All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: validate split queue head count before popping
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:43:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709084105-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709100529.41267-1-physicalmtea@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 06:05:29PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
> virtqueue_split_pop() reads the next split avail ring entry after
> virtio_queue_empty_rcu() reports work. Call virtqueue_num_heads() before
> consuming that entry, so an avail index distance larger than the queue
> size is rejected.
> 
> virtqueue_num_heads() also keeps the read barrier needed before the avail
> ring entry is read.
> 
> This prevents an invalid split queue state from being expanded into
> repeated device command processing.
> 
> Link: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/3930
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> ---
> Tested with qemu-system-x86_64 11.0.50, built from origin/master
> f893c46c3931 plus this patch, configured with:
>   --target-list=x86_64-softmmu --enable-kvm --disable-tcg
> 
> The original virtio-iommu live-vring qtest reproducer used for the
> report completed successfully on the patched build without host OOM,
> confirming that this reproducer is fixed by the patch.
> 
>  hw/virtio/virtio.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index f4d86a3655..252bff8641 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -1751,9 +1751,11 @@ static void *virtqueue_split_pop(VirtQueue *vq, size_t sz)
>      if (virtio_queue_empty_rcu(vq)) {
>          goto done;
>      }
> -    /* Needed after virtio_queue_empty(), see comment in
> -     * virtqueue_num_heads(). */
> -    smp_rmb();
> +
> +    rc = virtqueue_num_heads(vq, vq->last_avail_idx);
> +    if (rc <= 0) {
> +        goto done;
> +    }


Do we still need virtio_queue_empty_rcu then? Why?

>      /* When we start there are none of either input nor output. */
>      out_num = in_num = elem_entries = 0;
> -- 
> 2.34.1



  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 10:05 [PATCH] virtio: validate split queue head count before popping Jia Jia
2026-07-09 12:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-07-10  1:34   ` m'te'a physical
2026-07-10  6:21     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-10  7:35       ` [PATCH v2] " Jia Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709084105-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.