From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, kasong@tencent.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, axelrasmussen@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, chrisl@kernel.org,
nphamcs@gmail.com, baoquan.he@linux.dev, youngjun.park@lge.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/vmscan: reduce lru_lock contention via vmstat-derived scan-balance cost
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 06:57:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717135807.3476029-3-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717135807.3476029-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
The anon/file scan balance in get_scan_count() is driven by two scalars
in struct lruvec, anon_cost and file_cost, accumulated by every reclaim
producer under lruvec->lru_lock. The acquisition sites for cost work
specifically are:
- shrink_inactive_list() re-takes lru_lock at function exit purely
to call lru_note_cost_unlock_irq() with (nr_pageout, nr_scanned -
nr_reclaimed). One acquisition per inactive shrink.
- shrink_active_list() does the same with (0, nr_rotated). One
acquisition per active shrink.
- workingset_refault() takes the lock via folio_lruvec_lock_irq()
purely to record the refault cost. One acquisition per refault.
- prepare_scan_control() takes lru_lock just to snapshot the two
scalars into sc->{anon,file}_cost.
- lru_note_cost_unlock_irq() itself walks parent_lruvec and
re-acquires lru_lock on each ancestor to propagate the update,
adding O(memcg-depth) acquisitions per producer call.
This hurts because lru_lock is already a heavy contention point on
memory-heavy workloads: every isolate_lru_folios(), move_folios_to_lru()
and folio_add_lru() takes it. The cost work itself is trivial (two
scalar bumps and one comparison), but it contends with and causes
contention for actual LRU manipulation. The parent_lruvec() walk also
multiplies cost-update overhead by memcg hierarchy depth.
Replace the producer-side accumulators with a read-side accumulator fed
from per-LRU vmstat counters. The old producer formula was:
cost = nr_io * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX + nr_rotated
Reuse NR_VMSCAN_WRITE for reclaim-driven anon pageout submissions. It is
already bumped by writeout() for the same successful outcome that fed
reclaim_stat.nr_pageout. Reclaim does not submit filesystem folios from
this path, so there is no file pageout term. Charge NR_VMSCAN_WRITE via
lruvec_stat_mod_folio() and include it in memcg_node_stat_items so it can
be sampled per lruvec and aggregated through the memcg hierarchy.
Add explicit PGROTATE_{ANON,FILE} node_stat counters for the remaining
producer-local input. They are bumped from shrink_inactive_list() by
nr_scanned - nr_reclaimed and from shrink_active_list() by nr_rotated.
WORKINGSET_RESTORE_{ANON,FILE} already captures the refault IO that
lru_note_cost_refault() used to bill.
In prepare_scan_control() the raw cost signals are recomputed without
lru_lock as:
anon = PGROTATE_ANON +
(NR_VMSCAN_WRITE + WORKINGSET_RESTORE_ANON) * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
file = PGROTATE_FILE +
WORKINGSET_RESTORE_FILE * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
The delta against a per-lruvec prev_cost[] snapshot is folded into
cost_accum[]. Since one vmstat delta can cover many producer events
between reclaim passes, halve cost_accum[] until the total is back
within the lrusize/4 bound instead of halving only once.
Moving accumulation and decay to the reclaim side also improves the cost
model across reclaim gaps. With producer-side decay, events that happen
while reclaim is idle still age each other before reclaim ever samples
the costs. If a workload refaults a large anon set and then a smaller
file set before reclaim runs again, the later file activity can age the
earlier anon activity out of the cost model. The new scheme observes the
whole between-reclaim delta and decays anon and file proportionally, so
the scan-balance history better represents what happened since the last
reclaim pass.
A dedicated per-lruvec spinlock, cost_lock, serialises the prev_cost RMW,
the accumulator update, and the halving check against concurrent
reclaimers in the same memcg+node.
Hierarchy aggregation is now implicit in the vmstat accounting. The
producer-side parent_lruvec() walk and lru_reparent_memcg() cost splice
existed only because anon_cost/file_cost were private lruvec fields. With
the cost expressed as lruvec vmstats, rstat propagates the underlying
counters through the memcg hierarchy and prepare_scan_control() consumes
the same ratelimited rstat view as the surrounding reclaim heuristics.
NR_VMSCAN_WRITE is accounted at writeout(), so reclaim_stat.nr_pageout is
no longer needed and is removed.
memcg-v1's memory.stat anon_cost/file_cost is now sourced from
cost_accum[] instead of the removed lruvec anon_cost/file_cost fields.
The reported values only refresh when prepare_scan_control() runs and
are bounded at ~lrusize/4 by the halving loop; the scan-balance signal
they express is unchanged.
