All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Babanpreet Singh <bbnpreetsingh@gmail.com>
To: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@intel.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Babanpreet Singh <bbnpreetsingh@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: (peci) Fix kernel-doc parameter names in common.h
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:12:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260712081258.7-1-bbnpreetsingh@gmail.com> (raw)

scripts/kernel-doc -Wall -none reports:

  Warning: drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h:39 function parameter 'state' not
  described in 'peci_sensor_need_update'
  Warning: drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h:39 Excess function parameter
  'sensor' description in 'peci_sensor_need_update'
  Warning: drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h:49 function parameter 'state' not
  described in 'peci_sensor_mark_updated'
  Warning: drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h:49 Excess function parameter
  'sensor' description in 'peci_sensor_mark_updated'

Both peci_sensor_need_update() and peci_sensor_mark_updated() take a
pointer to struct peci_sensor_state named 'state', but their kernel-doc
comments document a parameter named 'sensor' and describe it as a
pointer to the sensor data struct. The comments have been out of sync
with the code since the file was added by commit bf3608f338e9 ("hwmon:
peci: Add cputemp driver").

Update the kernel-doc comments to document the 'state' parameter.

No functional change.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-5
Signed-off-by: Babanpreet Singh <bbnpreetsingh@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h b/drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h
index 92a7ee1925bc..5eae9681e385 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/common.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct peci_sensor_data {
 
 /**
  * peci_sensor_need_update() - check whether sensor update is needed or not
- * @sensor: pointer to sensor data struct
+ * @state: pointer to sensor state struct
  *
  * Return: true if update is needed, false if not.
  */
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static inline bool peci_sensor_need_update(struct peci_sensor_state *state)
 
 /**
  * peci_sensor_mark_updated() - mark the sensor is updated
- * @sensor: pointer to sensor data struct
+ * @state: pointer to sensor state struct
  */
 static inline void peci_sensor_mark_updated(struct peci_sensor_state *state)
 {

base-commit: 44696aa3a489d2baf58efa61b37833f100072bee
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-07-12  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-12  8:12 Babanpreet Singh [this message]
2026-07-12  8:14 ` [PATCH] hwmon: (peci) Fix kernel-doc parameter names in common.h sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260712081258.7-1-bbnpreetsingh@gmail.com \
    --to=bbnpreetsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=iwona.winiarska@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.