All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	<linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [xfs]  9b64ca202f: fxmark.ssd_xfs_DRBH_4_bufferedio.works/sec 24.1% regression
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:13:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202607161601.867c143e-lkp@intel.com> (raw)



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed a 24.1% regression of fxmark.ssd_xfs_DRBH_4_bufferedio.works/sec on:


commit: 9b64ca202f364a6bf8e19bdd20953bc2d776c67f ("xfs: store an agbno in struct xfs_imap")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

[still regression on linus/master      a635d6748234582ea287c5ffeae28b9b23f91c7e]
[still regression on linux-next/master bee763d5f341b99cf472afeb508d4988f62a6ca1]

testcase: fxmark
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 64 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6346 CPU @ 3.10GHz (Ice Lake) with 256G memory
parameters:

	disk: 1SSD
	media: ssd
	test: DRBH
	fstype: xfs
	directio: bufferedio
	thread_nr: 4
	cpufreq_governor: performance




If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202607161601.867c143e-lkp@intel.com


Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->


The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260716/202607161601.867c143e-lkp@intel.com

=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/directio/disk/fstype/kconfig/media/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/thread_nr:
  gcc-14/performance/bufferedio/1SSD/xfs/x86_64-rhel-9.4/ssd/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-icl-2sp8/DRBH/fxmark/4

commit: 
  caffb4252c ("xfs: massage xfs_imap_to_bp into xfs_read_icluster")
  9b64ca202f ("xfs: store an agbno in struct xfs_imap")

caffb4252cf15c5c 9b64ca202f364a6bf8e19bdd209 
---------------- --------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
     23.90 ±  3%     -12.6%      20.88 ±  3%  fxmark.ssd_xfs_DRBH_4_bufferedio.user_sec
     12.24 ±  3%     -12.9%      10.67 ±  4%  fxmark.ssd_xfs_DRBH_4_bufferedio.user_util
 3.662e+08 ±  4%     -24.1%   2.78e+08 ±  4%  fxmark.ssd_xfs_DRBH_4_bufferedio.works
   7324905 ±  4%     -24.1%    5559335 ±  4%  fxmark.ssd_xfs_DRBH_4_bufferedio.works/sec
     76773 ±  5%     +13.3%      87019 ± 10%  cpuidle..usage
     10.88 ±  3%     -12.1%       9.56 ±  6%  iostat.cpu.user
     11.27 ±  3%      -1.3        9.96 ±  6%  mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
      2332 ±  2%      +6.5%       2483 ±  6%  vmstat.system.cs
      1.34 ± 49%    +112.1%       2.85 ± 31%  perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.perf_trace_sched_switch.preempt_schedule_irq.irqentry_exit.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.current_time
      1.89 ± 46%    +763.1%      16.29 ± 43%  perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.perf_trace_sched_switch.preempt_schedule_irq.irqentry_exit.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.current_time
     66.33 ± 17%     +69.8%     112.67 ± 28%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.perf_trace_sched_switch.preempt_schedule_thunk.filemap_get_read_batch.filemap_get_pages.filemap_read
      1.34 ± 49%    +112.1%       2.85 ± 31%  perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.perf_trace_sched_switch.preempt_schedule_irq.irqentry_exit.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.current_time
      1.89 ± 46%    +763.1%      16.29 ± 43%  perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.perf_trace_sched_switch.preempt_schedule_irq.irqentry_exit.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.current_time
      5.58 ±104%      -4.4        1.19 ±223%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.pv_native_safe_halt.acpi_safe_halt.acpi_idle_do_entry.acpi_idle_enter.cpuidle_enter_state
      4.45 ±117%      -3.3        1.11 ±223%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.lru_gen_del_folio.__page_cache_release.folios_put_refs.free_pages_and_swap_cache.__tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages
      3.26 ±101%      -3.3        0.00        perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__page_cache_release.folios_put_refs.free_pages_and_swap_cache.__tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages.tlb_flush_mmu
      4.30 ± 72%      -2.8        1.52 ±223%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.mutex_unlock.sw_perf_event_destroy.__free_event.perf_event_release_kernel.perf_release
      4.15 ± 74%      -2.3        1.87 ±145%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tear_down_vmas.exit_mmap.__mmput.exit_mm.do_exit
      4.14 ±103%      -1.6        2.58 ±160%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__dentry_kill.finish_dput.__fput.task_work_run.do_exit
      4.14 ±103%      -1.6        2.58 ±160%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.finish_dput.__fput.task_work_run.do_exit.do_group_exit
      3.11 ±101%      -1.1        2.04 ±148%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.free_unref_folios.folios_put_refs.free_pages_and_swap_cache.__tlb_batch_free_encoded_pages.tlb_finish_mmu
      3.26 ±101%      -0.7        2.58 ±160%  perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.kmem_cache_free.__dentry_kill.finish_dput.__fput.task_work_run
      4.45 ±117%      -3.3        1.11 ±223%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lru_gen_del_folio
      4.45 ±117%      -2.6        1.84 ±146%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__page_cache_release
      4.15 ± 74%      -2.3        1.87 ±145%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tear_down_vmas
      4.30 ± 72%      -1.5        2.80 ±142%  perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.mutex_unlock
      4.30 ± 72%      -1.5        2.80 ±142%  perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.mutex_unlock




Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202607161601.867c143e-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.