All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ankur Arora" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait()
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 07:44:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714074406.95EDF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714073041.40250-6-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Removing the ARM64-specific `smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait()` fallback before replacing it with a working alternative breaks BPF `rqspinlock` timeout functionality, causing indefinite hangs on platforms without a timer event stream.
--

--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v14 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() ---
commit e150f6dc634a9b6af6666a67d9bc5ea262bedad7
Author: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait()

This commit removes the private definition of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait()
and its helper macros from arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h. The commit
message notes this is in preparation for defining
smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout(), allowing rqspinlock to fall back to using
smp_cond_load_acquire() in the interim.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
> index 9ea0a74e58927..a385603436e98 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
[ ... ]
> -#define smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait(ptr, cond_expr,			\
> -				      time_expr_ns, time_limit_ns)	\
> -({									\
> -	__unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) _val;				\
> -	int __wfe = arch_timer_evtstrm_available();			\
> -									\
> -	if (likely(__wfe)) {						\
> -		_val = __smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait(ptr, cond_expr,	\
> -							time_expr_ns,	\
> -							time_limit_ns);	\
> -	} else {							\
> -		_val = __smp_cond_load_relaxed_spinwait(ptr, cond_expr,	\
> -							time_expr_ns,	\
> -							time_limit_ns);	\
> -		smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();				\
> -	}								\
> -	(typeof(*ptr))_val;						\
> -})
> -
> -#endif
> -
> -#define res_smp_cond_load_acquire(v, c) smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait(v, c, 0, 1)

[Severity: High]
With this custom fallback removed, the BPF rqspinlock code will use the generic
smp_cond_load_acquire(). Does this mean on platforms without a timer event
stream (arch_timer_evtstrm_available() is false), a CPU could get permanently
stuck in a WFE instruction during a lock timeout?

In kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c:resilient_queued_spin_lock_slowpath(), the timeout is
evaluated as part of the condition expression:

    res_smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->locked, !VAL || RES_CHECK_TIMEOUT(ts, ret, _Q_LOCKED_MASK));

But smp_cond_load_acquire() calls __cmpwait_relaxed() which executes WFE:

    __cmpwait_relaxed(__PTR, VAL);

If no stores occur to the locked byte, WFE will wait indefinitely, and the
embedded timeout check won't be evaluated while the CPU is asleep.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260714073041.40250-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-14  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-14  7:30 [PATCH v14 00/15] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 01/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 02/15] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 03/15] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 04/15] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 05/15] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:44   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 06/15] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 07/15] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 08/15] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 09/15] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 10/15] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 11/15] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 12/15] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 13/15] arm64/delay: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 14/15] barrier: add tests for smp_cond_load_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  7:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  8:11   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-14  7:30 ` [PATCH v14 15/15] barrier: add clock tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-07-14  8:03   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260714074406.95EDF1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.