From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, "Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 18:23:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709182354.328351F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709-bcm_fixes-v11-4-067ba11bec5c@hartkopp.net>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] `frames_filtered` can exceed `frames_abs` when a throttle timer flushes multiple multiplex frames across a `frames_abs` reset, causing negative reduction percentages.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v11 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics ---
commit 6e9ade605885c93bf1fc795169b773f4a95e422c
Author: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics
This commit fixes a KCSAN data race complaint in bcm_rx_handler() by
converting frames_abs and frames_filtered to atomic operations. It also
moves overflow updates into separate functions and aims to prevent
negative procfs reduction percentages.
> diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
> index af4bb4182bc29..38c3f690c1cd0 100644
> --- a/net/can/bcm.c
> +++ b/net/can/bcm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -290,6 +294,24 @@ static int bcm_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
>
> +static void bcm_update_rx_stats(struct bcm_op *op)
> +{
> + /* prevent overflow of the reduction% calculation in bcm_proc_show() */
> + if (atomic_long_inc_return(&op->frames_abs) > LONG_MAX / 100) {
> + atomic_long_set(&op->frames_filtered, 0);
> + atomic_long_set(&op->frames_abs, 0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void bcm_update_tx_stats(struct bcm_op *op)
> +{
[ ... ]
> @@ -497,12 +519,9 @@ static void bcm_rx_changed(struct bcm_op *op, struct canfd_frame *data)
> {
> struct bcm_msg_head head;
>
> - /* update statistics */
> - op->frames_filtered++;
> -
> - /* prevent statistics overflow */
> - if (op->frames_filtered > ULONG_MAX/100)
> - op->frames_filtered = op->frames_abs = 0;
> + /* update statistics (frames_filtered <= frames_abs) */
> + if (atomic_long_read(&op->frames_abs))
> + atomic_long_inc(&op->frames_filtered);
[Severity: Medium]
Could frames_filtered still exceed frames_abs here if a throttle timer flushes
multiple multiplex frames right after a counter reset?
If frames_abs reaches the LONG_MAX / 100 limit, bcm_update_rx_stats() resets
both counters to 0. If a subsequent frame is received, frames_abs is
incremented to 1.
If an active throttle timer then expires, bcm_rx_thr_flush() iterates and
calls bcm_rx_changed() for previously throttled frames:
net/can/bcm.c:bcm_rx_thr_flush() {
...
/* for MUX filter we start at index 1 */
for (i = 1; i < op->nframes; i++)
updated += bcm_rx_do_flush(op, i);
...
}
Since frames_abs is non-zero (1), the check in bcm_rx_changed() evaluates to
true, and it will increment frames_filtered for each flushed frame.
Because bcm_rx_thr_flush() can process multiple frames at once,
frames_filtered could quickly become larger than frames_abs, which seems to
result in the negative procfs reduction percentages this patch intended to
prevent.
> /* this element is not throttled anymore */
> data->flags &= ~RX_THR;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709-bcm_fixes-v11-0-067ba11bec5c@hartkopp.net?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 17:56 [PATCH v11 00/11] can: bcm: collected fixes - final6 \o/ Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 01/11] can: bcm: defer rx_op deallocation to workqueue to fix thrtimer UAF Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 02/11] can: bcm: fix lockless bound/ifindex race and silent RX_SETUP failure Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 03/11] can: bcm: add locking when updating filter and timer values Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 04/11] can: bcm: fix CAN frame rx/tx statistics Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 05/11] can: bcm: add missing rcu list annotations and operations Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 06/11] can: bcm: extend bcm_tx_lock usage for data and timer updates Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 07/11] can: bcm: validate frame length in bcm_rx_setup() for RTR replies Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 08/11] can: bcm: add missing device refcount for CAN filter removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 09/11] can: bcm: fix stale rx/tx ops after device removal Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 10/11] can: bcm: fix data race on rx_stamp/rx_ifindex in bcm_rx_handler() Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v11 11/11] can: bcm: track a single source interface for ANYDEV timeout/throttle ops Oliver Hartkopp via B4 Relay
2026-07-09 17:56 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2026-07-09 18:43 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709182354.328351F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.