From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lkp@intel.com
Subject: ./linux/mm.h:113:21: error: conflicting types for 'kmalloc'; have 'void *(unsigned int, unsigned int)'
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 07:49:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202607070734.M7fpSgzB-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
::::::
:::::: Manual check reason: "low confidence bisect report"
::::::
BCC: lkp@intel.com
CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
TO: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 0e35b9b6ec0ffcc5e23cbdec09f5c622ad532b53
commit: a001cd248ab244633c5fabe4f7c707e13fc1d1cc rseq/selftests: Use weak symbol reference, not definition, to link with glibc
date: 10 months ago
:::::: branch date: 4 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 10 months ago
config: powerpc64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260707/202607070734.M7fpSgzB-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260707/202607070734.M7fpSgzB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Fixes: a001cd248ab2 ("rseq/selftests: Use weak symbol reference, not definition, to link with glibc")
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202607070734.M7fpSgzB-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from ./linux/scatterlist.h:7,
from scatterlist.c:9:
../../include/linux/bug.h:9:9: warning: "BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO" redefined
9 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); }))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../../include/linux/bits.h:30,
from ../../include/linux/../../../include/linux/gfp_types.h:5,
from ../../include/linux/gfp_types.h:1,
from ../../include/linux/gfp.h:6,
from ../../include/linux/slab.h:6,
from scatterlist.c:8:
../../include/linux/build_bug.h:16:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
16 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e, ...) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./linux/scatterlist.h:8:
./linux/mm.h:13:9: warning: "unlikely" redefined
13 | #define unlikely
| ^~~~~~~~
In file included from ../../include/linux/build_bug.h:5:
../../include/linux/compiler.h:150:10: note: this is the location of the previous definition
150 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
| ^~~~~~~~
./linux/mm.h:33:9: warning: "__ALIGN_KERNEL" redefined
33 | #define __ALIGN_KERNEL(x, a) __ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK(x, (typeof(x))(a) - 1)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../../include/vdso/const.h:5,
from ../../include/vdso/bits.h:5,
from ../../include/linux/bits.h:5:
../../include/uapi/linux/const.h:48:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
48 | #define __ALIGN_KERNEL(x, a) __ALIGN_KERNEL_MASK(x, (__typeof__(x))(a) - 1)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./linux/mm.h:63:9: warning: "__PASTE" redefined
63 | #define __PASTE(a,b) ___PASTE(a,b)
| ^~~~~~~
../../include/linux/compiler.h:239:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
239 | #define __PASTE(a, b) ___PASTE(a, b)
| ^~~~~~~
>> ./linux/mm.h:113:21: error: conflicting types for 'kmalloc'; have 'void *(unsigned int, unsigned int)'
113 | static inline void *kmalloc(unsigned int size, unsigned int flags)
| ^~~~~~~
../../include/linux/slab.h:13:7: note: previous declaration of 'kmalloc' with type 'void *(size_t, gfp_t)' {aka 'void *(long unsigned int, gfp_t)'}
13 | void *kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t gfp);
| ^~~~~~~
>> ./linux/mm.h:119:1: error: conflicting types for 'kmalloc_array'; have 'void *(unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int)'
119 | kmalloc_array(unsigned int n, unsigned int size, unsigned int flags)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../include/linux/slab.h:15:7: note: previous declaration of 'kmalloc_array' with type 'void *(size_t, size_t, gfp_t)' {aka 'void *(long unsigned int, long unsigned int, gfp_t)'}
15 | void *kmalloc_array(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t gfp);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
./linux/scatterlist.h:180:64: warning: 'struct folio' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
180 | static inline void sg_set_folio(struct scatterlist *sg, struct folio *folio,
| ^~~~~
./linux/scatterlist.h: In function 'sg_set_folio':
>> ./linux/scatterlist.h:185:34: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct folio'
185 | sg_assign_page(sg, &folio->page);
| ^~
scatterlist.c: At top level:
scatterlist.c:12:10: fatal error: linux/bvec.h: No such file or directory
12 | #include <linux/bvec.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202607070734.M7fpSgzB-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.