From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] bpf: Consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 12:39:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718163925.3343620-1-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026071450-emerald-washer-7a87@gregkh>
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 48a97ffc6c826640907d13b199e29008f4fe2c15 ]
We have many places which open-code what's now is bpf_rcu_lock_held()
macro, so replace all those places with a clean and short macro invocation.
For that, move bpf_rcu_lock_held() macro into include/linux/bpf.h.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251014201403.4104511-1-andrii@kernel.org
Stable-dep-of: 2f884d371faf ("bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 3 ---
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 21 +++++++--------------
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 12 ++++--------
kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 6 ++----
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 3045de8e3f6602..436d862682916b 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1722,6 +1722,9 @@ bpf_prog_run_array_sleepable(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu,
return ret;
}
+#define bpf_rcu_lock_held() \
+ (rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() || rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
+
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active);
extern struct mutex bpf_stats_enabled_mutex;
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index 6d37a40cd90e8d..bcc6919f2ce414 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@
#define BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_CACHE_SIZE 16
-#define bpf_rcu_lock_held() \
- (rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() || \
- rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket {
struct hlist_head list;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 06bc7f26be06f1..b2f207a5dd4fd9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -670,8 +670,7 @@ static void *__htab_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
struct htab_elem *l;
u32 hash, key_size;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1088,8 +1087,7 @@ static int htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1190,8 +1188,7 @@ static int htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1259,8 +1256,7 @@ static int __htab_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1314,8 +1310,7 @@ static int __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1390,8 +1385,7 @@ static int htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
u32 hash, key_size;
int ret;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1426,8 +1420,7 @@ static int htab_lru_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
u32 hash, key_size;
int ret;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index a19524c672012e..cf422c80b30b30 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -33,8 +33,7 @@
*/
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_lookup_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
}
@@ -50,8 +49,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = {
BPF_CALL_4(bpf_map_update_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key,
void *, value, u64, flags)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
}
@@ -68,8 +66,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = {
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_delete_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
}
@@ -125,8 +122,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_peek_elem_proto = {
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key, u32, cpu)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_percpu_elem(map, key, cpu);
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index fd6e31e7229080..c88b3d24537ee0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -353,8 +353,7 @@ static int trie_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
*/
slot = &trie->root;
- while ((node = rcu_dereference_protected(*slot,
- lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock)))) {
+ while ((node = rcu_dereference_protected(*slot, 1))) {
matchlen = longest_prefix_match(trie, node, key);
if (node->prefixlen != matchlen ||
@@ -475,8 +474,7 @@ static int trie_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key)
trim = &trie->root;
trim2 = trim;
parent = NULL;
- while ((node = rcu_dereference_protected(
- *trim, lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock)))) {
+ while ((node = rcu_dereference_protected(*trim, 1))) {
matchlen = longest_prefix_match(trie, node, key);
if (node->prefixlen != matchlen ||
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-18 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 15:53 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2026-07-18 16:39 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-07-18 16:39 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260718163925.3343620-1-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.