From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v9 10/10] perf tests: Add SIMD registers sampling test
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 10:34:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706023444.3067660-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706023444.3067660-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Validate that SIMD registers (XMM/YMM/ZMM on x86) can be sampled
correctly with hardware support.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
index 48c722e563e2..c98d8028d0b7 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh
@@ -256,6 +256,136 @@ test_egpr_register_capture() {
echo "eGPR/SSP register capture test [Success]"
}
+extract_x86_advertised_simd_classes() {
+ local regs_output="$1"
+
+ echo "${regs_output}" \
+ | grep -oE '(ZMM|YMM|XMM|OPMASK)[0-9]+-[0-9]+' \
+ | sed -E 's/[0-9]+-[0-9]+$//' \
+ | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' \
+ | sort -u
+}
+
+ordered_x86_simd_classes() {
+ local advertised_classes="$1"
+ local simd_classes=""
+
+ if echo "${advertised_classes}" | grep -qw zmm
+ then
+ simd_classes="${simd_classes} zmm"
+ fi
+ if echo "${advertised_classes}" | grep -qw ymm
+ then
+ simd_classes="${simd_classes} ymm"
+ fi
+ if echo "${advertised_classes}" | grep -qw xmm
+ then
+ simd_classes="${simd_classes} xmm"
+ fi
+ if echo "${advertised_classes}" | grep -qw opmask
+ then
+ simd_classes="${simd_classes} opmask"
+ fi
+
+ echo "${simd_classes}" | xargs
+}
+
+validate_simd_sampling_mode() {
+ local regs_opt="$1"
+ local simd_classes="$2"
+ local script_field="$3"
+ local simd_class
+ local sample_output
+
+ for simd_class in ${simd_classes}
+ do
+ if ! sample_output=$(perf record -o - "${regs_opt}=${simd_class}" \
+ -e br_inst_retired.near_call -c 1000 --per-thread ${testprog} 2> /dev/null \
+ | perf script -F ip,sym,"${script_field}" -i - 2> /dev/null)
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Failed record ${regs_opt}=${simd_class}]"
+ return 1
+ fi
+
+ if ! has_required_regs "${sample_output}" "${simd_class}"
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Failed missing ${simd_class} sampling data]"
+ return 1
+ fi
+ done
+
+ return 0
+}
+
+test_simd_register_capture() {
+ local arch
+ local intr_regs
+ local user_regs
+ local simd_classes
+ local user_simd_classes
+ local advertised_intr_classes
+ local advertised_user_classes
+ local tested=0
+
+ echo "SIMD register capture test"
+ if ! perf list pmu | grep -q 'br_inst_retired.near_call'
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Skipped missing event]"
+ return
+ fi
+
+ intr_regs=$(perf record --intr-regs=\? 2>&1 || true)
+ user_regs=$(perf record --user-regs=\? 2>&1 || true)
+
+ simd_classes=""
+ user_simd_classes=""
+
+ arch=$(uname -m)
+ case ${arch} in
+ x86_64|i386)
+ advertised_intr_classes=$(extract_x86_advertised_simd_classes "${intr_regs}")
+ advertised_user_classes=$(extract_x86_advertised_simd_classes "${user_regs}")
+
+ simd_classes=$(ordered_x86_simd_classes "${advertised_intr_classes}")
+ user_simd_classes=$(ordered_x86_simd_classes "${advertised_user_classes}")
+ ;;
+ *)
+ ;;
+ esac
+
+ if [ -z "${simd_classes}" ]
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Skipped missing intr SIMD registers]"
+ elif ! validate_simd_sampling_mode "--intr-regs" "${simd_classes}" "iregs"
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Failed missing intr SIMD register sampling data]"
+ err=1
+ return
+ else
+ tested=1
+ fi
+
+ if [ -z "${user_simd_classes}" ]
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Skipped missing user SIMD registers]"
+ elif ! validate_simd_sampling_mode "--user-regs" "${user_simd_classes}" "uregs"
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Failed missing user SIMD register sampling data]"
+ err=1
+ return
+ else
+ tested=1
+ fi
+
+ if [ ${tested} -eq 0 ]
+ then
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Skipped missing SIMD registers]"
+ return
+ fi
+
+ echo "SIMD register capture test [Success]"
+}
+
test_system_wide() {
echo "Basic --system-wide mode test"
local ret=0
@@ -575,6 +705,7 @@ fi
test_per_thread
test_register_capture
test_egpr_register_capture
+test_simd_register_capture
test_system_wide
test_workload
test_branch_counter
--
2.34.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 2:34 [Patch v9 00/10] Perf tools: Support eGPRs/SSP/SIMD registers sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 01/10] perf dwarf-regs: Fix DWARF register index bounds check Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 02/10] perf util: Add missed fields in _attr__fprintf() and __attr_swap() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 03/10] tools headers: Sync x86 headers with kernel sources Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 2:05 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 04/10] perf headers: Sync perf_event.h/perf_regs.h with the kernel headers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 05/10] perf regs: Support x86 eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 2:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 06/10] perf regs: Support x86 SIMD registers sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 07/10] perf regs: Enable dumping of SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 2:21 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 08/10] perf dwarf-regs: Add SIMD/eGPRs support for x86 DWARF registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` [Patch v9 09/10] perf tests: Add x86 eGPRs/SSP registers sampling test Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 3:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 2:30 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 2:34 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706023444.3067660-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.