From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Taniya Das" <taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add video clock controller on Nord SoC
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:08:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706090835.E38221F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706-nord_videocc_camcc-v1-1-bae3be9e9770@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The new compatible string `qcom,nord-videocc` is added to the top-level `compatible` enum but is omitted from the `if-then` conditional block that enforces the `required-opps` property.
--
commit 3e90aae8332184ade41937f239c5a380bf14e445
Author: Taniya Das <taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com>
dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add video clock controller on Nord SoC
Add compatible string for Nord video clock controller and the bindings
for Nord Qualcomm SoC.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
> index 5d77029bfaf88..9b9878e9b9cfc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ properties:
> enum:
> - qcom,glymur-videocc
> - qcom,kaanapali-videocc
> + - qcom,nord-videocc
> - qcom,sm8450-videocc
> - qcom,sm8475-videocc
> - qcom,sm8550-videocc
[Severity: Medium]
Does qcom,nord-videocc also require the required-opps property like the other
compatible strings in this binding?
If so, is it a regression that this new compatible string was omitted from
the allOf conditional block that enforces it?
For instance, the existing conditional block enforces required-opps for the
other devices:
allOf:
- $ref: qcom,gcc.yaml#
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- qcom,glymur-videocc
- qcom,kaanapali-videocc
- qcom,sm8450-videocc
- qcom,sm8550-videocc
- qcom,sm8750-videocc
- qcom,x1p42100-videocc
then:
required:
- required-opps
Without updating this block, does this allow device trees missing
required-opps for qcom,nord-videocc to pass schema validation?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706-nord_videocc_camcc-v1-0-bae3be9e9770@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 8:57 [PATCH 0/4] clk: qcom: Add video and camera clock controller support for Nord Taniya Das
2026-07-06 8:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add video clock controller on Nord SoC Taniya Das
2026-07-06 9:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06 8:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add support for Camera Clock Controller for Nord Taniya Das
2026-07-08 8:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-07-14 4:58 ` Taniya Das
2026-07-06 8:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: qcom: videocc-nord: Add video clock controller driver " Taniya Das
2026-07-06 9:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 12:17 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-07-06 14:39 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-07-13 9:03 ` Taniya Das
2026-07-06 8:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: camcc: Add support for camera clock controller " Taniya Das
2026-07-06 13:07 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-07-06 14:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706090835.E38221F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=taniya.das@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.