From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F3D40EBA9 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784129093; cv=none; b=No6nWKyzggbE7mhazCnGu8KZBGh6esDC0C/m7HYSQDES8Zu/KrrDA6raBycTle9b8WPs4gagp3iOAbWH9jzt1y3zO0vHXLAZl9XECGIxHSiFdyYIeYneLhAPDgCBGXi7XrBJAFryaOunNCwfQg9CZh8KpxLHbo45UE6j12q79Ec= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784129093; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3E46ftJWMapUz5i4J+PjidiOxIRQA+ZAeSkshbyXWEw=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=bjMjqfTaR67A2/eQys6GnTlVTdTGynoF5seuYYEuHDG0LzfBVkJ4iEEXkGSH47LDiRF+wzBo4ciSKbStc+MIwMnM9MwMmSIQDTIbSsL2Egrx9MD2vguV6gOjZY4g88vvnYoX/KD92mnTA46VvKNlNkff4bUzbPT+94rHm59TT/U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RRU23EXR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RRU23EXR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F7B61F000E9; Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784129092; bh=3E46ftJWMapUz5i4J+PjidiOxIRQA+ZAeSkshbyXWEw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=RRU23EXRlq738Q4nB/BXA+8Um2Ke5SOn0eCOwp8q9n5AUYgybk3/HmlkEm+1/W+9K sl0aouxBJap9VkZ1SXpPkJKnKoCTEkPXKKOMp6QFbe8mHPTnO3g53UGUa2DvwvNzOL nDAVE3wCpNf/iEVvZwn/8RPbYDTD++WLQg7suDGl4MBksyqKd6/tItMuSdzDHbNVxs MYAxN2i7Hy1YjEl6I++zAxtf+IDaUr+UYeNa9OFrlqmXE1xG1UfQcLrQanoqtqCQ/W 3miZdfGRt68SLa/OCnzKhd+2zD4tP398pMoUS1fL7fUFslNMEf4ASis7q/6xAFSXSx xOzxDtFqfk9aA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: PCI: Use a mutex guard to simplify acpi_get_pci_dev() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <2417350.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <5115219.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki> <2417350.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:24:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20260715152452.4F7B61F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >=20 > Use a mutex guard in acpi_get_pci_dev() for the physical_node_lock > locking and drop local variable pci_dev that becomes redundant after > that change. >=20 > No intentional functional impact. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/5115219.31r3eYUQgx@= rafael.j.wysocki?part=3D1