From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
Cc: Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
Sathesh Edara <sedara@marvell.com>,
Satananda Burla <sburla@marvell.com>,
Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@marvell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>,
David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/3] octeon_ep: fix skb frags overflow in the RX path
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 12:06:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713110606.GD1364329@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706150208.2944898-2-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 11:02:06PM +0800, Maoyi Xie wrote:
> __octep_oq_process_rx() builds an skb for a multi-buffer packet by adding
> one fragment per buffer_size chunk:
>
> data_len = buff_info->len - oq->max_single_buffer_size;
> while (data_len) {
> ...
> skb_add_rx_frag(skb, shinfo->nr_frags, buff_info->page, 0,
> buff_info->len, buff_info->len);
> ...
> }
>
> buff_info->len comes from the device response header
> (be64_to_cpu(resp_hw->length)). Nothing bounds the fragment count against
> MAX_SKB_FRAGS. data_len can be close to 65535. buffer_size defaults to
> about 3776 on 4K pages, so a full packet yields about 18 fragments. That
> is one more than the default MAX_SKB_FRAGS of 17, so skb_add_rx_frag()
> writes past shinfo->frags[].
>
> The fragment count is now checked before build_skb(). A packet that needs
> more fragments than the skb can hold is dropped. octep_oq_drop_rx()
> consumes its descriptors like the build_skb failure path. The same class
> was fixed in other RX paths, including commit 5ffcb7b890f6 ("net: atlantic:
> fix fragment overflow handling in RX path") and commit f0813bcd2d9d ("net:
> wwan: t7xx: fix potential skb->frags overflow in RX path").
>
> Fixes: 37d79d059606 ("octeon_ep: add Tx/Rx processing and interrupt support")
> Co-developed-by: Kaixuan Li <kaixuan.li@ntu.edu.sg>
> Signed-off-by: Kaixuan Li <kaixuan.li@ntu.edu.sg>
> Signed-off-by: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_rx.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_rx.c
> index e6ebc7e44a..bdbed58c7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_rx.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,15 @@ static int __octep_oq_process_rx(struct octep_device *oct,
>
> octep_oq_next_pkt(oq, buff_info, &read_idx, &desc_used);
>
> + if (buff_info->len > oq->max_single_buffer_size) {
> + u16 data_len = buff_info->len - oq->max_single_buffer_size;
> +
> + if (DIV_ROUND_UP(data_len, oq->buffer_size) > MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
> + octep_oq_drop_rx(oq, buff_info, &read_idx, &desc_used);
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
The AI-generated review of this patch on sashiko.dev flags that
this cannot occur for 4K pages. I believe this can be
addressed by changing the type of data_len to u32.
I also believe that a similar problem exists in patch 3/3.
"Does truncating the data_len calculation to u16 introduce a regression
by bypassing the MAX_SKB_FRAGS check?
If buff_info->len is unexpectedly large, the u16 truncation of data_len
could wrap around to a small value. This would bypass the check,
leaving unconsumed fragments in the ring that might be incorrectly
parsed as new packet headers."
> +
> skb = build_skb((void *)resp_hw, PAGE_SIZE);
> if (!skb) {
> octep_oq_drop_rx(oq, buff_info,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 15:02 [PATCH net v4 0/3] octeon_ep, octeon_ep_vf: fix RX skb frags overflow and page leak Maoyi Xie
2026-07-06 15:02 ` [PATCH net v4 1/3] octeon_ep: fix skb frags overflow in the RX path Maoyi Xie
2026-07-13 11:06 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-07-06 15:02 ` [PATCH net v4 2/3] octeon_ep_vf: Fix RX page leak on napi_build_skb() failure Maoyi Xie
2026-07-06 16:10 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-07-06 15:02 ` [PATCH net v4 3/3] octeon_ep_vf: fix skb frags overflow in the RX path Maoyi Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260713110606.GD1364329@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sburla@marvell.com \
--cc=sedara@marvell.com \
--cc=srasheed@marvell.com \
--cc=vburru@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.