From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Farid Zakaria <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com>,
jannh@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] binfmt_misc: convert entry list to an hlist
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 18:51:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708-work-binfmt_misc-locking-v1-1-a009dd5b56db@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-work-binfmt_misc-locking-v1-0-a009dd5b56db@kernel.org>
The upcoming conversion of the handler lookup to RCU walks cannot use
list_del_init(): reinitializing the forward pointer of a removed entry
would make a concurrent lockless walker standing on that entry loop
back onto it indefinitely. The removal paths do rely on
reinitialization though because bm_{entry,status}_write() and
bm_evict_inode() need to detect whether an entry has already been
unlinked.
hlists support exactly this pattern: hlist_del_init_rcu() keeps the
forward pointer of the removed entry intact for concurrent walkers and
only zeroes ->pprev with hlist_unhashed() serving as the linked test.
Convert the entry list to an hlist now while keeping the rwlock so the
subsequent RCU conversion is a pure locking change. hlist_add_head()
inserts at the head just as list_add() did so lookup precedence
between registered handlers is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
fs/binfmt_misc.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
include/linux/binfmts.h | 2 +-
kernel/user.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_misc.c b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
index 84349fcb93f1..34de1b01e9c2 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ enum {Enabled, Magic};
#define MISC_FMT_OPEN_FILE (1UL << 28)
typedef struct {
- struct list_head list;
+ struct hlist_node node;
unsigned long flags; /* type, status, etc. */
int offset; /* offset of magic */
int size; /* size of magic/mask */
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static Node *search_binfmt_handler(struct binfmt_misc *misc,
Node *e;
/* Walk all the registered handlers. */
- list_for_each_entry(e, &misc->entries, list) {
+ hlist_for_each_entry(e, &misc->entries, node) {
char *s;
int j;
@@ -654,8 +654,8 @@ static struct binfmt_misc *i_binfmt_misc(struct inode *inode)
*
* If the ->evict call was not caused by a super block shutdown but by a write
* to remove the entry or all entries via bm_{entry,status}_write() the entry
- * will have already been removed from the list. We keep the list_empty() check
- * to make that explicit.
+ * will have already been removed from the list. We keep the hlist_unhashed()
+ * check to make that explicit.
*/
static void bm_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
@@ -668,8 +668,8 @@ static void bm_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
misc = i_binfmt_misc(inode);
write_lock(&misc->entries_lock);
- if (!list_empty(&e->list))
- list_del_init(&e->list);
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&e->node))
+ hlist_del_init(&e->node);
write_unlock(&misc->entries_lock);
put_binfmt_handler(e);
}
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void bm_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
static void remove_binfmt_handler(struct binfmt_misc *misc, Node *e)
{
write_lock(&misc->entries_lock);
- list_del_init(&e->list);
+ hlist_del_init(&e->node);
write_unlock(&misc->entries_lock);
locked_recursive_removal(e->dentry, NULL);
}
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static ssize_t bm_entry_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
* read-only. So we only need to take the write lock when we
* actually remove the entry from the list.
*/
- if (!list_empty(&e->list))
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&e->node))
remove_binfmt_handler(i_binfmt_misc(inode), e);
inode_unlock(inode);
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int add_entry(Node *e, struct super_block *sb)
d_make_persistent(dentry, inode);
misc = i_binfmt_misc(inode);
write_lock(&misc->entries_lock);
- list_add(&e->list, &misc->entries);
+ hlist_add_head(&e->node, &misc->entries);
write_unlock(&misc->entries_lock);
simple_done_creating(dentry);
return 0;
@@ -863,8 +863,9 @@ static ssize_t bm_status_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
{
struct binfmt_misc *misc;
int res = parse_command(buffer, count);
- Node *e, *next;
+ struct hlist_node *next;
struct inode *inode;
+ Node *e;
misc = i_binfmt_misc(file_inode(file));
switch (res) {
@@ -890,7 +891,7 @@ static ssize_t bm_status_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
* read-only. So we only need to take the write lock when we
* actually remove the entry from the list.
*/
- list_for_each_entry_safe(e, next, &misc->entries, list)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(e, next, &misc->entries, node)
remove_binfmt_handler(misc, e);
inode_unlock(inode);
@@ -965,7 +966,7 @@ static int bm_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
if (!misc)
return -ENOMEM;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&misc->entries);
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&misc->entries);
rwlock_init(&misc->entries_lock);
/* Pairs with smp_load_acquire() in load_binfmt_misc(). */
diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h
index 2c77e383e737..071da63f2b48 100644
--- a/include/linux/binfmts.h
+++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct linux_binfmt {
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC)
struct binfmt_misc {
- struct list_head entries;
+ struct hlist_head entries;
rwlock_t entries_lock;
bool enabled;
} __randomize_layout;
diff --git a/kernel/user.c b/kernel/user.c
index 7aef4e679a6a..c6a2bfb4d918 100644
--- a/kernel/user.c
+++ b/kernel/user.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC)
struct binfmt_misc init_binfmt_misc = {
- .entries = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_binfmt_misc.entries),
+ .entries = HLIST_HEAD_INIT,
.enabled = true,
.entries_lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_binfmt_misc.entries_lock),
};
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 16:51 [PATCH 0/3] binfmt_misc: use RCU for the handler lookup Christian Brauner
2026-07-08 16:51 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-07-09 10:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] binfmt_misc: convert entry list to an hlist Jori Koolstra
2026-07-08 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] binfmt_misc: use RCU for the handler lookup Christian Brauner
2026-07-08 16:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] binfmt_misc: annotate racy accesses to ->enabled Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708-work-binfmt_misc-locking-v1-1-a009dd5b56db@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.