From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v2 08/16] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:22:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710192220.1922433-9-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710192220.1922433-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
AF_RXRPC may generate a notification to the application after a call has
completed because it generates one notification when
rxrpc_input_split_jumbo() queues the final packet and completes the call
and then generates another when rxrpc_input_split_jumbo() does the
aggregated data receive notification at the end of the function.
This might cause the AFS filesystem to malfunction because it tries to
queue the afs_call for processing an extra time. Most of the time this
happens quickly enough that the second queue_work skips, but sometimes this
means that the call work may happen a second time with implications for
afs_call lifetime management.
Fix this by:
(1) Create a lighter version of rxrpc_notify_socket() that's just used to
requeue a call for rxrpc_recvmsg() without creating another
notification.
(2) Move rxrpc_notify_socket() to call_state.c and rename it to
__rxrpc_notify_socket().
(3) Create a wrapper called rxrpc_notify_socket() that skips the
notification if a call is completed.
(4) Make rxrpc_set_call_completion() call __rxrpc_notify_socket() to avoid
the skip-if-completed check.
Fixes: 2d1faf7a0ca3 ("rxrpc: Simplify skbuff accounting in receive path")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@kernel.org
---
include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 1 +
net/rxrpc/call_state.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c | 42 +++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
index 8f3e3967885a..d7c7b04d69fc 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@
EM(rxrpc_call_see_distribute_error, "SEE dist-err") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_input, "SEE input ") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_notify_released, "SEE nfy-rlsd") \
+ EM(rxrpc_call_see_notify_skipped, "SEE nfy-skip") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_recvmsg, "SEE recvmsg ") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_recvmsg_requeue, "SEE recv-rqu") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_recvmsg_requeue_first, "SEE recv-rqF") \
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_state.c b/net/rxrpc/call_state.c
index 6afb54373ebb..6e402312e145 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_state.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_state.c
@@ -7,6 +7,61 @@
#include "ar-internal.h"
+/*
+ * Post a call for attention by the socket or kernel service. Further
+ * notifications are suppressed by putting recvmsg_link on a dummy queue.
+ */
+static void __rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
+{
+ struct rxrpc_sock *rx;
+ struct sock *sk;
+
+ if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags)) {
+ rxrpc_see_call(call, rxrpc_call_see_notify_released);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ rx = rcu_dereference(call->socket);
+ sk = &rx->sk;
+ if (rx && sk->sk_state < RXRPC_CLOSE) {
+ if (call->notify_rx) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
+ call->notify_rx(sk, call, call->user_call_ID);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
+ } else {
+ spin_lock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&call->recvmsg_link)) {
+ rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_get_notify_socket);
+ list_add_tail(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+
+ if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+ _debug("call %ps", sk->sk_data_ready);
+ sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Post a call for attention by the socket or kernel service. Further
+ * notifications are suppressed by putting recvmsg_link on a dummy queue.
+ */
+void rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
+{
+ if (rxrpc_call_is_complete(call)) {
+ rxrpc_see_call(call, rxrpc_call_see_notify_skipped);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ __rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
+}
+
/*
* Transition a call to the complete state.
*/
@@ -25,7 +80,7 @@ bool rxrpc_set_call_completion(struct rxrpc_call *call,
rxrpc_set_call_state(call, RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE);
trace_rxrpc_call_complete(call);
wake_up(&call->waitq);
- rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
+ __rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
return true;
}
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
index efcba4b2e74f..28b2148b5693 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
@@ -17,13 +17,12 @@
#include "ar-internal.h"
/*
- * Post a call for attention by the socket or kernel service. Further
- * notifications are suppressed by putting recvmsg_link on a dummy queue.
+ * Requeue a call for recvmsg() to pick up.
*/
-void rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
+static void rxrpc_requeue_call(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call)
{
- struct rxrpc_sock *rx;
- struct sock *sk;
+ struct rxrpc_sock *rx = rxrpc_sk(sock->sk);
+ struct sock *sk = &rx->sk;
_enter("%d", call->debug_id);
@@ -32,31 +31,18 @@ void rxrpc_notify_socket(struct rxrpc_call *call)
return;
}
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- rx = rcu_dereference(call->socket);
- sk = &rx->sk;
- if (rx && sk->sk_state < RXRPC_CLOSE) {
- if (call->notify_rx) {
- spin_lock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
- call->notify_rx(sk, call, call->user_call_ID);
- spin_unlock_irq(&call->notify_lock);
- } else {
- spin_lock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
- if (list_empty(&call->recvmsg_link)) {
- rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_get_notify_socket);
- list_add_tail(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&call->recvmsg_link)) {
+ rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_get_notify_socket);
+ list_add_tail(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
- _debug("call %ps", sk->sk_data_ready);
- sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
- }
- }
+ if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+ _debug("call %ps", sk->sk_data_ready);
+ sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
_leave("");
}
@@ -561,7 +547,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK) &&
!skb_queue_empty(&call->recvmsg_queue))
- rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
+ rxrpc_requeue_call(sock, call);
goto not_yet_complete;
call_failed:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 19:22 [PATCH net v2 00/16] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 01/16] afs: Fix NULL deref in afs_deliver_cb_init_call_back_state3() David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 02/16] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 03/16] afs: Fix UAF when sending a message David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 04/16] afs: Fix two delivery functions to pass back -EAGAIN David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 05/16] afs: Fix afs_fs_fetch_data() to set call->async David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 06/16] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 07/16] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` David Howells [this message]
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 09/16] afs: Simplify call refcounting David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 10/16] afs: Make afs_put_call() take trace argument David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 11/16] afs: Fix UAF in afs_make_call() David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 12/16] keys: Add refcounting to user-defined key type payload David Howells
2026-07-11 17:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-07-13 8:09 ` David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 13/16] afs: Create a server appdata key David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 14/16] rxrpc: Pass appdata key to rxrpc_call and thence to rxrpc_bundle David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 15/16] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet overqueuing and simplify RESPONSE generation David Howells
2026-07-10 19:22 ` [PATCH net v2 16/16] rxrpc: Remove OOB challenge/response code David Howells
2026-07-13 7:39 ` [PATCH net v2 00/16] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710192220.1922433-9-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.