Re: [PATCH v1 1/1 RESEND] media: i2c: mt9m114: Add get_fwnode_pad operation for IFP

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:36:50AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> ср, 15 лип. 2026 р. о 19:31 Laurent Pinchart пише:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 07:18:18PM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > вт, 14 лип. 2026 р. о 22:16 Laurent Pinchart пише:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 11:21:11AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > > > Currently, the driver's binding exposes only one endpoint, which maps to
> > > > > the IFP subdevice's SOURCE pad. This configuration causes failures for
> > > > > many devices using this camera because both the DT binding and the
> > > > > one-to-one pad mapping logic map the endpoint to the wrong pad.
> > > >
> > > > Could you please explain what failures this causes ? A brief analysis  of
> > > > the code seems to indicate the patch will only make a difference when
> > > > the DT node has multiple endpoints, and will prevent links to be created
> > > > for any endpoint but the first one. I don't think that's desirable.
> > >
> > > OF schema documents only a single port with a single endpoint. Since
> > > driver has no alternative OF matching logic endpoints patch to media
> > > pads one-to-one. IFP has 2 pads, id 0 is sink and id 1 is source. So
> > > according to one-to-one match endpoint from the binding co-responds to
> > > the sink media pad of IFP, source pad which is usually used to build
> > > the video pipe is not represented in the bindings entirely.
> >
> > But the mt9m114 driver doesn't use 1-to-1 matching, it does not use the
> > v4l2_subdev_get_fwnode_pad_1_to_1() function to implement
> > .get_fwnode_pad().
> 
> Correct, hence media framework does not know how to link pads and
> starts to do weird stuff.

When .get_fwnode_pad() is not set, media_entity_get_fwnode_pad() will
return the first pad of the entity that matches the requested direction.
That should work fine as far as I can see.

> > > This causes drivers which relay on OF bindings to build their video pipes
> > > fail to work with this driver.
> >
> > Could you provide an example of such a failure ?
> 
> Tegra VI driver hooks mt9m114 IFP sink pad to sci source and mt9m114
> IFP sink pad to csi source. With this patch OF endpoint is strictly
> associated with IFP source pad, and nothing else which is desirable
> setup IMHO.

Could you please investigate to see why this happens ? I suspect there's
a bug somewhere else, possibly in the VI driver.

> > > Sakari suggested this to fix OF
> > > matching, so I have implemented it.
> > >
> > > > > Fix this
> > > > > by implementing the get_fwnode_pad operation for the IFP, which correctly
> > > > > matches the endpoint to the corresponding IFP pad.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c
> > > > > index e395e2d14e97..16c2582551d3 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c
> > > > > @@ -1020,14 +1020,6 @@ static int mt9m114_stop_streaming(struct mt9m114 *sensor)
> > > > >       return ret;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > -/* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > - * Common Subdev Operations
> > > > > - */
> > > > > -
> > > > > -static const struct media_entity_operations mt9m114_entity_ops = {
> > > > > -     .link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate,
> > > > > -};
> > > > > -
> > > > >  /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >   * Pixel Array Control Operations
> > > > >   */
> > > > > @@ -1381,6 +1373,10 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_internal_ops mt9m114_pa_internal_ops = {
> > > > >       .init_state = mt9m114_pa_init_state,
> > > > >  };
> > > > >
> > > > > +static const struct media_entity_operations mt9m114_pa_entity_ops = {
> > > > > +     .link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate,
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static int mt9m114_pa_init(struct mt9m114 *sensor)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >       struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl = &sensor->pa.hdl;
> > > > > @@ -1403,7 +1399,7 @@ static int mt9m114_pa_init(struct mt9m114 *sensor)
> > > > >
> > > > >       /* Initialize the media entity. */
> > > > >       sd->entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR;
> > > > > -     sd->entity.ops = &mt9m114_entity_ops;
> > > > > +     sd->entity.ops = &mt9m114_pa_entity_ops;
> > > > >       pads[0].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> > > > >       ret = media_entity_pads_init(&sd->entity, 1, pads);
> > > > >       if (ret < 0)
> > > > > @@ -2092,6 +2088,29 @@ static int mt9m114_ifp_registered(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > > > >       return 0;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * The IFP has only one fwnode endpoint, which corresponds to the pad
> > > > > + * linked to the PA (PA SINK), while it should be the SOURCE for the
> > > > > + * next media device in the pipe.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +static int mt9m114_ifp_get_fwnode_pad(struct media_entity *entity,
> > > > > +                                   struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +     struct v4l2_subdev *sd = media_entity_to_v4l2_subdev(entity);
> > > > > +     struct mt9m114 *sensor = ifp_to_mt9m114(sd);
> > > > > +     struct fwnode_handle *ifp_port = dev_fwnode(&sensor->client->dev);
> > > >
> > > > This is not a port fwnode. I'd name the variable just fwnode.
> > > >
> > >
> > > fair
> > >
> > > > > +     struct fwnode_handle *ifp_ep;
> > > > > +     int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     ifp_ep = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(ifp_port, NULL);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     ret = endpoint->local_fwnode == ifp_ep ? 1 : -ENXIO;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     fwnode_handle_put(ifp_ep);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     return ret;
> > > >
> > > > Let's use the cleanup API:
> > > >
> > > > #include <cleanup.h>
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > >         struct v4l2_subdev *sd = media_entity_to_v4l2_subdev(entity);
> > > >         struct mt9m114 *sensor = ifp_to_mt9m114(sd);
> > > >         struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&sensor->client->dev);
> > > >         struct fwnode_handle *ifp_ep __free(fwnode_handle) =
> > > >                 fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, NULL);
> > > >
> > > >         return endpoint->local_fwnode == ifp_ep ? 1 : -ENXIO;
> > > >
> > >
> > > The code is functionally same. I am fine with any version subsystem
> > > maintainer will prefer.
> > >
> 
> Sakari, should I apply Laurent's changes and resend?
> 
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static const struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops mt9m114_ifp_video_ops = {
> > > > >       .s_stream = mt9m114_ifp_s_stream,
> > > > >  };
> > > > > @@ -2119,6 +2138,11 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_internal_ops mt9m114_ifp_internal_ops = {
> > > > >       .unregistered = mt9m114_ifp_unregistered,
> > > > >  };
> > > > >
> > > > > +static const struct media_entity_operations mt9m114_ifp_entity_ops = {
> > > > > +     .link_validate = v4l2_subdev_link_validate,
> > > > > +     .get_fwnode_pad = mt9m114_ifp_get_fwnode_pad,
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static int mt9m114_ifp_init(struct mt9m114 *sensor)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >       struct v4l2_subdev *sd = &sensor->ifp.sd;
> > > > > @@ -2136,7 +2160,7 @@ static int mt9m114_ifp_init(struct mt9m114 *sensor)
> > > > >
> > > > >       /* Initialize the media entity. */
> > > > >       sd->entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_ISP;
> > > > > -     sd->entity.ops = &mt9m114_entity_ops;
> > > > > +     sd->entity.ops = &mt9m114_ifp_entity_ops;
> > > > >       pads[0].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
> > > > >       pads[1].flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> > > > >       ret = media_entity_pads_init(&sd->entity, 2, pads);

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart