All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:32:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718003220.DEDC31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718001442.87129-2-sj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Uninitialized memory use in DAMOS quota goals allocation (last_psi_total and nid).
- [High] damos_quota_init() modifies the passed quota struct, unintentionally resetting runtime quota statistics of actively running schemes.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied ---
commit 316d27ac2ea17607b5c9df656020658fa1b425df
Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied

This commit initializes the last_applied field of the damos scheme struct to
NULL in damon_new_scheme(). This prevents an uninitialized value from causing
a DAMON scheme to unexpectedly skip applying an action to a folio the very
first time.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260714055436.120034-1-sj@kernel.org

> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 603b102ff80f9..20d267c615faf 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ struct damos *damon_new_scheme(struct damos_access_pattern *pattern,
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme->ops_filters);
>  	scheme->stat = (struct damos_stat){};
>  	scheme->max_nr_snapshots = 0;
> +	scheme->last_applied = NULL;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&scheme->list);
>  
>  	scheme->quota = *(damos_quota_init(quota));

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does damos_quota_init() unintentionally reset 
the runtime statistics of actively running schemes?

When updating a DAMON context via sysfs, damon_commit_ctx() calls 
damon_new_test_ctx() which iterates over running schemes and calls 
damon_new_scheme(), passing the active &src_scheme->quota pointer.

Inside damon_new_scheme(), it executes:
scheme->quota = *(damos_quota_init(quota));

If damos_quota_init() directly modifies the passed pointer:

mm/damon/core.c:damos_quota_init() {
    quota->esz = 0;
    quota->total_charged_sz = 0;
    quota->total_charged_ns = 0;
    quota->charged_sz = 0;
    ...
}

It appears this silently clears the tracking variables of the actively running 
scheme, potentially breaking the ability to track memory usage limits.

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing initialization,
I noticed a potential issue with quota goals. Are the metric-specific fields in
damos_new_quota_goal() left uninitialized?

When allocating a new goal via sysfs or damon_commit_ctx():

mm/damon/core.c:damos_new_quota_goal() {
    ...
    goal = kmalloc_obj(*goal);
    ...
}

It seems fields like last_psi_total and nid are not zero-initialized.

Later, damos_commit_quota_goal_union() misses the switch case for 
DAMOS_QUOTA_NODE_ELIGIBLE_MEM_BP, leaving dst->nid uninitialized.

This can result in using garbage values when calculating current_value:

mm/damon/core.c:damos_set_quota_goal_current_value() {
    ...
    goal->current_value = damos_get_node_eligible_mem_bp(c, s, goal->nid);
    ...
}

And for PSI goals:

mm/damon/core.c:damos_set_quota_goal_current_value() {
    ...
    goal->current_value = now_psi_total - goal->last_psi_total;
    goal->last_psi_total = now_psi_total;
    ...
}

Could subtracting an uninitialized last_psi_total underflow and cause the 
quota tuner to aggressively zero out the quota?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718001442.87129-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-18  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18  0:14 [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-18  0:53     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: check region count before testing in split_at() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  0:55     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/damon/vaddr-kunit: check region count in three_regions test SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: handle region split failure in filter_out() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:00     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong dest walk in commit_dests_for() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:01     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong quota goal walk in commit_quota_goals() SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18  1:02     ` SJ Park
2026-07-18  0:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/damon/core-kunit: skip wrong region walk in commit_target_regions() SJ Park
2026-07-18  1:13 ` [PATCH 0/7] mm/damon: fix uninitialized DAMOS field and kunit exec expectation bugs SJ Park
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-17  0:30 SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:30 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/damon/core: initialize damos->last_applied SJ Park
2026-07-17  0:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-17  1:12     ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260718003220.DEDC31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.