From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 564503F822B for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784210932; cv=none; b=UTEnbia6NuMF615fJcNP2TFQOKt+LknBu9mvatL/pNfWDIc22p3Aw1jtQSOW14oq9UtyT+nfS8HCfKzLMJnVFVW3SfDigyNC7W5rrENvqXaYLybqF02NbNGm6XPSnmADMcvMohq0GRSzmNX7pq/383foIrl950tWqoiP5syauWk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784210932; c=relaxed/simple; bh=48X8sVZ47LFFwU3pbsqfxxompYl0yRhnFoGDPJ9/sQ0=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=fVjB559Cz0IwBZKa7cW3mOvMxikOUGkKEWu6cS8N4SHfI3/hQF4W5Jy/Ngh1kg66LQ2j1ING0i6xg5GTHjZs5CGAMDHQFgdXrd3NvZp7ojS6Wvg2iBfFWlqT+fVICCc0ntdnsKyjpe0CySIo7W1Pa49oy2jHLduZa6+Gro/SSrY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YRwZ1XgM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YRwZ1XgM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 048E11F00A3E; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:08:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784210931; bh=48X8sVZ47LFFwU3pbsqfxxompYl0yRhnFoGDPJ9/sQ0=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=YRwZ1XgM69LDQ1Yjqjjp4d4AGYvN22rD2MTSR8eDXzVmXSkj3MkMq8euEtzIMMd8P g6uXqw87Vh1qOYrWjQTUIC42gQ8jw8yJU4mimZHnRthtgFYTkfDDgoh45Tb0K/sKwd ATWYPX2LS3373dE8jz8jCaYOkyvClkk2v3UsCFYqG27xpvgOIzZN9l5X35mGdrUSA/ Ely6Obpb+4VzhsB8Yo20RfZtWBn8rJTqVlEifQTLrDZIJwuleFvElzpZiRXO36Zqrk VxqSWXH1+4S4Oj/GVGHWWjtu+kI7HvFKyWV9vw06+RKbjVmL7gJfRb8jUWtC85BRno Ciiio4epthq4Q== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ACPI: PCI: Use a mutex guard to simplify acpi_get_pci_dev() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3056272.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki> References: <12935400.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki> <3056272.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:08:50 +0000 Message-Id: <20260716140851.048E11F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >=20 > Use a mutex guard in acpi_get_pci_dev() for the physical_node_lock > locking and drop local variable pci_dev that becomes redundant after > that change. >=20 > No intentional functional impact. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/12935400.O9o76ZdvQC= @rafael.j.wysocki?part=3D1