From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mykola Marzhan" <mykola@meshstor.io>
Cc: yukuai@fygo.io, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_TARGET for unsupported P2P transfers
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:17:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260719111721.294151F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719105327.864949-8-mykola@meshstor.io>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting use-after-free and DMA unmap corruption in the `nvme_rdma_queue_rq` error path.
- [High] Preexisting resource leak of multipath `nr_active` and QoS metrics when `nvme_rdma_post_send()` fails.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v2 7/7] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_TARGET for unsupported P2P transfers ---
commit 8ebcd8a34c348b015bd58fe860d4af84c9a7b8c5
Author: Mykola Marzhan <mykola@meshstor.io>
nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_TARGET for unsupported P2P transfers
This commit updates nvme-rdma to correctly handle P2PDMA mapping failures
by preserving the DMA layer's error code. It translates -EREMOTEIO to
BLK_STS_TARGET to avoid endless requeue livelocks for unreachable peer
memory, and it defers nvme_start_request() until after mapping succeeds.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> index 6909e35427942..9017d927edc41 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2026,8 +2029,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> if (ret)
> goto unmap_qe;
>
> - nvme_start_request(rq);
> -
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY) &&
> queue->pi_support &&
> (c->common.opcode == nvme_cmd_write ||
> @@ -2039,11 +2040,13 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>
> err = nvme_rdma_map_data(queue, rq, c);
> if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
> - dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
> - "Failed to map data (%d)\n", err);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
> + "Failed to map data (%d)\n", err);
> goto err;
> }
>
> + nvme_start_request(rq);
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if nvme_rdma_post_send() fails further
down, does returning a block status error after nvme_start_request() has
been called bypass the NVMe completion handlers?
Since the block layer will natively complete the request in this scenario,
it looks like nvme_mpath_end_request() is bypassed, which could permanently
leak the nr_active counter and break multipath load balancing.
> sqe->cqe.done = nvme_rdma_send_done;
>
> ib_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, sqe->dma,
> @@ -2063,6 +2066,13 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> ret = nvme_host_path_error(rq);
> else if (err == -ENOMEM || err == -EAGAIN)
> ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + /*
> + * The DMA layer refused to map peer memory to this device: a
> + * property of the pairing, not a path failure. Match nvme-pci
> + * and do not retry (see blk_path_error()).
> + */
> + else if (err == -EREMOTEIO)
> + ret = BLK_STS_TARGET;
> else
> ret = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> nvme_cleanup_cmd(rq);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can this error path lead to a
use-after-free and DMA unmap corruption?
If nvme_rdma_post_send() fails with -EIO, nvme_host_path_error(rq) is
called, which synchronously completes and frees the request. The code then
falls through to execute nvme_cleanup_cmd(rq) and ib_dma_unmap_single() on
the already freed request.
Could this unmap the active DMA region of a completely different, newly
allocated I/O command?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260719105327.864949-1-mykola@meshstor.io?part=7
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-19 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 10:53 [PATCH v2 0/7] block,md,nvme: correct handling of unsupported P2PDMA transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] blk-mq-dma: restore BLK_STS_TARGET for unsupported P2P transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 11:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CAPzsNDv6hUV3gHdaxuwjRcr4couUKq_M5DKObFNaYqCHnm7ZMw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-07-20 18:42 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-20 18:49 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-21 17:49 ` Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] md: ensure REQ_NOMERGE is set on P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 11:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-19 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] md/raid1: serialize non-write-behind writes on CollisionCheck rdevs Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 11:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-19 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] md/raid1: don't use write-behind for P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 11:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 16:31 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-19 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 11:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 16:32 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-19 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] md/raid1,raid10: skip futile retries on P2PDMA mapping failures Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 11:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 16:49 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-21 17:50 ` Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-21 23:38 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-19 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_TARGET for unsupported P2P transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-19 11:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260719111721.294151F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mykola@meshstor.io \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.