All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jinchao Wang" <wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] HWBP: Add modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local() API
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:21:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717132104.DDBB91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717130340.1902076-1-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Non-atomic updates to active hardware breakpoint state can cause torn reads in NMI/#DB handlers.
- [High] The function alters the event's internal software state before verifying if the hardware update succeeds, leaving the state permanently corrupted if the hardware update fails.
--

--- Patch [4]: [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] HWBP: Add modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local() API ---
commit 326c7d6d8fc03bc42d6719968b050227e4e25f31
Author: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

HWBP: Add modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local() API

This commit adds modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local(), an arch-wide interface
allowing hardware breakpoint users to update watch addresses on-line for the
local CPU. It updates the configuration by reusing the current hardware slot
without releasing and reserving it.

> diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 789add0c185a0..f4709c892d674 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c

[ ... ]

> +int modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local(struct perf_event *bp,
> +				    struct perf_event_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	struct arch_hw_breakpoint info;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (find_slot_idx(bp->attr.bp_type) != find_slot_idx(attr->bp_type))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(bp, attr, &info);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*counter_arch_bp(bp) = info;
> +	bp->attr.bp_addr = attr->bp_addr;
> +	bp->attr.bp_type = attr->bp_type;
> +	bp->attr.bp_len = attr->bp_len;

[Severity: High]
Can this cause a torn read if an NMI/#DB exception occurs while we are
non-atomically updating the breakpoint state?

If an NMI triggers a #DB exception before arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint()
completes, the hw_breakpoint_handler might read the partially updated
bp->hw.info and bp->attr while the hardware DR7 register is still armed with
the old configuration.

On architectures like x86, reading a torn bp->hw.info.type might cause the
handler to misidentify the breakpoint type and fail to set the RF flag,
leading to an infinite #DB loop.

> +
> +	return arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint(bp);

[Severity: High]
Does this leave the software state permanently corrupted if the hardware
update fails?

If the PMU rotates the event out just before this function is called,
arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint() might fail and return an error like -EINVAL.
This error is propagated to the caller, so the caller assumes the
modification failed.

However, the software state (bp->attr and bp->hw.info) was already
overwritten above and is not rolled back. When the PMU later rotates the
breakpoint back in, will it silently use this uncommitted new configuration?

> +}
> +#else
> +int modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local(struct perf_event *bp,
> +				    struct perf_event_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +#endif
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717125023.1895892-1-wangjinchao600@gmail.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 12:50 [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] mm/kwatch: dynamic hardware watchpoints for hunting memory corruption Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/13] arch: add HAVE_REINSTALL_HW_BREAKPOINT Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] x86/hw_breakpoint: Unify breakpoint install/uninstall Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] x86/hw_breakpoint: Add arch_reinstall_hw_breakpoint Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:03 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] HWBP: Add modify_wide_hw_breakpoint_local() API Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:21   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/13] mm/kwatch: add watch expression parser and dereference engine Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/13] mm/kwatch: add lockless per-task context pool Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/13] stacktrace: export stack_trace_save_regs() Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] mm/kwatch: add hardware breakpoint backend Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/13] mm/kwatch: add probe lifecycle runtime Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/13] mm/kwatch: add anchor thread for global watchpoints Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/13] mm/kwatch: add debugfs control plane Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] mm/kwatch: add KUnit tests for the watch expression parser Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/13] Documentation/dev-tools: document KWatch Jinchao Wang
2026-07-17 13:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 13:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] mm/kwatch: dynamic hardware watchpoints for hunting memory corruption Dave Hansen
2026-07-17 18:10   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717132104.DDBB91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wangjinchao600@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.