From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/17] bpf: Report Policy helper and kfunc errors
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:39:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713153910.2556007-15-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713153910.2556007-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Augment selected helper and kfunc allowability failures with Policy reports.
These reports explain which requested operation is forbidden and why, without
adding path history for non-path-dependent policy checks.
Cover unprivileged bpf2bpf and kfunc use, helper program-type restrictions,
GPL-only helpers, helper-specific allow callbacks, kfunc allowability, and
destructive kfunc capability checks.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h | 2 ++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
index 5496e7a0235b..8bf5aef0315b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.c
@@ -1296,6 +1296,19 @@ void bpf_diag_report_program_structure(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_id
diag_report_suggestion(env, "%s", suggestion);
}
+
+void bpf_diag_report_policy(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *operation,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion)
+{
+ bpf_diag_report_header(env, CATEGORY_POLICY, "operation is not allowed");
+ diag_report_reason(env, "The operation %s is not allowed: %s.", operation, reason);
+
+ diag_report_section(env, "At");
+ bpf_diag_report_source(env, insn_idx, "error", "policy check failed for %s", operation);
+
+ diag_report_suggestion(env, "%s", suggestion);
+}
+
void bpf_diag_report_invalid_deref(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, int regno,
const char *reg_name, const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
enum bpf_diag_invalid_deref_kind kind, s64 offset)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h
index bb29f4235a68..64ab9de2bbf6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h
+++ b/kernel/bpf/diagnostics.h
@@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ void bpf_diag_ctx(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_diag_ctx_report report,
void bpf_diag_report_program_structure(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx,
const char *problem, const char *suggestion,
const char *reason_fmt, ...) __printf(5, 6);
+void bpf_diag_report_policy(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, const char *operation,
+ const char *reason, const char *suggestion);
int bpf_diag_record_branch(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx, bool cond_true);
void bpf_diag_record_mod(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_idx,
struct bpf_diag_mod_target target, enum bpf_diag_mod_reason reason,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 44e1907ac792..c67646f98134 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2963,6 +2963,12 @@ static int add_subprog_and_kfunc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (!env->bpf_capable) {
verbose(env, "loading/calling other bpf or kernel functions are allowed for CAP_BPF and CAP_SYS_ADMIN\n");
+ bpf_diag_report_policy(env, i, "bpf-to-bpf or kernel function call",
+ "loading or calling other BPF or kernel functions "
+ "requires CAP_BPF or CAP_SYS_ADMIN",
+ "Load this program with the required capability, or "
+ "avoid bpf-to-bpf and kernel function calls in "
+ "unprivileged programs.");
return -EPERM;
}
@@ -11030,17 +11036,35 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
if (err) {
verbose(env, "program of this type cannot use helper %s#%d\n",
func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
+ operation = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 1, "helper %s#%d", func_id_name(func_id),
+ func_id);
+ bpf_diag_report_policy(env, insn_idx, operation,
+ "this program type does not allow the helper",
+ "Use a helper allowed for this program type, or move the "
+ "logic to a compatible program type.");
return err;
}
/* eBPF programs must be GPL compatible to use GPL-ed functions */
if (!env->prog->gpl_compatible && fn->gpl_only) {
verbose(env, "cannot call GPL-restricted function from non-GPL compatible program\n");
+ operation = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 1, "helper %s#%d", func_id_name(func_id),
+ func_id);
+ bpf_diag_report_policy(env, insn_idx, operation,
+ "this helper is restricted to GPL-compatible programs",
+ "Use a GPL-compatible license, or replace the helper with "
+ "one that is available to non-GPL programs.");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (fn->allowed && !fn->allowed(env->prog)) {
verbose(env, "helper call is not allowed in probe\n");
+ operation = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 1, "helper %s#%d", func_id_name(func_id),
+ func_id);
+ bpf_diag_report_policy(env, insn_idx, operation,
+ "the helper-specific policy callback rejected this program",
+ "Use the helper only from an allowed attach point or "
+ "program configuration.");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -13961,8 +13985,14 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
return 0;
err = bpf_fetch_kfunc_arg_meta(env, insn->imm, insn->off, &meta);
- if (err == -EACCES && meta.func_name)
+ if (err == -EACCES && meta.func_name) {
verbose(env, "calling kernel function %s is not allowed\n", meta.func_name);
+ operation = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 1, "kfunc %s", meta.func_name);
+ bpf_diag_report_policy(env, insn_idx, operation,
+ "this program cannot call the kfunc",
+ "Use a kfunc allowed for this program type and attach "
+ "point, or change the program context.");
+ }
if (err)
return err;
desc_btf = meta.btf;
@@ -14003,6 +14033,11 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
if (is_kfunc_destructive(&meta) && !capable(CAP_SYS_BOOT)) {
verbose(env, "destructive kfunc calls require CAP_SYS_BOOT capability\n");
+ operation = bpf_diag_scratch_printf(env, 1, "destructive kfunc %s", meta.func_name);
+ bpf_diag_report_policy(env, insn_idx, operation,
+ "destructive kfuncs require CAP_SYS_BOOT",
+ "Load the program with CAP_SYS_BOOT, or avoid destructive "
+ "kfuncs.");
return -EACCES;
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 15:38 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/17] Redesign Verification Errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostics report helpers Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/17] bpf: Add source and instruction diagnostic context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/17] bpf: Add verifier diagnostic event log Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/17] bpf: Prune verifier diagnostics when switching paths Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/17] bpf: Track verifier register diagnostic events Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/17] bpf: Track verifier reference " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/17] bpf: Track verifier context " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/17] bpf: Report Register Type Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/17] bpf: Report Memory Safety bounds errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/17] bpf: Report Resource Lifetime reference leaks Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/17] bpf: Report Call Type Safety argument errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/17] bpf: Report Execution Context Safety errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/17] bpf: Report Program Structure CFG errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-07-13 16:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/17] bpf: Report Policy helper and kfunc errors sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/17] bpf: Report Verifier Limit errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/17] bpf: Report Verifier Internal errors Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-13 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/17] bpf: Gate verifier diagnostics on log level Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-07-14 3:36 ` kernel test robot
2026-07-14 6:10 ` [syzbot ci] Re: Redesign Verification Errors syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260713153910.2556007-15-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.