From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Even Xu" <even.xu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 04:08:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717040821.2D2AA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717035609.3874015-4-even.xu@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Race condition during device teardown allows the IRQ thread handler to unconditionally schedule `recover_work` after `cancel_work_sync()` has completed, leading to a Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback ---
commit 476846b5d6215f9a1a461a86f427618ddd19b6d1
Author: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback
This patch updates the recovery flow to execute in a workqueue rather than
directly in the IRQ handler. It introduces a recover_work item and a
recovery_disabled flag to manage the teardown process.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c
> index 4ae2e1718b30c..db7ede5cc7a29 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-thc-hid/intel-quickspi/pci-quickspi.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -337,11 +334,10 @@ static irqreturn_t quickspi_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> }
>
> end:
> if (err_recover)
> - if (try_recover(qsdev))
> - qsdev->state = QUICKSPI_DISABLED;
> + schedule_work(&qsdev->recover_work);
[Severity: High]
Can this schedule the work after it has been cancelled during device teardown?
Since the threaded IRQ handler doesn't check the recovery_disabled flag
before calling schedule_work(), if quickspi_irq_thread_handler() runs
concurrently with quickspi_dev_deinit():
CPU 1
quickspi_dev_deinit()
WRITE_ONCE(qsdev->recovery_disabled, true);
cancel_work_sync(&qsdev->recover_work);
// returns, and eventually devres frees qsdev
CPU 2
quickspi_irq_thread_handler()
...
if (err_recover)
schedule_work(&qsdev->recover_work);
Could CPU 2 queue the work after CPU 1 finishes cancel_work_sync()?
If the scheduled work executes after qsdev has been freed, will this cause a
use-after-free when try_recover() reads qsdev->recovery_disabled?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717035609.3874015-1-even.xu@intel.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 3:56 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Refine error recovery flow Even Xu
2026-07-17 3:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-thc: Add API to reset read DMA Even Xu
2026-07-17 4:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 3:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quicki2c: Refine recover callback Even Xu
2026-07-17 4:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 3:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: " Even Xu
2026-07-17 4:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17 3:37 [PATCH v4 0/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Refine error recovery flow Even Xu
2026-07-17 3:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Refine recover callback Even Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717040821.2D2AA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=even.xu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.