Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: leds: leds-cpcap: convert to DT schema

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The commit message description following the subsystem prefix is not capitalized.
- [Low] The newly added YAML binding points to a non-existent MFD schema, and the parent MFD binding still points to the deleted text file.
- [Low] The YAML binding conversion omitted the `examples` block.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: leds: leds-cpcap: convert to DT schema ---
commit 42a8d75469150373ffb675f9ae6fccd8e3d482d6
Author: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>

dt-bindings: leds: leds-cpcap: convert to DT schema

Convert LEDs devicetree bindings for the Motorola CPCAP MFD from TXT to
YAML format. This patch does not change any functionality; the bindings
remain the same.

> dt-bindings: leds: leds-cpcap: convert to DT schema

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but should the description following the subsystem prefix
be capitalized? The LED subsystem conventions typically expect a capitalized
description, such as "Convert to DT schema".

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/motorola,cpcap-leds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/motorola,cpcap-leds.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..c8e7b88a05ccf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/motorola,cpcap-leds.yaml

[ ... ]

> +description:
> +  This module is part of the Motorola CPCAP MFD device. For more details
> +  see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml. LEDs are
> +  represented as sub-nodes of the PMIC node on the device tree.

[Severity: Low]
Does motorola,cpcap.yaml exist yet? It looks like this references a
non-existent MFD schema. Additionally, the parent MFD binding in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola-cpcap.txt wasn't updated
to reflect the deletion of the old leds-cpcap.txt file.

[ ... ]

> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - label
> +  - vdd-supply
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +...

[Severity: Low]
Should this YAML file include an examples block? The YAML conversion
drops the original usage example from the .txt file. 

Running dt_binding_check on standalone schemas that lack an examples section
can result in warnings or incomplete schema validation.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721095654.429346-1-clamor95@gmail.com?part=1