMEDOUT.  I can't imagine anybody will care about
that...

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/c5c97c3b3c9d66010382094fd538e59a38f4aacf.1781289959.git.calvin@wbinvd.org
Fixes: eae9d2ba0cfc ("LinuxPPS: core support")
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1779733602.git.calvin%40wbinvd.org?part=3
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/pps/pps.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pps/pps.c~pps-dont-try-to-wait-for-negative-timeouts-in-pps_fetch
+++ a/drivers/pps/pps.c
@@ -66,13 +66,19 @@ static int pps_cdev_pps_fetch(struct pps
 		err = wait_event_interruptible(pps->queue,
 				ev != pps->last_ev);
 	else {
+		struct timespec64 ts;
 		unsigned long ticks;
 
 		dev_dbg(&pps->dev, "timeout %lld.%09d\n",
 				(long long) fdata->timeout.sec,
 				fdata->timeout.nsec);
-		ticks = fdata->timeout.sec * HZ;
-		ticks += fdata->timeout.nsec / (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
+
+		if (fdata->timeout.sec < 0)
+			return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+		ts.tv_sec = fdata->timeout.sec;
+		ts.tv_nsec = fdata->timeout.nsec;
+		ticks = timespec64_to_jiffies(&ts);
 
 		if (ticks != 0) {
 			err = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from calvin@wbinvd.org are

pps-dont-try-to-wait-for-negative-timeouts-in-pps_fetch.patch
pps-dont-allow-pps_kc_bind-on-removed-devices.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-07-05 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260705202027.ED1441F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=calvin@wbinvd.org \
    --cc=giometti@enneenne.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.