All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Byungchul Park" <byungchul@sk.com>
Cc: ojeda@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>,
	"Chuck Lever" <cel@kernel.org>,
	dlemoal@kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	"Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	tytso@mit.edu, cassel@kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 19/40] dept: apply timeout consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 07:33:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707073337.097CA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706061928.66713-20-byungchul@sk.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing `sdt_might_sleep_end()` cleanup in the error path of wait macros (e.g., `___wait_var_event`, `___wait_event`, `___swait_event`) bypasses `dept_clean_stage()`, leaking the staged wait event state and corrupting DEPT tracking.
--

commit cf04720896ab037609320947c88e8faa57dbddd7
Author: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>

dept: apply timeout consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait

Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the
consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait, assuming an input 'ret' in
___wait_var_event() macro is used as a timeout value.

> diff --git a/include/linux/wait_bit.h b/include/linux/wait_bit.h
> index 179a616ad245a..9885ac4e1ded5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/wait_bit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wait_bit.h
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ extern wait_queue_head_t *__var_waitqueue(void *p);
>  	struct wait_bit_queue_entry __wbq_entry;			\
>  	long __ret = ret; /* explicit shadow */				\
>  									\
> -	sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL);					\
> +	sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, __ret);			\

[Severity: High]
Does this error path properly clean up the dept wait state?

Lower in the ___wait_var_event() macro, if a signal is received it jumps to
__out:

		if (___wait_is_interruptible(state) && __int) {		\
			__ret = __int;					\
			goto __out;					\
		}							\
		
		...
		
	sdt_might_sleep_end();						\
__out:	__ret;								\

Because the goto __out branch skips sdt_might_sleep_end(), does it leave a 
dangling stage context in the dept subsystem's tracking graph?  

If the stage context remains populated, could a subsequent wait on the same
task be incorrectly seen as a nested stage, potentially corrupting dept
tracking or leading to false deadlock reports?

(Note: A similar goto __out pattern skipping sdt_might_sleep_end() also
exists in ___wait_event() in include/linux/wait.h and ___swait_event() in
include/linux/swait.h).

>  	init_wait_var_entry(&__wbq_entry, var,				\
>  			    exclusive ? WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE : 0);		\
>  	for (;;) {							\

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706061928.66713-1-byungchul@sk.com?part=19

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  6:18 [PATCH v19 00/40] DEPT(DEPendency Tracker) Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 01/40] dept: implement " Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 02/40] dept: add single event dependency tracker APIs Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 03/40] dept: add lock " Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 04/40] dept: tie to lockdep and IRQ tracing Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 05/40] dept: add proc knobs to show stats and dependency graph Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 06/40] dept: distinguish each kernel context from another Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 07/40] dept: distinguish each work " Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 08/40] dept: add a mechanism to refill the internal memory pools on running out Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 09/40] dept: record the latest one out of consecutive waits of the same class Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 10/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to wait_for_completion()/complete() Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:18   ` [PATCH v19 10/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:18 ` [PATCH v19 11/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to swait Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 12/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19   ` [PATCH v19 12/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 13/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to hashed-waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19   ` [PATCH v19 13/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 14/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to dma fence Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19   ` [PATCH v19 14/40] dept: apply sdt_might_sleep_{start, end}() " Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 15/40] dept: track timeout waits separately with a new Kconfig Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 16/40] dept: apply timeout consideration to wait_for_completion()/complete() Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 17/40] dept: apply timeout consideration to swait Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 18/40] dept: apply timeout consideration to waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 19/40] dept: apply timeout consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 20/40] dept: apply timeout consideration to dma fence wait Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 21/40] dept: make dept able to work with an external wgen Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 22/40] dept: track PG_locked with dept Byungchul Park
2026-07-06 18:05   ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-07-07  2:35     ` Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 23/40] dept: print staged wait's stacktrace on report Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 24/40] locking/lockdep: prevent various lockdep assertions when lockdep_off()'ed Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 25/40] dept: add documents for dept Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 26/40] cpu/hotplug: use a weaker annotation in AP thread Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 27/40] dept: assign dept map to mmu notifier invalidation synchronization Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 28/40] dept: assign unique dept_key to each distinct dma fence caller Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 29/40] dept: make dept aware of lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn() annotation Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 30/40] dept: make dept stop from working on debug_locks_off() Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 31/40] dept: assign unique dept_key to each distinct wait_for_completion() caller Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 14:18   ` Gary Guo
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 32/40] completion, dept: introduce init_completion_dmap() API Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 33/40] dept: call dept_hardirqs_off() in local_irq_*() regardless of irq state Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 34/40] rcu/update: fix same dept key collision between various types of RCU Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 35/40] dept: introduce APIs to set page usage and use subclasses_evt for the usage Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 36/40] dept: track PG_writeback with dept Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 37/40] SUNRPC: relocate struct rcu_head to the first field of struct rpc_xprt Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 38/40] mm: percpu: increase PERCPU_DYNAMIC_SIZE_SHIFT on DEPT and large PAGE_SIZE Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 39/40] rust: completion: Add __rust_helper to rust_helper_wait_for_completion() Byungchul Park
2026-07-06  6:19 ` [PATCH v19 40/40] dept: implement a basic unit test for dept Byungchul Park
2026-07-07  7:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 11:32 ` [syzbot ci] Re: DEPT(DEPendency Tracker) syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260707073337.097CA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.