From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, dvhart@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
andrealmeid@igalia.com, liuyongqiang13@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] futex/requeue: Fix rtmutex schedule preparation for requeue PI
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:58:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720145847.QW7LB9jE@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89dce8bf-8aec-4b3a-a588-f3dab35e8977@huawei.com>
On 2026-07-20 10:40:03 [+0800], Yao Kai wrote:
> I have a test but it only triggers the warning. The concern about calling
> rt_mutex_pre_schedule() after the proxy waiter has been enqueued came from
> audit. A generic PREEMPT_RT path could be:
>
> rt_mutex_pre_schedule()
> sched_submit_work()
> blk_flush_plug()
> __blk_flush_plug()
> flush_plug_callbacks()
> drbd_unplug()
> spin_lock_irq()
> rtlock_slowlock()
> task_blocks_on_rt_mutex()
> current->pi_blocked_on = waiter
>
> However, I could not find a path for FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI to enter with a
> live current->plug or worker flags, so this recursion is not reachable from
> this syscall.
So the suggestion is okay then?
…
> > what about the following? This might compile but lacks all kind of testing.
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/futex/requeue.c b/kernel/futex/requeue.c
> > index 79823ad136830..42a04e6e774c4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/futex/requeue.c
> > +++ b/kernel/futex/requeue.c
> > @@ -865,7 +865,9 @@ int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
> > case Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE:
> > /* Requeue completed. Current is 'pi_blocked_on' the rtmutex */
> > pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
> > + rt_mutex_pre_schedule();
> > ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
> > + rt_mutex_post_schedule();
> > /*
> > * See futex_unlock_pi()'s cleanup: comment.
>
> This also fixes the warning in my test. I would keep rt_mutex_post_schedule()
> after the proxy waiter cleanup, as futex_lock_pi() does:
But why?
> diff --git a/kernel/futex/requeue.c b/kernel/futex/requeue.c
> index 79823ad13683..41ffc795d12c 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex/requeue.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex/requeue.c
> @@ -865,6 +865,7 @@ int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
> case Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE:
> /* Requeue completed. Current is 'pi_blocked_on' the rtmutex */
> pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
> + rt_mutex_pre_schedule();
> ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
> /*
> @@ -875,6 +876,7 @@ int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
> futex_q_lockptr_lock(&q);
> debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
> + rt_mutex_post_schedule();
But there is futex_q_lockptr_lock() from what I see in the context. This
one should trigger the warning if it is done as you suggest.
> /*
> * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we
> * haven't already.
>
> Thanks,
> Yao
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 8:49 [PATCH 0/2] futex/requeue: Fix requeue PI races Yao Kai
2026-07-17 8:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] futex/requeue: Fix rtmutex schedule preparation for requeue PI Yao Kai
2026-07-17 8:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-20 2:40 ` Yao Kai
2026-07-20 14:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-07-21 1:51 ` Yao Kai
2026-07-21 7:23 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-21 9:02 ` Yao Kai
2026-07-21 9:45 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-17 8:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] futex/requeue: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during " Yao Kai
2026-07-17 9:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-20 2:50 ` Yao Kai
2026-07-20 14:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-21 2:19 ` Yao Kai
2026-07-21 7:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720145847.QW7LB9jE@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyongqiang13@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=yaokai34@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.