From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1.1 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:51:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717145156.6D5CE1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717143445.91207-3-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Severe out-of-bounds slab write and infinite kernel loop in `damon_apply_min_nr_regions()` due to unchecked `damon_split_region_at()` failures.
--
--- Patch [2]: [RFC PATCH v1.1 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() ---
commit d2fdc98cf0d62ffe11b7dca50c29ff7c72e1fcd6
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at()
This commit fixes a potential invalid pointer dereference in the kunit tests
by checking if the region count changed as expected after a split attempt.
Since region splits can fail, it ensures the test exits early rather than
accessing an invalid next region.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260714142352.100478-1-sj@kernel.org
> diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> index eba643762132f..322a295ac2cec 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> +++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test)
> r->age = 10;
> damon_add_region(r, t);
> damon_split_region_at(t, r, 25);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 2);
> + if (damon_nr_regions(t) != 2)
> + goto out;
> +
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch correctly notes that
damon_split_region_at() can fail, does the same unhandled failure cause an
out-of-bounds access in the core code?
Looking at mm/damon/core.c:damon_apply_min_nr_regions():
while (damon_sz_region(r) > max_region_sz) {
damon_split_region_at(t, r, max_region_sz);
r = damon_next_region(r);
}
If damon_split_region_at() fails to allocate a sub-region under memory
pressure, it silently returns. The loop then unconditionally executes
r = damon_next_region(r). Since no new sub-region was created, it skips the
remainder of the original region and advances to the next one.
If this happens on the last region in the list, r evaluates to the list head
at &t->regions_list, pushing the region pointer out-of-bounds to
(char *)t - 24. The loop would then read garbage bytes for the region
boundaries.
If those garbage bytes evaluate to a size greater than max_region_sz, could
it call damon_split_region_at() again on this invalid pointer? If a
subsequent allocation succeeds, r->ar.end = new->ar.start could write a
user-monitored address into the out-of-bounds slab memory, potentially
corrupting memory 16 bytes before the damon_target object.
Additionally, if allocations consistently fail, could the fake region's next
pointer wrap back to the first valid region and create an unbreakable infinite
loop in the kdamond thread?
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 25ul);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717143445.91207-1-sj@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 14:34 [RFC PATCH v1.1 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 14:54 ` SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 3/7] mm/damon/vaddr-kunit: check region count in three_regions test SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 14:55 ` SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 4/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: handle region split failure in filter_out() SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 14:56 ` SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-17 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1.1 7/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong region walk in commit_target_regions() SJ Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717145156.6D5CE1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.