Under pure MGLRU the scan-balance signal itself is not consumed (both
prepare_scan_control() and get_scan_count() are short-circuited on the
MGLRU paths, and MGLRU's own type/tier selection comes from read_ctrl_pos()
on lrugen->{avg_refaulted,avg_total,refaulted,evicted}, not from
anon_cost/file_cost). NR_VMSCAN_WRITE naturally covers writeout from
either reclaim implementation, and PGROTATE_{ANON,FILE} are bumped from
evict_folios() so per-memcg observability of rotation-driven reclaim work
stays consistent across both implementations.
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 ++++-
include/linux/swap.h | 3 --
include/linux/vmstat.h | 1 -
mm/memcontrol-v1.c | 4 +-
mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++-
mm/mmzone.c | 1 +
mm/swap.c | 69 ----------------------------------
mm/vmscan.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
mm/vmstat.c | 2 +
mm/workingset.c | 5 ---
10 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index ca2712187147..3ac467959e34 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ enum node_stat_item {
PGSCAN_PROACTIVE,
PGSCAN_ANON,
PGSCAN_FILE,
+ PGROTATE_ANON,
+ PGROTATE_FILE,
PGREFILL,
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
NR_HUGETLB,
@@ -763,9 +765,13 @@ struct lruvec {
* These track the cost of reclaiming one LRU - file or anon -
* over the other. As the observed cost of reclaiming one LRU
* increases, the reclaim scan balance tips toward the other.
+ * Updated and decayed at prepare_scan_control() time; cost_lock
+ * serialises that update.
*/
- unsigned long anon_cost;
- unsigned long file_cost;
+ unsigned long prev_cost[ANON_AND_FILE];
+ unsigned long cost_accum[ANON_AND_FILE];
+ /* Protects prev_cost and cost_accum. */
+ spinlock_t cost_lock;
/* Non-resident age, driven by LRU movement */
atomic_long_t nonresident_age;
/* Refaults at the time of last reclaim cycle */
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 6d72778e6cc3..d35a4761ebd7 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -309,9 +309,6 @@ extern unsigned long totalreserve_pages;
/* linux/mm/swap.c */
-void lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
- unsigned int nr_io, unsigned int nr_rotated);
-void lru_note_cost_refault(struct folio *);
void folio_add_lru(struct folio *);
void folio_add_lru_vma(struct folio *, struct vm_area_struct *);
void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h
index fb8c76289e02..5b31d8e7ae40 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmstat.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ struct reclaim_stat {
unsigned nr_congested;
unsigned nr_writeback;
unsigned nr_immediate;
- unsigned nr_pageout;
unsigned nr_activate[ANON_AND_FILE];
unsigned nr_ref_keep;
unsigned nr_unmap_fail;
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
index 765069211567..c7a52bb68f4c 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol-v1.c
@@ -1988,8 +1988,8 @@ void memcg1_stat_format(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct seq_buf *s)
for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
mz = memcg->nodeinfo[pgdat->node_id];
- anon_cost += mz->lruvec.anon_cost;
- file_cost += mz->lruvec.file_cost;
+ anon_cost += mz->lruvec.cost_accum[WORKINGSET_ANON];
+ file_cost += mz->lruvec.cost_accum[WORKINGSET_FILE];
}
seq_buf_printf(s, "anon_cost %lu\n", anon_cost);
seq_buf_printf(s, "file_cost %lu\n", file_cost);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index b4a357c5f7e0..8693aad26ca2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ static const unsigned int memcg_node_stat_items[] = {
NR_SHMEM_THPS,
NR_FILE_THPS,
NR_ANON_THPS,
+ NR_VMSCAN_WRITE,
NR_VMALLOC,
NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB,
NR_PAGETABLE,
@@ -419,6 +420,8 @@ static const unsigned int memcg_node_stat_items[] = {
PGSCAN_PROACTIVE,
PGSCAN_ANON,
PGSCAN_FILE,
+ PGROTATE_ANON,
+ PGROTATE_FILE,
PGREFILL,
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
NR_HUGETLB,
@@ -518,7 +521,7 @@ unsigned long lruvec_page_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx)
* reading from per-CPU delta skew must present as zero.
*
* XXX: This helper (and its node/global peers) exists because we place
- * monotonically-incremented event counters (PGROTATE_*, PGRECLAIM_PAGEOUT_*)
+ * monotonically-incremented event counters (NR_VMSCAN_WRITE and PGROTATE_*)
* into enum node_stat_item.
