All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rob Clark" <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/16] drm/msm: Rework queuelock
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:00:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260717210039.8ADC81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717204841.26120-3-robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Deadlock in `msm_submitqueue_remove()` due to holding `ctxlock` during queue destruction.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v6 02/16] drm/msm: Rework queuelock ---
commit 308ab05b33546bb1bb25510a8f2b68c4b798cefc
Author: Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>

drm/msm: Rework queuelock

Rename to ctxlock, and use cleanup guards to manage releasing the lock.
This will let us re-use it for other per-context read/write serial-
ization, such as VM creation.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c
> index 1a5a77b280163..8b5980d5a6a79 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -335,19 +330,16 @@ int msm_submitqueue_remove(struct msm_context *ctx, u32 id)
>  	if (!id)
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  
> -	write_lock(&ctx->queuelock);
> +	guard(rwsem_write)(&ctx->ctxlock);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(entry, &ctx->submitqueues, node) {
>  		if (entry->id == id) {
>  			list_del(&entry->node);
> -			write_unlock(&ctx->queuelock);
> -
>  			msm_submitqueue_put(entry);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  	}

[Severity: High]
Does using guard() here extend the lock lifetime and create a deadlock?

In the original code, the lock was explicitly dropped before calling
msm_submitqueue_put(entry). By using guard(), the write lock is now held
during the msm_submitqueue_put() call since the scope of the guard is the
entire function.

If a user destroys a queue while jobs are pending, msm_submitqueue_put() can
drop the last reference. This calls drm_sched_entity_destroy(), which blocks
waiting for those pending jobs to complete.

If another job needs to be submitted to signal a fence that the pending job is
waiting on, the submission path will call msm_submitqueue_get() and block
trying to acquire ctxlock for reading. This creates a circular deadlock where
queue destruction waits for the job to complete, but the job waits for a
submission that is blocked waiting for ctxlock.

> -	write_unlock(&ctx->queuelock);
>  	return -ENOENT;
>  }
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260717204841.26120-1-robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-17 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-17 20:48 [PATCH v6 00/16] drm/msm: A couple lazy-vm fixes Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] drm/msm: Fix barriers accessing ctx vm Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] drm/msm: Rework queuelock Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:00   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] drm/msm: Synchronize VM creation on ctxlock Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] drm/msm: Synchronize set_sysprof " Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] drm/msm: Move nr_cmds initialization Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] drm/msm: Remove redundant SIZE_MAX check Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] drm/msm/a6xx: Access VM directly in submit path Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] drm/msm: Add helper to check for per-process pgtables VM Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] drm/msm/gem: Remove useless locking in GEM import Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] drm/msm/gem: Extract bookkeeping init helper Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] drm/msm/gem: Set resv before exposing obj Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] drm/msm/gem: Validate lazy VM in GEM_NEW Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] drm/msm: Allow lazy VM creation to fail Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] drm/msm: Don't fallback to shared VM for VM_BIND Rob Clark
2026-07-17 21:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] drm/msm: Fix per-process-pgtables check Rob Clark
2026-07-17 20:48 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] drm/msm: Fixup invalid overflow check Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260717210039.8ADC81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.