All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,  Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdf.kernel@gmail.com,
	 Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] nfc: llcp: convert to getsockopt_iter
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 04:51:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708-getsockopt_phase3-v1-2-d8394f2fc554@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-getsockopt_phase3-v1-0-d8394f2fc554@debian.org>

Convert nfc_llcp_getsockopt() to the getsockopt_iter proto_ops callback.
It takes a sockopt_t and writes each value with copy_to_iter() instead of
a put_user() into optval; the socket layer builds the sockopt_t and copies
the length back. The socket lock and optlen validation are unchanged.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
 net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
index 94850fbe3620d..0f9cd03294074 100644
--- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
+++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c
@@ -302,21 +302,20 @@ static int nfc_llcp_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 }
 
 static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
-			       char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
+			       sockopt_t *opt)
 {
 	struct nfc_llcp_local *local;
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	struct nfc_llcp_sock *llcp_sock = nfc_llcp_sock(sk);
+	u32 miux, remote_miu, remote_lto, remote_rw, rw;
 	int len, err = 0;
-	u32 miux, remote_miu, rw;
 
 	pr_debug("%p optname %d\n", sk, optname);
 
 	if (level != SOL_NFC)
 		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 
-	if (get_user(len, optlen))
-		return -EFAULT;
+	len = opt->optlen;
 
 	if (len < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -337,7 +336,7 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 	switch (optname) {
 	case NFC_LLCP_RW:
 		rw = llcp_sock->rw > LLCP_MAX_RW ? local->rw : llcp_sock->rw;
-		if (put_user(rw, (u32 __user *) optval))
+		if (copy_to_iter(&rw, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
 			err = -EFAULT;
 
 		break;
@@ -346,7 +345,7 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 		miux = be16_to_cpu(llcp_sock->miux) > LLCP_MAX_MIUX ?
 			be16_to_cpu(local->miux) : be16_to_cpu(llcp_sock->miux);
 
-		if (put_user(miux, (u32 __user *) optval))
+		if (copy_to_iter(&miux, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
 			err = -EFAULT;
 
 		break;
@@ -355,19 +354,21 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 		remote_miu = llcp_sock->remote_miu > LLCP_MAX_MIU ?
 				local->remote_miu : llcp_sock->remote_miu;
 
-		if (put_user(remote_miu, (u32 __user *) optval))
+		if (copy_to_iter(&remote_miu, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
 			err = -EFAULT;
 
 		break;
 
 	case NFC_LLCP_REMOTE_LTO:
-		if (put_user(local->remote_lto / 10, (u32 __user *) optval))
+		remote_lto = local->remote_lto / 10;
+		if (copy_to_iter(&remote_lto, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
 			err = -EFAULT;
 
 		break;
 
 	case NFC_LLCP_REMOTE_RW:
-		if (put_user(llcp_sock->remote_rw, (u32 __user *) optval))
+		remote_rw = llcp_sock->remote_rw;
+		if (copy_to_iter(&remote_rw, len, &opt->iter_out) != len)
 			err = -EFAULT;
 
 		break;
@@ -379,8 +380,7 @@ static int nfc_llcp_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 
 	release_sock(sk);
 
-	if (put_user(len, optlen))
-		return -EFAULT;
+	opt->optlen = len;
 
 	return err;
 }
@@ -937,7 +937,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops llcp_sock_ops = {
 	.listen         = llcp_sock_listen,
 	.shutdown       = sock_no_shutdown,
 	.setsockopt     = nfc_llcp_setsockopt,
-	.getsockopt     = nfc_llcp_getsockopt,
+	.getsockopt_iter = nfc_llcp_getsockopt,
 	.sendmsg        = llcp_sock_sendmsg,
 	.recvmsg        = llcp_sock_recvmsg,
 	.mmap           = sock_no_mmap,

-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 11:51 [PATCH net-next 0/2] nfc: llcp: Move to .getsockopt_iter Breno Leitao
2026-07-08 11:51 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] nfc: llcp: widen getsockopt value locals to u32 Breno Leitao
2026-07-08 11:51 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-07-30 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] nfc: llcp: Move to .getsockopt_iter Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708-getsockopt_phase3-v1-2-d8394f2fc554@debian.org \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@ixit.cz \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-linux-nfc@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.