*/
unsigned long lruvec_page_state_monotonic(struct lruvec *lruvec,
diff --git a/mm/mmzone.c b/mm/mmzone.c
index 0c8f181d9d50..17139db4d291 100644
--- a/mm/mmzone.c
+++ b/mm/mmzone.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void lruvec_init(struct lruvec *lruvec)
memset(lruvec, 0, sizeof(struct lruvec));
spin_lock_init(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&lruvec->cost_lock);
zswap_lruvec_state_init(lruvec);
for_each_lru(lru)
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index 588f50d8f1a8..74b281778cbc 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -272,73 +272,6 @@ void folio_rotate_reclaimable(struct folio *folio)
folio_batch_add_and_move(folio, lru_move_tail);
}
-void lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
- unsigned int nr_io, unsigned int nr_rotated)
- __releases(lruvec->lru_lock)
- __releases(rcu)
-{
- unsigned long cost;
-
- /*
- * Reflect the relative cost of incurring IO and spending CPU
- * time on rotations. This doesn't attempt to make a precise
- * comparison, it just says: if reloads are about comparable
- * between the LRU lists, or rotations are overwhelmingly
- * different between them, adjust scan balance for CPU work.
- */
- cost = nr_io * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX + nr_rotated;
- if (!cost) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return;
- }
-
- for (;;) {
- unsigned long lrusize;
-
- /* Record cost event */
- if (file)
- lruvec->file_cost += cost;
- else
- lruvec->anon_cost += cost;
-
- /*
- * Decay previous events
- *
- * Because workloads change over time (and to avoid
- * overflow) we keep these statistics as a floating
- * average, which ends up weighing recent refaults
- * more than old ones.
- */
- lrusize = lruvec_page_state(lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_ANON) +
- lruvec_page_state(lruvec, NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
- lruvec_page_state(lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) +
- lruvec_page_state(lruvec, NR_ACTIVE_FILE);
-
- if (lruvec->file_cost + lruvec->anon_cost > lrusize / 4) {
- lruvec->file_cost /= 2;
- lruvec->anon_cost /= 2;
- }
-
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
- lruvec = parent_lruvec(lruvec);
- if (!lruvec) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- break;
- }
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
- }
-}
-
-void lru_note_cost_refault(struct folio *folio)
-{
- struct lruvec *lruvec;
-
- lruvec = folio_lruvec_lock_irq(folio);
- lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(lruvec, folio_is_file_lru(folio),
- folio_nr_pages(folio), 0);
-}
-
static void lru_activate(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio)
{
long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -1164,8 +1097,6 @@ void lru_reparent_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent, int
child_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, NODE_DATA(nid));
parent_lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(parent, NODE_DATA(nid));
- parent_lruvec->anon_cost += child_lruvec->anon_cost;
- parent_lruvec->file_cost += child_lruvec->file_cost;
for_each_lru(lru)
lruvec_reparent_lru(child_lruvec, parent_lruvec, lru, nid);
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index e8a90911bf88..515d913ed5dc 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static pageout_t writeout(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
trace_mm_vmscan_write_folio(folio);
- node_stat_add_folio(folio, NR_VMSCAN_WRITE);
+ lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_VMSCAN_WRITE, folio_nr_pages(folio));
return PAGE_SUCCESS;
}
@@ -1418,8 +1418,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list,
sc->nr_scanned -= (nr_pages - 1);
nr_pages = 1;
}
- stat->nr_pageout += nr_pages;
-
if (folio_test_writeback(folio))
goto keep;
if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
@@ -2043,10 +2041,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
item = PGSTEAL_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc);
mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, item, nr_reclaimed);
mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGSTEAL_ANON + file, nr_reclaimed);
+ if (nr_scanned > nr_reclaimed)
+ mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGROTATE_ANON + file,
+ nr_scanned - nr_reclaimed);
- lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
- lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(lruvec, file, stat.nr_pageout,
- nr_scanned - nr_reclaimed);
handle_reclaim_writeback(nr_taken, pgdat, sc, &stat);
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive(pgdat->node_id,
nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed, &stat, sc->priority, file);
@@ -2152,9 +2150,9 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
mod_node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + file, -nr_taken);
+ if (nr_rotated)
+ mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGROTATE_ANON + file, nr_rotated);
- lruvec_lock_irq(lruvec);
- lru_note_cost_unlock_irq(lruvec, file, 0, nr_rotated);
trace_mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active(pgdat->node_id, nr_taken, nr_activate,
nr_deactivate, nr_rotated, sc->priority, file);
}
@@ -2303,12 +2301,63 @@ static void prepare_scan_control(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
/*
- * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs.
+ * Determine the scan balance between anon and file LRUs from per-LRU
+ * vmstat counters. The raw cost per side is:
+ *
+ * PGROTATE - reclaim-driven rotations, bumped from both
+ * shrink_inactive_list and shrink_active_list
+ * (CPU work).
+ * NR_VMSCAN_WRITE - reclaim-driven anon pageout IO.
+ * WORKINGSET_RESTORE - refaults of previously-workingset pages.
+ *
+ * The two IO terms are weighted by SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX to reflect the
+ * higher cost of an IO over a rotation.
+ *
+ * Reads are lock-free per-cpu sum collations, rstat-aggregated up
+ * the memcg hierarchy by mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited() above.
