From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED4A37E5C7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 07:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784185448; cv=none; b=E7j1SxHfp6ZE9p1uVnSr6r0EwK6ZO1O+71ycchypsClPXXYSrjvXrsFn7zgLeGkW9HzfL/xgUQu6aVieTWB0Muqdcvhz94Xo0i7Tc8WABzaX9MTpZ8fmJxKt7ekY2KkJlrljCSrXSMPOwQ+xJmPRBVXLpJrICVpxJl3u4MGGvos= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784185448; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZqtGDSG2+sSkJRL7t2TMVuSvNKeGhndKzz9B/tTbPqU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=foVlPuMXXxCcnB/d40N4l78dqe4af6w46r3sh7afW62GnFxKQhnGMrERm91j+nV3ra4zSs/z92j61oZ+rdSg8+ZBJg3gy0suISRo/jdF0i1C+2jQx8sHT6PhB3az1yxnXlZUyoiYPtQRlMlRywWyio5Wai5mvCcOMKWnR9/ArJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iGuK8Pol; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iGuK8Pol" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F8951F000E9; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 07:04:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784185447; bh=npvfM50PMHcMkc39uTq87aDM5NyX/ukEn9mcXUjGrPY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iGuK8Pol1ENHcX0cfLrYkPi76hXibDHEukqISohXALGXlgcBu39RYes19sYyMJATD d8Od0OPEayBFccC27Zqb5pTTkKDNue4Ep6GfSwFSMCCfWede6sYWAnALRojVqL3TXo 6ASS6FGqlutmNeToeAvZ5c3uv30I80mLAGmQ5UR8iMckyO0I09SBVZJcl3It5sF04n 2lYVHfZ7d/6uXjfUna9I2vj2cArZxRDKX+U2lxrd+sIZmksT2Rk/cNcFF1fc0ZmpGt b/hj9FYHHOp5prFN2tONrC68r8hh6aMPiZ+ujLxyEgBWacAIqiNO3b11wPRsFOXCZs E/2Cjmk8IvFdw== Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:04:01 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: James Bottomley Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Jan Kara , Theodore Tso , Roman Gushchin , Derek Barbosa , Matthieu Baerts , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Jason Gunthorpe , Steven Rostedt , users@kernel.org, Linux Media Mailing List , Stephen Finucane Subject: Re: Linking Patchwork with Sashiko? Message-ID: <20260716090401.193720d2@foz.lan> In-Reply-To: <7b8e735092ecd25c61e79d8291b2edf5e54dfb15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20260710083845.23c753ca@foz.lan> <87wlv2jq4t.fsf@linux.dev> <20260713095538.3d5e86f1@foz.lan> <20260713094120.GD1127719@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260713220427.582b28bf@foz.lan> <7ia4mrvtrxjl.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <20260715005909.GF1656185@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260715161111.GC1778116@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260715202808.GN1778116@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <7b8e735092ecd25c61e79d8291b2edf5e54dfb15.camel@HansenPartnership.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:36:42 -0400 James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2026-07-15 at 23:28 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > [...] > > No later than yesterday a friend of mine pointed me to a mail thread > > where sashiko referenced code that has never existed in the kernel, > > and the maintainer blindly trusted the comment and asked the patch > > author to fix that issue, seemingly doubling down when told the code > > didn't exist. I saw the same more than once in the past where humans did about the same by assuming a previous implementation of some code. > We can definitely do maintainer education if you point me (or the TAB) > at the thread. Sashiko as a tool can absolutely get things wrong so, > as maintainers, we do need to accept a reasoned answer that shows the > review is wrong. As already pointed on this thread, the author is the one that has more time to dedicate to his proposed changes. A simply reply to a Sashiko's email telling that the referenced code there was an hallucination would be enough for maintainers to ignore such particular issue. Thanks, Mauro