From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pan Chuang" <panchuang@vivo.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: host: Remove redundant dev_err()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 04:03:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717040305.C3B091F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717035013.563791-1-panchuang@vivo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Teardown order violation in ufs_qcom_remove() destroys the MSI domain before devres-managed IRQs are freed, leading to a potential Use-After-Free or panic.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] ufs: host: Remove redundant dev_err() ---
commit 2d60d33ee1768b4175522f72c450271bc5ddc6ae
Author: Pan Chuang <panchuang@vivo.com>
ufs: host: Remove redundant dev_err()
Since commit 55b48e23f5c4 ("genirq/devres: Add error handling in
devm_request_*_irq()"), devm_request_irq() automatically logs
detailed error messages on failure. Remove the now-redundant
driver-specific dev_err() calls.
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 291c434487648..7d690ea2fa674 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -2431,8 +2431,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_config_esi(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> ret = devm_request_irq(hba->dev, qi[idx].irq, ufs_qcom_mcq_esi_handler,
> IRQF_SHARED, "qcom-mcq-esi", qi + idx);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to request IRQ for %d, err = %d\n",
> - __func__, qi[idx].irq, ret);
> /* Free previously allocated IRQs */
> for (int j = 0; j < idx; j++)
> devm_free_irq(hba->dev, qi[j].irq, qi + j);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since devres-managed IRQs are used here,
does ufs_qcom_remove() break teardown symmetry?
In ufs_qcom_remove(), the MSI domain is destroyed manually before
devres-managed IRQ handlers are released:
drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c:ufs_qcom_remove() {
...
ufshcd_pltfrm_remove(pdev);
if (host->esi_enabled)
platform_device_msi_free_irqs_all(hba->dev);
...
}
When the device is unbound, platform_device_msi_free_irqs_all() destroys the
MSI IRQ domain and descriptors before devres runs.
When devm_irq_release() later calls free_irq(), it silently returns early
because the descriptor is already gone. This bypasses the critical
__synchronize_irq() and kthread_stop() cleanup logic.
Could this permanently leak the threaded IRQ handlers (struct irqaction
objects) and cause a use-after-free or kernel panic if a handler is
scheduled or running while the driver memory is freed?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717035013.563791-1-panchuang@vivo.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 3:50 [PATCH] ufs: host: Remove redundant dev_err() Pan Chuang
2026-07-17 4:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 6:35 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-07-17 17:24 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717040305.C3B091F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=panchuang@vivo.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.