From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Jon Humphreys <j-humphreys@ti.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.18 0/3] ARM: PREEMPT_RT backports
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 11:27:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026070604-washday-tightrope-dcee@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085940.3lUHUu8z@linutronix.de>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:59:40AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2026-07-02 16:06:48 [+0200], Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 04:41:28PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > ARM missed the PREEMPT_RT window for v6.18. The following three patches
> > > have been merged as of v7.1-rc1 and are the missing pieces.
> > >
> > > I've been asked by people if it would be possible to include them in the
> > > stable tree as it would make their life easier.
> >
> > Why can't the -rt patchset just include these? Why put the burden on
> > us?
>
> It is part of the -rt patchset. I've been asked if it would be possible
> to include it (ARM support) as part of -stable tree. I've been looking
> at what is missing and it included two Kconfig changes and one code
> change. This looked small so I thought maybe, why not let's ask. I'm
> sorry if it looked other than asking.
>
> If this puts burden on you and it does not qualify for a stable change
> then it can't be included.
Please let's have new features stick to feature-patchsets like the -rt
kernel is, and not put that burden on us stable maintainers for
something that we don't use :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 14:41 [PATCH v6.18 0/3] ARM: PREEMPT_RT backports Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-29 14:41 ` [PATCH v6.18 1/3] ARM: 9459/1: Disable jump-label on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-29 14:41 ` [PATCH v6.18 2/3] ARM: ensure interrupts are enabled in __do_user_fault() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-29 14:41 ` [PATCH v6.18 3/3] ARM: 9463/1: Allow to enable RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-02 14:06 ` [PATCH v6.18 0/3] ARM: PREEMPT_RT backports Greg KH
2026-07-06 8:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-06 9:27 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-07-06 9:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026070604-washday-tightrope-dcee@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=j-humphreys@ti.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.