From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:26:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716092610.B6A1B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716090726.2711293-2-lee@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Lockless access to sibling device pointers in wacom_mode_change_work() leads to concurrent double-free and Use-After-Free.
- [High] wacom_remove_shared_data() calls kref_put() outside of the list lock, creating a race condition that leads to refcount corruption and Use-After-Free.
- [High] The patch protects touch_input with RCU but fails to protect shared->pen and shared->touch, leaving a Use-After-Free vulnerability in IRQ paths.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v6 2/4] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad ---
commit db13f6a5a689d086da00c273947930e39aedbb61
Author: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad
This patch attempts to fix a TOCTOU Use-After-Free race condition by
introducing RCU protection for the touch_input pointer in the wacom_shared
struct, wrapping readers in RCU guards, updating writers, and calling
synchronize_rcu().
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> index 6c2a3ddfe366a..c6b37931d02d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> @@ -875,10 +875,16 @@ static void wacom_remove_shared_data(void *res)
> data = container_of(wacom_wac->shared, struct wacom_hdev_data,
> shared);
>
> - if (wacom_wac->shared->touch == wacom->hdev)
> - wacom_wac->shared->touch = NULL;
> - else if (wacom_wac->shared->pen == wacom->hdev)
> - wacom_wac->shared->pen = NULL;
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &wacom_udev_list_lock) {
> + if (wacom_wac->shared->touch == wacom->hdev) {
> + wacom_wac->shared->touch = NULL;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(wacom_wac->shared->touch_input, NULL);
> + } else if (wacom_wac->shared->pen == wacom->hdev) {
> + wacom_wac->shared->pen = NULL;
> + }
> + }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does shared->pen (and shared->touch) need
the same RCU protection that is being added here for touch_input?
For instance, in wacom_bamboo_pad_pen_event(), shared->pen is accessed
locklessly in an interrupt handler:
drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c:wacom_bamboo_pad_pen_event() {
...
hid_input_report(wacom->shared->pen, HID_INPUT_REPORT, data,
WACOM_PKGLEN_PENABLED, 1);
...
}
If the Pen sibling device is disconnected concurrently,
wacom_remove_shared_data() clears shared->pen here. Could a preempted or
concurrent IRQ read the non-NULL shared->pen pointer before it is cleared,
and pass the dangling pointer to hid_input_report() once the Pen device is
unbound and freed?
Additionally, in wacom_mode_change_work(), there is lockless access to
these sibling device pointers:
drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c:wacom_mode_change_work() {
...
wacom1 = hid_get_drvdata(shared->pen);
wacom_release_resources(wacom1);
hid_hw_stop(wacom1->hdev);
...
}
Could the asynchronous worker on a Touch device read shared->pen concurrently
with the Pen device being unbound, leading to a concurrent double-free or
Use-After-Free of the device memory?
> +
> + synchronize_rcu();
>
> kref_put(&data->kref, wacom_release_shared_data);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but since kref_put() is called
here outside of the wacom_udev_list_lock, can this create a race condition
that leads to refcount corruption?
If the refcount drops to 0, it calls the release function which waits for
the lock to remove the object from wacom_udev_list. Concurrently, couldn't a
probe on another device acquire the lock and iterate the list:
drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c:wacom_get_hdev_data() {
...
kref_get(&data->kref);
return data;
...
}
Could this result in incrementing a 0-refcount object, causing a
Use-After-Free when the original thread proceeds to unlink and free the
structure?
> wacom_wac->shared = NULL;
> }
> }
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260716090726.2711293-1-lee@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 9:07 [PATCH v6 1/4] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration Lee Jones
2026-07-16 9:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad Lee Jones
2026-07-16 9:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-16 9:07 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad Lee Jones
2026-07-16 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 9:07 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle Lee Jones
2026-07-16 9:17 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716092610.B6A1B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.