From: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@nvidia.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>, William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
alex@shazbot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track incoming preserved PCI devices
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:38:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717163820.6bc8c13b@shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710212616.1351130-4-dmatlack@google.com>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 21:26:06 +0000
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> wrote:
> @@ -298,6 +377,87 @@ void pci_liveupdate_unpreserve(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_liveupdate_unpreserve);
>
> +static struct pci_flb_incoming *pci_liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(void)
> +{
> + struct pci_flb_incoming *incoming = NULL;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(&pci_liveupdate_flb, (void **)&incoming);
> +
> + /* Live Update is not enabled. */
> + if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Live Update is enabled, but there is no incoming FLB data. */
> + if (ret == -ENODATA)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Live Update is enabled and there is incoming FLB data, but none of it
> + * matches pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible.
> + *
> + * This could mean that no PCI FLB data was passed by the previous
> + * kernel, but it could also mean the previous kernel used a different
> + * compatibility string (i.e. a different ABI).
> + */
> + if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> + pr_info_once("No incoming FLB matched %s\n", pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * There is incoming FLB data that matches pci_liveupdate_flb.compatible
> + * but it cannot be retrieved.
> + */
> + if (ret)
> + panic("Failed to retrieve incoming FLB data (%d)\n", ret);
> +
> + return incoming;
> +}
I'm having trouble following the error escalation here. What's
fundamentally the difference between FLB data being provided and not
compatible (subtle log message) versus FLB data being provided and
compatible but we cannot access it (panic!)?
Don't both suggest devices are running but we can't get their FLB data
to continue letting them run?
The errno interpretation is also slightly different than the comment
above liveupdate_flb_get_incoming():
* Return: 0 on success, or a negative errno on failure. -ENODATA means no
* incoming FLB data, -ENOENT means specific flb not found in the incoming
* data, -ENODEV if the FLB's module is unloading, and -EOPNOTSUPP when
* live update is disabled or not configured.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 21:26 [PATCH v7 00/12] PCI: liveupdate: PCI core support for Live Update David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] PCI: liveupdate: Set up FLB handler for the PCI core David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 19:28 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-17 19:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-17 19:40 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-17 19:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track outgoing preserved PCI devices David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 22:20 ` David Matlack
2026-07-17 19:38 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] PCI: liveupdate: Track incoming " David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 22:31 ` David Matlack
2026-07-17 21:46 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-17 22:38 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] PCI: liveupdate: Document driver binding responsibilities David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] PCI: liveupdate: Keep bus numbers constant during Live Update David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 21:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] PCI: liveupdate: Auto-preserve upstream bridges across " David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:00 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] PCI: Refactor matching logic for pci_dev_acs_ops David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:02 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] PCI: liveupdate: Inherit ACS flags in incoming preserved devices David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 22:08 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] PCI: liveupdate: Inherit ARI Forwarding Enable on preserved bridges David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 22:07 ` David Matlack
2026-07-17 23:29 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] PCI: liveupdate: Freeze preservation status during shutdown David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 23:30 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] PCI: liveupdate: Do not disable bus mastering on preserved devices during kexec David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 23:32 ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-07-10 21:26 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] Documentation: PCI: Add documentation for Live Update David Matlack
2026-07-10 21:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 23:38 ` Pasha Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260717163820.6bc8c13b@shazbot.org \
--to=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.