+ * Use lruvec_page_state_monotonic() so the unsigned subtraction
+ * `now - prev_cost[f]` yields the correct delta across a signed-long
+ * wraparound of the underlying counter (a real hazard on 32-bit that
+ * the clamp in lruvec_page_state() would otherwise turn into a huge
+ * spurious delta).
+ *
+ * The delta against prev_cost is folded into cost_accum, which is
+ * halved on both sides until their sum is within lrusize/4.
+ * cost_lock serialises concurrent reclaimers in the same memcg+node.
*/
- spin_lock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
- sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->anon_cost;
- sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->file_cost;
- spin_unlock_irq(&target_lruvec->lru_lock);
+ spin_lock(&target_lruvec->cost_lock);
+ for (int f = 0; f <= 1; f++) {
+ unsigned long now, delta;
+
+ now = lruvec_page_state_monotonic(target_lruvec, PGROTATE_ANON + f) +
+ lruvec_page_state_monotonic(target_lruvec,
+ WORKINGSET_RESTORE_BASE + f) *
+ SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
+ if (f == WORKINGSET_ANON)
+ now += lruvec_page_state_monotonic(target_lruvec,
+ NR_VMSCAN_WRITE) *
+ SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
+ delta = now - target_lruvec->prev_cost[f];
+ target_lruvec->prev_cost[f] = now;
+ target_lruvec->cost_accum[f] += delta;
+ }
+ unsigned long lrusize =
+ lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_ANON) +
+ lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_ACTIVE_ANON) +
+ lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) +
+ lruvec_page_state(target_lruvec, NR_ACTIVE_FILE);
+ unsigned long cost_limit = lrusize / 4;
+
+ while (target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_ANON] > cost_limit ||
+ target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_FILE] > cost_limit ||
+ target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_ANON] +
+ target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_FILE] > cost_limit) {
+ target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_ANON] /= 2;
+ target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_FILE] /= 2;
+ }
+ sc->anon_cost = target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_ANON];
+ sc->file_cost = target_lruvec->cost_accum[WORKINGSET_FILE];
+ spin_unlock(&target_lruvec->cost_lock);
/*
* Target desirable inactive:active list ratios for the anon
@@ -4815,7 +4864,8 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct reclaim_stat stat;
struct lru_gen_mm_walk *walk;
int scanned, reclaimed;
- int isolated = 0, type, type_scanned;
+ int isolated = 0, nr_isolated = 0, type, type_scanned;
+ unsigned long total_reclaimed = 0;
bool skip_retry = false;
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
@@ -4827,6 +4877,7 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
scanned = isolate_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc, swappiness,
&list, &isolated, &type, &type_scanned);
+ nr_isolated = isolated;
/* Scanning may have emptied the oldest gen, flush it */
if (scanned)
@@ -4839,6 +4890,7 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
retry:
reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false, memcg);
sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed;
+ total_reclaimed += reclaimed;
/* Retry pass is only meant for clean folios without new isolation */
if (isolated)
handle_reclaim_writeback(isolated, pgdat, sc, &stat);
@@ -4892,6 +4944,10 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
goto retry;
}
+ if (nr_isolated > total_reclaimed)
+ mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGROTATE_ANON + type,
+ nr_isolated - total_reclaimed);
+
return scanned;
}
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index c4364f0eb08a..87d4a6781367 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -1300,6 +1300,8 @@ const char * const vmstat_text[] = {
[I(PGSCAN_PROACTIVE)] = "pgscan_proactive",
[I(PGSCAN_ANON)] = "pgscan_anon",
[I(PGSCAN_FILE)] = "pgscan_file",
+ [I(PGROTATE_ANON)] = "pgrotate_anon",
+ [I(PGROTATE_FILE)] = "pgrotate_file",
[I(PGREFILL)] = "pgrefill",
#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
[I(NR_HUGETLB)] = "nr_hugetlb",
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index f351798e723a..7ac2b88c80ae 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -584,11 +584,6 @@ void workingset_refault(struct folio *folio, void *shadow)
/* Folio was active prior to eviction */
if (workingset) {
folio_set_workingset(folio);
- /*
- * XXX: Move to folio_add_lru() when it supports new vs
- * putback
- */
- lru_note_cost_refault(folio);
mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, WORKINGSET_RESTORE_BASE + file, nr);
}
out:
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 13:57 [PATCH v3 0/2] mm/vmscan: reduce lru_lock contention via vmstat-derived scan-balance cost Usama Arif
2026-07-17 13:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/vmstat, mm/memcontrol: add _monotonic vmstat readers Usama Arif
2026-07-17 13:57 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-07-17 21:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/vmscan: reduce lru_lock contention via vmstat-derived scan-balance cost Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717135807.3476029-3-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=youngjun.park@lge.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.